- Oral presentation
- Open Access
Automatic scar segmentation in dual inversion recovery images is more consistent with manual outlining than in conventional inversion recovery images
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 17, Article number: O48 (2015)
The dual inversion recovery (dual IR) pulse sequence has recently been shown to improve blood suppression and infarct delineation in late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) images of myocardial infarction. This resulted in significantly lower inter-observer variability in manual outlining of scar and higher expert confidence in scar detection and transmurality when compared with conventional inversion recovery (IR) images.
Computer algorithms have been shown to improve the accuracy of scar segmentation within IR images. We sought to develop and optimise a set of computer algorithms to quantify scar in both IR and dual IR images.
A series of automated segmentation algorithms was developed for the separation of scar and healthy myocardium in IR and dual IR images. These rely on a combination of pre-processing, standard deviation thresholding and feature analysis (see Figure 1). Each stage has been optimised to match the manual segmentation of IR and dual IR images of 10 patients with chronic, left ventricular scar. Although the steps are not new in themselves, there are several novel aspects to the algorithms that have been developed. Importantly, the myocardial distribution of pixel intensities is computationally defined using a reflection method and does not rely on manual or region of interest input; this removes a source of subjectivity from pre-existing segmentation algorithms. Subendocardial distance feature analysis is implemented using a novel criterion that should perform equally well for ventricles of different sizes.
The Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) was used to assess agreement between algorithmic and manual segmentations, indicating optimal performance.
The mean DSC achieved by the Sequence Optimised Segmentation (SOS) algorithms exceeds 0.70, suggesting that the automated analysis of dual IR images is firstly possible and that excellent agreement between manual and automated segmentations is observed. For the dual IR sequence with T 1 , min = 200 ms the mean DSC is 0.80, higher than the value of 0.66 for the IR images (see Figure 2). The optimisation procedure suggests that in line with previous work, the pixel intensity threshold between normal myocardium and scar is between 2 and 3 standard deviations above the mean of the normal myocardium. Preliminary results for a subset of dual IR images also indicated that automated segmentation was possible without manual definition of the endocardial border and was sensitive to scar in the papillary muscles.
The SOS algorithms quantify scar in both IR and dual IR images of the left ventricle. They show excellent agreement with manual segmentation performed by an expert cardiologist. Mean DSC for dual IR segmentation (0.80) exceeds that for IR images (0.66). This likely reflects the superior blood suppression of the dual IR sequence, allowing the expert to adopt a consistent approach to manual segmentation. Future work will focus on using the same methods to match algorithm performance to histology.
The original study on which this work is based was funded by the British Heart Foundation Research Excellence Centre and the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre.
Please note that references have not been included due to concerns over institutional disclosure, but are available upon request.
About this article
Cite this article
Byrne, N., Botnar, R., Hussain, T. et al. Automatic scar segmentation in dual inversion recovery images is more consistent with manual outlining than in conventional inversion recovery images. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17 (Suppl 1), O48 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-O48
- Late Gadolinium Enhancement
- Inversion Recovery
- Automate Segmentation
- Manual Segmentation
- Normal Myocardium