- Walking poster presentation
- Open Access
Comparison of derived strain values of myocardial regions, levels, and segments by field strength and temporal resolution via cine bSSFP MR imaging
https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-Q16
© Keller et al. 2016
- Published: 27 January 2016
Keywords
- Field Strength
- Temporal Resolution
- Circumferential Strain
- Myocardial Region
- Myocardial Strain
Background
Non-invasive assessment of myocardial strain has many promising implications in the early detection and management of cardiac disease. Preliminary work at our institution has shown deformation field analysis of balanced steady state free precision (bSSFP) cine MR images to compare favorably with speckle-tracking echocardiography. We have also illustrated that global strain values obtained by this MR-based technique demonstrate good agreement across field strengths and temporal resolutions in healthy volunteers. To further delineate the potential of this technique, we assessed strain values across field strengths and temporal resolutions for myocardial regions (endo-, meso-, and epicardium), levels (base, mid, and apex), and smaller divisions (segments) within each region and level.
Methods
9 healthy volunteers (6 men, 44.3 ± 13.5 years) underwent imaging at 1.5T (MAGNETOM Aera, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen) and 3.0T (MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens Healthcare GmbH, Erlangen). Segmented bSSFP retrospectively ECG-gated cinegraphic imaging was performed and three short-axis slices acquired with temporal resolutions of 12.5 and 39.2 msec. Myocardial contouring in short axis views was generated via a previously described algorithm. Radial and circumferential strain values were then derived using an inverse consistent deformable registration algorithm on investigational prototype software. Peak and average peak strain values for myocardial regions, levels, and segments were compared across field strengths and temporal resolutions via two-tailed, paired t-tests.
Results
p values for example peak strain data comparisons
Peak Strain | LV Circumferential | LV Radial | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Endo | Meso | Epi | Endo | Meso | Epi |
12.5 msec, 1.5T v. 3.0T | 0.86 | 0.82 | 0.14 | 0.18 | 0.56 | 0.50 |
39.2 msec, 1.5T v. 3.0T | 0.14 | 0.27 | 0.50 | 0.49 | 0.97 | 0.67 |
1.5T, 12.5 v. 39.2 msec | 0.14 | 0.85 | 0.01** | 0.20 | 0.88 | 0.45 |
3.0T, 12.5 v. 39.2 msec | 0.75 | 0.21 | 0.06* | 0.71 | 0.91 | 0.71 |
Endo v. Meso | Meso v. Epi | Epi v. Endo | Endo v. Meso | Meso v. Epi | Epi v. Endo | |
12.5 msec, 1.5T | <0.01** | 0.10* | <0.01** | 0.02** | 0.16 | 0.02** |
12.5 msec, 3.0T | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | 0.65 | 0.08* |
39.2 msec, 1.5T | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | 0.93 | 0.29 |
39.2 msec, 3.0T | <0.01** | <0.01** | <0.01** | 0.04** | 0.32 | 0.08* |
Average peak strain for myocardial regions and levels
Peak Strain | LV Circumferential | LV Radial | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Region | Endo | Meso | Epi | Endo | Meso | Epi |
12.5 msec, 1.5T | -27.59 | -24.36 | -22.38 | 69.63 | 77.26 | 80.97 |
12.5 msec, 3.0T | -28.77 | -25.03 | -21.71 | 75.05 | 75.05 | 76.53 |
39.2 msec, 1.5T | -29.58 | -24.62 | -20.40 | 59.54 | 73.41 | 72.55 |
39.2 msec, 3.0T | -26.95 | -23.05 | -19.66 | 61.07 | 70.58 | 74.34 |
LV Level | Basal | Mid | Apical | Basal | Mid | Apical |
12.5 msec, 1.5T | -16.34 | -17.78 | -16.21 | 37.56 | 45.65 | 27.18 |
12.5 msec, 3.0T | -15.98 | -17.24 | -18.63 | 32.44 | 42.13 | 33.88 |
39.2 msec, 1.5T | -16.02 | -16.87 | -20.39 | 37.07 | 42.05 | 35.75 |
39.2 msec, 3.0T | -14.26 | -15.23 | -18.08 | 27.47 | 32.45 | 25.97 |
Conclusions
These results suggest deformation field analysis of bSSFP cine MR images is similar to speckle-tracking echocardiography in being sensitive to changes in global strain data for myocardial regions and levels but inconsistent for smaller areas of the myocardium. Although this technique has the advantage of enabling strain analysis of routine bSSFP cine sequences and avoiding limiting acquisition windows and operator-dependence seen with echocardiography, further development is needed to generate robust myocardial strain data at the segmental level.
Authors’ Affiliations
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
