- Walking poster presentation
- Open access
- Published:
Myocardial extracellular volume estimation by CMR predicts functional recovery following acute myocardial infarction
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 17, Article number: Q63 (2015)
Background
The transmural extent of myocardial infarction (MI) as assessed by late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) CMR predicts functional recovery. In acute MI (AMI), myocardial edema and effects of reperfusion therapy reduce the predictive accuracy of LGE. LGE assesses tissue dichotomously as "viable" or "non-viable", but does not consider the severity of tissue damage within the hyperenhanced infarct zone. Extracellular volume (ECV) estimation, using native and post-contrast T1 mapping CMR, allows for quantitative assessment of severity of myocardial damage. We aimed to assess if CMR-derived measurement of infarct ECV offers additional predictive value over LGE extent for contractile recovery in reperfused AMI.
Methods
35 patients presenting with first ST-segment elevation AMI treated by primary percutaneous coronary intervention underwent acute (day 2) and convalescent (3 months) CMR at 3.0 Tesla. Cine imaging, tissue tagging, modified Look-Locker inversion T1 mapping (3-3-5 acquisition with 3x R-R interval recovery epochs) natively and 15 minutes post gadolinium-contrast administration and LGE imaging at 20 minutes were performed. The ability of acute infarct ECV and acute transmural extent of LGE to predict convalescent wall motion, ejection fraction (EF) and strain were compared. A per-patient analysis was performed using a region of interest corresponding to the core of the infarct, excluding any microvascular obstruction (MO). Segmental analysis was also performed and evaluated using a multilevel linear mixed-effects model to account for non-independence of segmental data.
Results
Per-patient, ECV and transmural extent of LGE correlated with convalescent wall motion score (r=0.43, p<0.01; r=0.41, p=0.02 respectively) and convalescent EF (r=-0.56, p<0.01; r=-0.36, p=0.04). Per-segment, acute ECV and LGE transmural extent were associated with convalescent wall motion score (β=0.55, r=0.54, p<0.01; β=0.50, r=0.50, p<0.01, Figure 1). ECV had higher accuracy than LGE extent to predict improvement in wall motion (area under receiver-operator-characteristics curve 0.77 vs. 0.68, p=0.02, Figure 2). ECV of ≤0.5 had sensitivity 81% and specificity 65% for prediction of improvement in segmental function. Adding ECV analysis to a 50% LGE transmural extent cut-off for prediction of improved wall motion in dysfunctional segments increased sensitivity from 87% to 89% and specificity from 34% to 81%. In multivariable analysis, acute infarct ECV was independently associated with both convalescent infarct strain and EF (β=0.58, p<0.001; β=-0.39, p=0.02) whereas LGE was not (β=0.13, p=0.35; β=-0.20, p=0.2). Acute infarct ECV in patients with and without MO was similar (0.54±0.18 vs. 0.57±0.10, p=0.6).
Conclusions
Acute infarct ECV in reperfused AMI predicts regional and global LV remodeling, independent of transmural extent of infarction. Acute infarct ECV predicts functional recovery better than transmural infarct extent by LGE, demonstrating potential clinical utility for ECV mapping post-AMI.
Funding
S.P is funded by British Heart Foundation fellowship (FS/10/62/28409).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Kidambi, A., Motwani, M., Uddin, A. et al. Myocardial extracellular volume estimation by CMR predicts functional recovery following acute myocardial infarction. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 17 (Suppl 1), Q63 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-Q63
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-17-S1-Q63