- Walking poster presentation
- Open Access
Overall impact of outpatient stress cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging on clinical care is independent of appropriate use criteria
© McGraw et al. 2016
- Published: 27 January 2016
- Coronary Angiography
- Clinical Care
- Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
- Active Change
- Medication Change
Stress cardiac-magnetic-resonance (CMR) imaging can provide important diagnostic and prognostic information in patients with known or suspected coronary artery disease. However, given the rising costs of imaging, there is increasing pressure to provide evidence for direct additive impact on clinical care. Appropriate use criteria (AUC) have been developed by professional organizations as a response to rising costs, with the goal of optimizing test-patient selection. Consequently, the AUC are now increasingly used by third-party-payers to assess reimbursement. However, these criteria were created by expert consensus with limited systematic validation. The aim of this study was to determine whether the AUC can predict rates of active change in clinical care resulting from stress CMR.
305 consecutive outpatients referred from cardiology clinic for stress CMR were prospectively enrolled at a U.S. university teaching hospital. Definitions for "active change in clinical care" due to stress CMR were pre-defined and classified by two cardiologists directly from medical records and/or from patients. Categories included: coronary angiography, revascularization, pre-operative clearance, medication change, subspecialty referral, ordering of additional diagnostic testing, and discharge from cardiology clinic. Tests were classified as "appropriate", "may be appropriate" or "rarely appropriate" according to the "2013 Multimodality Appropriate Use Criteria for the Detection and Risk Assessment of Stable Ischemic Heart Disease."
Stress CMR made a significant clinical impact on management, resulting in active change in clinical care in 67% of patients, with the majority of changes being non-invasive. However, overall rates of active change in clinical care were similar across AUC categories (p = 0.732). This suggests that consideration should be given to upgrading some of the "rarely appropriate" indications to either "may be appropriate" or "appropriate" classifications.
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.