Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Comparison of ECV measurements during equilibrium between IR- and SR-based Cardiac T1Mapping

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 2,
  • 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201416 (Suppl 1) :P53

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-16-S1-P53

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Heart Beat
  • Cardiac Fibrosis
  • Extracellular Volume Fraction
  • Rapid Heart Rate
  • Magnetization Preparation

Background

Cardiac T1 and extracellular volume fraction (ECV), derived from pre- and post-contrast cardiac and blood T1 measurements, are emerging imaging biomarkers of diffuse cardiac fibrosis. The most frequently used cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence is MOLLI [1]. However, MOLLI is known to be sensitive to rapid heart rate and irregular rhythm, because it is based on inversion-recovery (IR) of magnetization preparation. In response, we developed an arrhythmia-insensitive-rapid (AIR) cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequence based on B1-insensitive saturation-recovery (SR) of magnetization preparation [2]. Our prior study [2] showed that AIR (scan time = 2-3 heart beats) is faster and yields more accurate cardiac T1 measurements than MOLLI (scan time = 17 heart beats). We sought to compare ECV measurements between SR-based AIR and IR-based MOLLI cardiac T1 mapping at 3T.

Methods

Sixteen mongrel dogs with normal myocardium were imaged at 3T (Verio, Siemens). Cardiac T1 maps were acquired in a mid-ventricular short-axis plane using both AIR and MOLLI cardiac T1 mapping at baseline and during equilibrium of Gd-BOPTA (Multihance; 30 min after slow infusion at 0.002 mmol/kg/min). Note that equilibrium ensures identical concentration of Gd-BOPTA for a fair comparison of cardiac and blood T1 measured by two different pulse sequences. Both AIR and MOLLI acquisitions with b-SSFP readout were performed with the following relevant imaging parameters: spatial resolution = 1.4 × 1.4 × 7.0 mm, temporal resolution = 217 ms, flip angle = 35°, and SR time = 600 ms. The AIR acquisition was performed with "paired" consecutive phase-encoding steps in centric k-space ordering to minimize image artifacts due to eddy currents. Blood samples were drawn during MRI for hematocrit calculation. AIR and MOLLI cardiac T1 maps were manually segmented to calculate the myocardial and blood T1 values and subsequently ECV=(1-hematocrit)x(ΔR1, myocardium/ΔR1, blood), where R1 is T1-1, and Δ is the difference between post- and pre-contrast. Paired-wise t-test and Bland-Altman analyses were performed to compare the results.

Results

Figure 1 shows representative AIR and MOLLI cardiac T1 maps which exhibit similarly high image quality. In the 16 dogs studied (mean heart rate = 100 ± 19 BPM), compared with MOLLI, AIR yielded higher T1 measurements (mean difference = 185 ms; p < 0.0001) and lower ECV measurements (mean difference = -0.018; p < 0.0001).
Figure 1
Figure 1

Example SR-based AIR and IR-based MOLLI cardiac T 1 maps of the same animal acquired during equilibrium.

Conclusions

Our study suggests that MOLLI and AIR cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequences yield significantly different T1 and ECV measurements. ECV measurements derived from SR-based AIR and IR-based MOLLI cardiac T1 mapping pulse sequences may need to be adjusted for comparison

Funding

Ben B. and Iris M. Margolis Foundation.
Figure 2
Figure 2

Bland-Altman plots comparing (left) cardiac T 1 and (right) ECV measurements derived from SR-based AIR and IR-based MOLLI cardiac T 1 mapping.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
UCAIR, Radiology, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA
(2)
Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA

References

  1. Messroghli DR, et al: MRM. 2004, 141-146.Google Scholar
  2. Fitts M, et al: MRM. 2012, DOI:10.1002/mrm.24586Google Scholar

Copyright

© Hong et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2014

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Advertisement