- Oral presentation
- Open Access
- Published:
Phase-Sensitive ChEmical Selection (PiSCES) method for fat signal removal in LGE
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 18, Article number: O54 (2016)
Background
Late Gadolinium Enhancement (LGE) allows imaging of infarction by visualizing the accumulation of contrast agent within the myocardium using an inversion recovery (IR) prepared sequence. However, myocardial hyperenhancement can sometimes be poorly detected in the vicinity of epicardial fat because both fat and hyperenhanced tissue appear bright. Thus, a method for fat signal suppression is desired. One previous approach to fat-suppressed LGE was to null fat signal with appropriately timed tip-up/tip-down fat-selective RF pulses [1], but this technique can leave residual fat signal in the image due both to sensitivity to off-resonance and timing requirements to achieve fat nulling. The goal of the present work is to achieve more complete and robust fat suppression by introducing a Phase-Sensitive ChEmical Selection (PiSCES) method that combines phase-sensitive (PS) image reconstruction [2] with customized timing of fat-selective RF pulses.
Methods
PiSCES is a modification of PS LGE. First, an IR pulse is played with an inversion time (TI) chosen to null normal myocardial tissue. Next, fat-selective tip-up and tip-down pulses are applied, with the tip-down pulse played immediately prior to data acquisition such that fat experiences minimal T1 relaxation and longitudinal magnetization of fat signal lies below the transverse plane (Mz < 0) during acquisition (Fig. 1).
After PS reconstruction fat appears black due to its opposite signal polarity (Mz < 0) vs. hyperenhanced tissue (Mz > 0). To achieve this the following condition for TIfat, the time between the fat tip-down pulse and the center of k-space acquisition, must be met: TIfat < -T1,fat*log(0.5 + exp(-(TI-Tt)/T1,fat) - exp(-TI/T1,fat) + 0.5*exp(-2*RR/T1,fat)), where Tt: time between IR and fat tip-up pulses, RR: R-R interval duration.
PiSCES was applied in 8 patients using Discovery MR750w 3.0T (GE Healthcare) and compared to conventional fat-suppressed magnitude LGE with heart rate adaptive timing [3].
Results
In 7 out of 8 exams conventional fat nulling resulted in significantly reduced but not completely removed fat signal (Fig. 2(c)), whereas with PiSCES fat signal was completely removed (Fig. 2(b)), as judged by an experienced cardiac radiologist. There was 1 scan with incomplete fat suppression, presumably due to poor shim. In one case pericardial hyperenhancement was better visualized with PiSCES (Fig. 2(e)), confirmed by the negative PiSCES image showing a thin line of pericardial fat (Fig. 2(f)).
Conclusions
The negative polarity of fat at readout and appropriate windowing of the image leads to complete elimination of fat signal with the new PiSCES approach. Additionally the technique is relatively insensitive to timing of the fat-selective RF pulses: fat appears black as long as fat has negative polarity, thus the method has potential to be more robust across a variety of imaging conditions.
References
Foo TK, et al: JMRI. 2007, 927-
Kellman P, et al: MRM. 2002, 372-
Janich MA, et al: ISMRM. 2014, 2446-
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
About this article
Cite this article
Janich, M.A., Wolff, S. & Brau, A.C. Phase-Sensitive ChEmical Selection (PiSCES) method for fat signal removal in LGE. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 18 (Suppl 1), O54 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-O54
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-O54
Keywords
- Late Gadolinium Enhancement
- Inversion Recovery
- Negative Polarity
- Longitudinal Magnetization
- Inversion Recovery Pulse