Skip to content


Volume 18 Supplement 1

19th Annual SCMR Scientific Sessions

  • Poster presentation
  • Open Access

Breath-held high-resolution cardiac T2 mapping with SKRATCH

  • 1,
  • 1, 2,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1, 2 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201618 (Suppl 1) :P27

  • Published:


  • Myocardial Area
  • Radial Acquisition
  • Cardiac Edema
  • Weighted Image Contrast
  • Undersampling Artifact


Several cardiac T2 mapping techniques with varying T2 preparation (T2Prep) times have been proposed for the quantification of cardiac edema [13]. Among these, radial T2 mapping, which is robust to motion artifacts, suffers from a low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) caused by the undersampling of the k-space periphery and by its density compensation function (DCF) (Fig. 1a). However, since the contrast of an image is mainly determined by the center of its k-space, the T2-weighted images can share their k-space periphery using the KWIC (K-space Weighted Image Contrast) filter (Fig. 1b) to reduce undersampling artifacts [4]. This allows for higher undersampling (Fig. 1c) and thus for a decrease in acquisition time [5].
Figure 1
Figure 1

Schematic overview of the KWIC filter. a. A radial k-space sampling pattern shown below its DCF along one radial line. The DCF is used to weigh the k-space points. b. Three similar k-spaces that share their periphery through the KWIC filter, thus increasing the local sampling density and decreasing the local weight attributed by the DCF. The radii outside of which data were added were defined through the Nyquist criterion. c. An undersampled KWIC-filtered k-space. While the number of lines has decreased, the periphery of k-space still has a higher sampling density than the standard radial k-space in a.

We demonstrated that navigator-gated KWIC-filtered cardiac T2 mapping (Shared K-space RAdial T2 Characterization of the Heart, SKRATCH) enables a considerable decrease in acquisition time while maintaining the T2 precision [5]. The goal of this study was to extend this approach to a short breath-held high-resolution T2 map acquisition and to compare its performance to navigator-gated T2 mapping.


The novel breath-held SKRATCH protocol consisted of a GRE sequence with a continuously increasing golden-angle radial acquisition. This ensured a unique k-space trajectory for all 64 lines of each of the 4 T2Prep durations (0/30/45/60 ms), pixel size of 1.2 × 1.2 × 8 mm3 and a total duration of 7 heartbeats. As reference, a navigator-gated radial cardiac T2 mapping GRE sequence was acquired with 3 T2Prep durations (0/30/60 ms), 308 lines/image and a pixel size of 1.25 × 1.25 × 5 mm3 [3]. Images were acquired at 3T (Magnetom Prisma, Siemens Healthcare) in 17 healthy volunteers at the same midventricular short-axis orientation with both protocols. The T2 maps were segmented according to the AHA guidelines [6]. The mean T2 value (μT2) and the relative standard deviation (σR = standard deviation/ μT2) of each segment as well as the myocardial area were calculated and tested for significant differences. The SKRATCH T2 map was acquired twice in 11 of the volunteers for Bland-Altman reproducibility analysis.


The SKRATCH T2 maps had average values of 39.9 ± 4.4 ms, while those of the reference T2 maps were 39.1 ± 3.1 ms (p = 0.04, Fig. 2a-c). σR increased from 8 ± 2% for the standard T2 maps to 11 ± 2% for the SKRATCH T2 maps (p < 0.001). The myocardial area decreased from 643 ± 155 to 585 ± 121 pixels for the SKRATCH T2 maps (a 10% decrease, p = 0.008). The repeatability analysis resulted in a confidence interval of ± 3.09 ms (Fig. 2d).
Figure 2
Figure 2

A comparison of navigator-gated and breath-held high-resolution T 2 maps in healthy volunteers. a,b. The standard navigator-gated T2 map and breath-held SKRATCH T2 map respectively. Note that the maps are homogeneous and have similar myocardial surface available for analysis. The color bar indicates the T2 relaxation time in ms. c. The mean T2 values and standard deviations of the 17 healthy volunteers show a slight increase in standard deviation for the breath-held SKRATCH acquisition. d. The Bland-Altman analysis of the difference in mean T2 values for 11 volunteers. The dotted line represents the mean with a bias of 0.28, while the continuous lines represent the 95% confidence interval (1.96 × standard deviation).


The SKRATCH T2 maps were highly similar to the reference high-resolution T2 maps, while the shortening to breath-hold duration came at the cost of an acceptably small increase in standard deviation and decrease in myocardial area. These encouraging results will need to be validated in future high-resolution studies in patients.

Authors’ Affiliations

University Hospital (CHUV) and University of Lausanne (UNIL), Lausanne, Switzerland
Center for Biomedical Imaging (CIBM), Lausanne and Geneva, Switzerland


  1. Foltz , et al: MRM. 2003Google Scholar
  2. Giri , et al: JCMR. 2009Google Scholar
  3. van Heeswijk , et al: JACCImaging. 2012Google Scholar
  4. Song , et al: MRM. 2000Google Scholar
  5. Lugand , et al: ISMRM. 2015, 23: P28-Google Scholar
  6. Cerqueira , et al: Cir. 2002Google Scholar