Skip to main content

SCMR Position Paper (2020) on clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance


The Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) last published its comprehensive expert panel report of clinical indications for CMR in 2004. This new Consensus Panel report brings those indications up to date for 2020 and includes the very substantial increase in scanning techniques, clinical applicability and adoption of CMR worldwide. We have used a nearly identical grading system for indications as in 2004 to ensure comparability with the previous report but have added the presence of randomized controlled trials as evidence for level 1 indications. In addition to the text, tables of the consensus indication levels are included for rapid assimilation and illustrative figures of some key techniques are provided.


Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) is established in clinical practice for the diagnosis and management of diseases of the cardiovascular system. However, current guidelines for when this technique should be employed in clinical practice have not been revised since the previous Consensus Panel report of 2004 [1]. Considerable technical and practice advances have been made in the intervening years and the level of interest from clinicians in this field is at an unprecedented level. This Consensus Panel report updates these guidelines. As CMR is a multidisciplinary technique with international interest, the Consensus Panel was composed of European and American cardiologists and radiologists, all of whom are internationally recognized experts in the field of CMR, actively practice CMR and have played important roles in its development and clinical application. The coordinating authors (Leiner and Pennell) assembled the list of experts at the request of the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) Executive Committee, ensuring coverage of all classes of indications. This list was subsequently approved by the SCMR Executive Committee as well as the Board of Trustees prior to the start of the writing process. The Consensus Panel was originated, approved and funded in its activities by the SCMR.

The Consensus Panel recommendations are based on evidence compiled from the literature and expert experience. Consensus on the evidence classes was achieved by a modified Delphi process. First the section (co-)authors suggested evidence classes for the indications in their respective sections. These were reviewed by all other authors in at least three written rounds of commentary. Evidence classes were finalized with all authors of the documents present in a telephone conference. When insufficient evidence is present in the literature, this is indicated in the report and recommendations are made conservatively under these circumstances. The appropriateness of using CMR is described for the frequent disease entities where imaging information may be warranted. The diagnostic use of CMR will be described in the context of other, competing non-invasive imaging techniques, with particular emphasis on the differential indications with respect to echocardiography.

The usefulness of CMR in specific diseases is summarized by means of the following classification:

  • Class I = provides clinically relevant information and is usually appropriate; may be used as first line imaging technique; usually supported by substantial literature or randomised controlled trial(s).

  • Class II = provides clinically relevant information and is frequently useful; other techniques may provide similar information; supported by limited literature.

  • Class III = provides clinically relevant information but is infrequently used because information from other imaging techniques is usually adequate.

  • Class Inv = potentially useful, but still investigational.

This classification is not meant to equate to American Heart Association/American (AHA), American College of Cardiology (ACC) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) consensus documents. We have used nearly the identical classification system that was used for the original Consensus Panel report of 2004, in order to maintain parity with that report so that advances in the field can be readily identified. Because of broad variation in the number of relevant papers between topics, we did not use an arbitrary number of papers for each class. Class 1 indications required the highest level of evidence, for example affirmative randomized controlled trials (RCT) results for use of perfusion CMR. The categories were populated by consensus. The quality of the publications (impact factor, RCT or not, etc.) was germane to the Consensus Panel discussion of ranking of class throughout the discussions. Thus, the only change from 2004 is to add the positive outcome of RCTs in CMR as evidence for level 1 indications. It should also be noted that the classification system for imaging technologies does not easily accord with that of therapeutic trials because the datasets are smaller, multicentre trials are uncommon and randomized controlled trials the exception. The continuing technical and clinical advances in CMR will change the indication’s tables, and therefore between formal reports, the Consensus Panel may post updates online.

Congenital heart disease

CMR is a well-established modality for the diagnosis and follow-up of patients with congenital heart disease (CHD) (Table 1). This is because it provides unrestricted evaluation of the intracardiac and vascular anatomy, and reference standard measurements of the ventricles and blood flow. In general, transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) continues to be used as the first-line method of assessing cardiovascular anatomy and function in patients with CHD. However, when acoustic window limitations preclude an adequate assessment or more reliable quantification of ventricular parameters and blood flow is required, CMR is often indicated. In addition, the tissue characterization capabilities of CMR (e.g. fibrosis detection) can have a significant impact on patient management [2,3,4,5,6]. CMR has also been used to replace invasive diagnostic catheterization for assessment of CHD as it provides comparable anatomic information without exposure to ionizing radiation or the risks of an invasive procedure [7, 8]. CMR’s advantages over computed tomography (CT) include again the avoidance of ionizing radiation along with superior ventricular function assessment, blood flow measurement, and tissue characterization.

Table 1 Indications for CMR in congenital heart disease

When performing CMR in CHD patients, it is important to tailor the acquisition parameters to the faster heart rates and smaller structures in children, as well as the limited breath-holding ability of children and poorly compensated adult CHD patients. It is also necessary to have thorough knowledge of CHD anatomy and the extensive array of surgical and catheter interventions. Therefore, it is highly recommended that CMR in CHD patients is performed in centers with sufficient experience and expertise.


In younger children with CHD, TTE is often sufficient for initial diagnosis. However, CMR can provide important additional information in lesions with complex intracardiac anatomy or vascular abnormalities. In adults with CHD, TTE is often limited by poor image quality and reduced field of view. Thus, CMR with its reliable visualization of intracardiac and vascular anatomy takes on a central role in the routine non-invasive imaging of these patients. This indication has been recognized in recent guidelines regarding multi-modality imaging and the management of adults with CHD [9,10,11]. Another key indication for CMR in CHD is the assessment of ventricular volumes, mass, and function. The clear delineation of endocardial and epicardial borders, and ability to quantify without geometric assumptions have established CMR as the clinical reference standard [12,13,14]. The advantages of CMR are particularly valuable for right ventricular (RV) assessment as its retrosternal position and complex shape make it difficult to reliably assess by TTE. This capability is especially relevant in CHD as many lesions are associated with a RV pressure or volume load. Several studies have demonstrated good reproducibility of RV measurements by CMR in CHD underscoring its suitability for serial assessment [15,16,17,18]. A final important general indication for CMR is assessment of blood flow. Multiple studies have shown that it provides accurate measurement of cardiac output and the pulmonary-to-systemic flow (Qp:Qs) ratio compared to invasive techniques [19,20,21].

Shunt lesions

For shunt lesions, CMR is used to delineate anatomy and determine physiological importance through measurement of the Qp:Qs ratio and ventricular volumes. This is vital information for determining the necessity and timing of surgical or catheter interventions. Studies have shown that CMR can provide definitive diagnosis and evaluation of sinus venosus defects and anomalous pulmonary venous connection [22, 23] (Fig. 1). This is relevant as these lesions are difficult to image with TTE, particularly in older patients. Several studies have also shown that CMR provides a comprehensive evaluation of the morphology and physiological importance of secundum atrial septal defects, and can determine candidacy for transcatheter or surgical closure [24,25,26]. CMR may be especially useful in adult patients who have findings (e.g., murmur or RV dilation) that raise a suspicion for an atrial septal defect or other shunt lesion that is not definitively resolved by TTE. Here, CMR provides a non-invasive alternative to transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) with better sensitivity for anomalous pulmonary venous connections. Patent foramen ovale is usually diagnosed with echocardiography though there are CMR techniques to address this question [27, 28]. Ventricular septal defects are generally diagnosed and managed using echocardiography. However, CMR with 3D imaging may be useful for delineation of complex or multiple defects [29]. In addition, CMR measurement of the Qp:Qs ratio and left ventricular (LV) volume may be important in determining management in older children and adults [9]. Most patients with atrioventricular septal defects are diagnosed in childhood by TTE and undergo surgical repair. Subsequently, atrioventricular valve regurgitation may develop and CMR provides a reliable quantitative assessment of its severity [30, 31] and insight into its mechanism [32]. Patent ductus arteriosus and aorto-pulmonary window typically present in infancy where echocardiography is usually adequate for diagnosis and management. When this evaluation is insufficient or the patient is older, CMR techniques can be used to define the vascular anatomy and assess the magnitude of the shunt. In patients with systemic-to-pulmonary artery collaterals, CMR can be used to quantify the amount of collateral flow [33, 34] and identify larger vessels that may be suitable for catheter interventions.

Fig. 1

Balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) cine images through a superior sinus venosus defect (*): a sagittal oblique view, b transverse oblique also showing anomalously draining right pulmonary veins

Valve lesions

CHD may be associated with abnormalities in the cardiac valves. Echocardiography is often the primary modality for assessing valve morphology and function. CMR is principally used to evaluate the physiological impact of valve regurgitation by measuring the regurgitation volume, regurgitant fraction, and ventricular size and function. This information plays an important role in deciding the timing of mechanical interventions. With valve stenosis, CMR can be used to define orifice size [35] but may underestimate the peak velocity and estimated pressure gradient [36]. In unrepaired Ebstein’s anomaly, CMR assessment of the abnormal tricuspid valve leaflets, tricuspid regurgitation, and RV volumes and function can be used to determine the suitability for operative repair [37, 38] and predict major adverse cardiac events and atrial arrhythmia [39]. Following repair, CMR can demonstrate the extent of ventricular remodeling [40, 41].

Arterial lesions

Congenital abnormalities of the aorta, pulmonary arteries, and coronary arteries may occur in isolation or in association with other CHD lesions. The ability to assess these structures by echocardiography becomes progressively more difficult as patients become larger, and CMR angiography techniques serve as an important non-invasive alternative [42,43,44]. In coarctation of the aorta, CMR is used for assessment before and after intervention (Fig. 2). In addition to delineating the anatomy [45], CMR provides information on severity through assessment of the peak velocity at the obstruction site, extent of collateral flow, and ventricular hypertrophy [46,47,48,49,50,51]. In adults, the combination of clinical assessment and CMR has been shown to provide a better “cost-effective” yield compared with a combination that relies on echocardiography as the primary imaging modality [52]. Vascular rings can be fully delineated using CMR, including the trachea and main bronchi to identify associated compression [53, 54]. CMR reliably depicts congenital abnormalities in the course of the proximal coronary arteries [55, 56], and diagnosis has been shown to predict major adverse cardiac events [57]. Compared to X-ray angiography, CMR better demonstrates the coronary course with respect to the semilunar valves [58], which is crucial for risk-stratification and surgical planning. CMR provides an accurate assessment of main and branch pulmonary artery dimensions [44]. In the setting of branch pulmonary artery stenosis, it can quantify differential lung perfusion [59, 60], which has been shown to better predict symptoms than anatomic measurements [61]. Lastly, CMR has been used to diagnose supravalvar aortic stenosis and characterize its physiological importance [62].

Fig. 2

Multiple CMR methods of imaging coarctation of the aorta: a sagittal oblique 2D black blood, b maximal intensity projection gadolinium enhanced CMR angiogram (CMRA) and c volume rendering of gadolinium enhanced CMRA

Conotruncal lesions

Conotruncal lesions include tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries (TGA), double outlet RV, and truncus arteriosus, among others. The primary imaging modality for these conditions in younger children is echocardiography. CMR may augment the preoperative assessment of double outlet RV by better characterizing the intracardiac anatomy, particularly through use of virtual and 3D printed models [29, 63]. CMR can also be used define the pulmonary blood supply including aorto-pulmonary collaterals in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia [8]. In older children and adults with repaired conotruncal lesions, CMR assumes an important role as the clinical concerns often involve the pulmonary arteries, aorta, coronary arteries, pulmonary valve, intracardiac baffles, and RV, all relative strengths compared to echocardiography. In patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot, CMR-derived parameters inform risk-stratification [3, 64,65,66] and referral for pulmonary valve replacement [67,68,69], and figure prominently in published clinical management guidelines [9,10,11, 70]. In patients with d-loop TGA who have undergone an atrial switch procedure, CMR is used to evaluate the atrial baffles, and systemic RV volumes, function [18], and scar [2]; abnormal findings have been shown to predict outcome [71]. For d-loop TGA patients who have had an arterial switch operation, CMR indications include monitoring for pulmonary artery stenosis, semilunar valve regurgitation, and coronary artery obstruction [72,73,74]. Congenitally-corrected TGA patients require CMR for surveillance of their systemic RV; those who are post-operative need assessment of intracardiac baffles, arterial conduits, coronary stenosis, and ventricular function [75, 76]. The surgical repair of patients with truncus arteriosus as well as other conotruncal lesions may include the placement of a ventricle-to-pulmonary artery conduit and these are prone to develop stenosis and regurgitation over time. TTE imaging is often difficult due to the retrosternal position of the conduit while CMR provides accurate anatomic and functional assessment [75,76,77,78].

Complex lesions

The reliable visualization of intracardiac and vascular anatomy, large field of view, and 3D imaging capabilities all make CMR well-suited for the diagnosis of complex cardiovascular anatomic arrangements, such as those seen in more severe forms of heterotaxy syndrome [79, 80]. CMR is a non-invasive alternative to invasive cardiac catheterization and often provides a more comprehensive evaluation than echocardiography. CMR also has an important role in the diagnostic evaluation and serial follow-up of patients with single ventricle heart disease. TTE is the primary imaging tool during the initial evaluation since most patients present in the newborn period and their acoustic windows are typically adequate; in some cases, CMR may be used to determine whether a one versus two-ventricle repair should be pursued [81, 82]. Studies have shown that later in their course, CMR outperforms TTE and can substitute for routine diagnostic catheterization in selected patients prior to the bidirectional Glenn shunt or a hemi-Fontan procedure (second-stage palliation) [7, 83,84,85], and prior to the Fontan procedure (third-stage palliation) [86,87,88]. Moreover, CMR measurements of systemic-to-pulmonary artery collateral flow predict post-operative outcomes such as hospital length of stay [89,90,91]. Following the Fontan procedure, patients remain at risk for numerous complications including ventricular and valve dysfunction, Fontan baffle obstruction, pulmonary artery stenosis, aortic coarctation, systemic-to-pulmonary venous collateral formation, and intracardiac thrombus formation. CMR has a key role in surveillance for these complications as the evaluation by TTE alone is often incomplete [92, 93]. Finally, CMR-derived parameters such as ventricular volume and myocardial fibrosis have been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes [5, 94].

Acquired vascular disease

CMR is a highly reliable modality for depiction of the presence and extent of acquired vascular disease in virtually all of the large and medium sized arteries in the body (Table 2). A variety of techniques exist to depict both the vascular lumen as well as the vessel wall. The current standard of reference is contrast-enhanced (CE) CMRA. CE-CMRA is obtained during first arterial passage of an intravenous bolus injection of gadolinium-based contrast agents (GBCA). On modern CMR scanners, virtually all CE-CMRA applications can be performed with a single dose of contrast agent (0.1 mmol/kg). If the area of interest exceeds a single field-of-view (FOV), as is the case for total body or lower extremity artery imaging, a moving table protocol can be used whereby the contrast bolus is followed over multiple FOV by rapid table movement. Typical spatial resolution is in the order of 1.0 × 1.0 (in-plane) × 1.0–2.0 (slice thickness) mm3. On modern hardware this high spatial resolution can be obtained in a single breath hold, which is necessary for chest and abdominal CE-CMRA. For some clinical indications it is advisable to use a multi-phase dynamic acquisition as this can provide information about the direction of blood flow as well as information about tissue perfusion. Since dynamic CE-CMRA demands a higher temporal resolution this typically comes at the expense of spatial resolution. In selected cases it can therefore be useful to perform both acquisitions with two separate injections of contrast agent. Although the vast majority of CE-CMRA studies are performed with GBCA, a substantial body of literature has been published on the use of ferumoxytol as a CMRA contrast agent. Ferumoxytol is an intravenous iron preparation for treatment of the anemia of chronic kidney disease [95]. It is a carbohydrate-coated, superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticle that leads to prolonged intravascular enhancement when patients are imaged with CE-CMRA sequences. Ferumoxytol-enhanced CE-CMRA can be obtained with much higher spatial resolution due to the much longer intravascular half-life of this contrast agent [96]. This pharmacokinetic profile can be advantageous when both high spatial resolution as well as cardiac and/or respiratory synchronization is desired, or in patients with contra-indications for administration of GBCA.

Table 2 Indications for CMR in acquired diseases of the vasculature

Over the past few years all major hardware vendors have also introduced non-contrast or native CMRA sequences on their platforms. These sequences utilize intrinsic contrast between flowing blood and stationary tissues as the basis to generate angiograms. Different technical approaches are also well described [97]. Major advantages of non-contrast CMRA include cost-savings and improved patient safety. They are also the optimal CMR technique for assessing aortic dissection as the dissection flap in better visualized than with CE-CMRA. Disadvantages include the slightly longer time needed for acquisition (several minutes compared to < 1 min for CE-CMRA), marginally lower spatial resolution, and reduced ability to provide 3D surface rendered images.

In addition to angiography, the wide variety of soft tissue contrast available on CMR (proton density, T1, T2, lipid-saturation) can be applied to vascular imaging to assess features of vessel wall such as haematoma/thrombus, inflammation, and atherosclerotic plaque. In addition to morphologic imaging of blood vessels, velocity mapping can be used to assess and measure the blood flow. Blood velocity and flow can be integrated across the cardiac cycle and the vessel lumen for reliable volume flow measurements. This information is complementary to the anatomical information obtained with the luminographic techniques and can add value in many clinical scenarios [98].


CMR techniques are well-suited to depict the thoracic and abdominal aorta. The high spatial resolution can be used for accurate assessment of aortic size, diameter and the presence and morphology of aortic aneurysms. The near isotropic spatial resolution ensures high quality multi-planar reformations (MPRs) which can be used to generate an accurate center-lumen line as well as depiction of side branches. Black blood techniques have been superseded by CE-CMRA and non-contrast CMRA techniques. The latter technique is particularly useful because image acquisition is typically synchronized to the diastolic rest period which greatly improves evaluation of the aortic root and leads to sharper aortic wall delineation because there is no blurring due to vessel pulsatility (Fig. 3). The advantage of CE-CMRA however is the ability to perform a multiphasic acquisition which can be used to depict contrast agent dynamics. Post-gadolinium T1-weighted CMR, especially with fat saturation, is helpful in identifying areas of peri-aortic inflammation in mycotic aneurysms or suspected vasculitis [99,100,101]. Inflammatory aortic aneurysms can have a thick rind of tissue encircling the anterior and lateral aspects of the aorta, which typically enhances with gadolinium [102]. Although not as widely used as CT for pre- and post-operative evaluation of aortic stent-grafts, CMR provides comparable information with regard to pre-stent anatomy but is more sensitive for detection of post-stent leaks for certain stent types [103,104,105]. A limitation of CMR used to be its inability to visualize calcium, which is important for stent graft planning. However, a recent study has shown the feasibility of a novel CMR sequence to accurately depict arterial calcifications with excellent agreement to CT angiography (CTA) [106].

Fig. 3

61-year old male followed up after ascending aorta replacment for Stanford type A ascending aortic dissection. Balanced steady state free precession (bSSFP) non-contrast CMRA of the ascending aorta synchronized to the diastolic rest period shows the aortic root and origin of the right coronary artery without motion artefacts. Note artefacts due to sternal wires

Another important component of the aortic imaging protocol is measurement of flow. Although 2D flow sequences are still the most widely used technique, there is high interest protocols that allow determination of flow in a three-dimensional volume over the cardiac cycle (also known as ‘4D flow’). This can be particularly interesting in the chest since it enables simultaneous imaging of flow in the cardiac chambers as well as the large vessels in a single acquisition [107].

Acute thoracic aortic syndromes include aortic dissection and limited intimal tear, intramural hematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer [108]. Aortic dissection remains a well-established indication for CMR although CT may be more widely available in the acute setting and dealing with acutely ill patients can be complicated in the CMR environment. A recent systematic review found that initial diagnostic evaluation with CMR had a sensitivity of 95–100% and a specificity of 94–98%, which is comparable to CT and TEE; and superior to TTE or serologic biomarkers [109]. Black blood imaging can reveal the location and extent of the dissection flap and dynamic CE-CMRA can be used assess filling dynamics of the true and false lumen. 4D flow imaging can be used to visualize and quantify flow in both lumina as well as through any fenestrations (Fig. 4). Due to the outstanding soft tissue contrast, imaging of the aortic wall is a particular strength of CMR. Intramural hematoma (IMH) is a variant of dissection, where the false channel in the aortic wall is filled with thrombus. No primary dissection flap will be visible and two-lumen flow is absent. In IMH with hyperacute bleeding, T2-weighted images display hyperintense signal in the hematoma, whereas signal is isointense on T1-weighted images. After approximately first 24 h, the IMH will appear hyperintense on both T1- and T2-weighted images. These features help differentiate IMH from mural thrombus, which appears hypointense or isointense on both T1- and T2-weighted sequences [110]. The use of fat-saturation techniques is helpful to distinguish IMH from the mediastinal fat surrounding the aorta. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer is a form of dissection where there is intimal erosion with ulceration extending through the internal elastic lamina into the media and/or focal IMH [111, 112]. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer is a cause of aortic hematoma and should be distinguished from ulcer-like projection, which is a consequence of the hematoma or thrombus in the wall, and only appear after an initial IMH [113]. Differentiation of both entities is crucial since a penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer surrounded by an IMH has a higher risk of aortic rupture than an IMH complicated with a ulcer-like projection or localized dissection. A penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer with persistent pain, with an IMH or periaortic haemorrhage must be treated surgically or with thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) [112]. CE-CMRA may show a focal defect in the arterial intima and, typically, deformation of the external aortic contour. T1- and T2-weighted sequences can demonstrate focal IMH as described above.

Fig. 4

4D flow CMR velocity maximal intensity projection (MIP) (A) and time-resolved CMRA (TR-CMRA) MIP in a patient with type B aortic dissection. While TR-CMRA demonstrates dynamic filling of the proximal false lumen (FL), 4D flow exhibits a prominent entry tear jet impinging on the wall of the distal arch (white arrow). At least one smaller hemodynamically active fenestration is also seen more distal to the primary entry tear (arrowhead). TL: true lumen. Figure courtesy of Bradley D. Allen, MD MS, and Michael Markl, Ph.D., Northwestern University, Chicago, IL

CMR is also increasingly used to identify aortic atheroma as a potential source of cerebral emboli in cryptogenic stroke. A combined protocol using T1-weighted bright blood, T2- and proton-density weighted black blood and 4D flow imaging was recently shown to be capable of depicting complex aortic plaque in the aortic arch and proximal descending aorta as well as potential embolization pathways from such plaques to the brain [114].

Carotid and cervical arteries

Carotid artery CE-CMRA is a highly reliable technique to depict the presence and extent of atherosclerotic plaque formation in the aortic arch branch vessels and to measure the degree of carotid artery stenosis [115]. Advances in CMR hardware such as dedicated coils and the introduction of high spatial and temporal resolution CE-CMRA pulse sequences have enabled sub-millimeter isotropic voxel sizes in short imaging times using K-space view sharing techniques [116]. Venous overlap can be avoided by using centric K-space ordering. Promising results have also been obtained with non-contrast enhanced techniques [117].

Pulmonary arteries

Advances in CMR hardware and pulse sequence design have enabled high-fidelity depiction of the pulmonary arteries and veins in short imaging times [118]. The most common acquired disease of the pulmonary arteries is pulmonary embolism (PE) and CMRA can function as an alternative to CTA to rule out PE. The prospective multicentre CE-CMRA for pulmonary embolism (PIOPED III) study found that a technically adequate protocol that combined pulmonary CMRA and CMR venography of the peripheral veins has a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 96% compared to the reference standard [119]. However, in this study a large proportion of examinations were technically inadequate due to motion artefacts and inadequate vascular opacification [120]. For this reason, CMRA of the pulmonary arteries should only be considered in at centers that routinely perform it and in patients in whom standard tests (e.g., CTA) are contraindicated. A more recent study that combined a non-contrast and CE protocol found CMR to be practically equivalent to pulmonary CTA in patients with suspected thromboembolism [121]. Pulmonary artery CMRA remains the technique of choice for integrated cardiopulmonary evaluation of acquired pulmonary artery stenosis [122], evaluation of pulmonary artery aneurysms [123] and dissection [124].

Abdominal aorta, renal and mesenteric arteries

CE-CMRA remains the technique of choice for imaging the abdominal aorta and its branches. The ability to obtain high spatial resolution images of these vessels within a single breath hold enables accurate depiction of stenosis in the abdominal aorta, renal and mesenteric arteries [125]. CMRA is also well-suited to characterize aneurysmal disease of the abdominal aorta. The excellent soft tissue contrast facilitates detection and characterization of both the vascular lumen as well as mural thrombus. A combined CMRA and abdominal CMR protocol can even be used in patients with some types of abdominal aortic stents to assess the presence of endoleak after endovascular aortic aneurysm repair and has been shown to outperform multiphasic CTA for this purpose [104, 105].

For many years CE-CMRA has been an accepted modality to depict the renal arteries. Renal artery CMRA is used to visualize the number and course of the renal arteries prior to nephrectomy and dynamic CE sequences can be added to the imaging protocol to quantify renal perfusion [126]. However, since publication of the Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions (CORAL) [127] and the Angioplasty and Stenting for Renal Artery Lesions (ASTRAL) [128] trials which both demonstrated that subjects with renal artery stenosis had similar outcomes whether randomized to optimal medical therapy alone or optimal medical therapy plus renal artery stenting, clinical interest in imaging renal artery stenosis has decreased. On the other hand, the introduction of renal sympathetic denervation [129, 130] has led to a renewed interest in imaging of renal artery anatomy and non-invasive imaging of renal function. The ability to simultaneously depict renal anatomy and physiology as well as cardiac function also allows unique insights into cardiorenal function [131]. Stenosis of the celiac trunk and mesenteric arteries can also be reliably diagnosed with CMRA techniques. Although CTA is preferred in the acute setting, both techniques can be used to depict the degree of atherosclerotic narrowing and presence and extent of collateral circulation, as well as other non-atherosclerotic vascular pathologies such as fibromuscular dysplasia and compression of the celiac trunk by a median arcuate ligament [132]. In the latter condition CMRA is preferred as it allows for obtaining both inspiratory and expiratory views of the celiac trunk without radiation burden.

Lower extremity arteries

CMRA has been shown to be a highly reliable technique to depict the presence and extent of arterial narrowing in patients with intermittent claudication and chronic critical ischemia [133,134,135,136]. In most patients, atherosclerotic peripheral arterial occlusive disease is the underlying cause of arterial narrowing. The imaging protocol typically consists of acquisition of 3–4 FOVs or ‘steps’ during infusion of 0.1–0.2 mmol/kg contrast agent. Such protocols enable depiction of the peripheral vasculature from the aorta down to the feet with high vessel to background contrast [137,138,139]. The separate acquisitions are then ‘stitched’ together to provide a comprehensive overview of the peripheral vascular tree (Fig. 5). In patients with chronic critical ischemia the lower leg and pedal vasculature may be compromised by venous contamination. To avoid this problem, it is recommended to use a separate low-dose injection of contrast medium in combination with a time-resolved acquisition. Not only does this avoid the problem of venous overlay, but it also provides hemodynamic information about the flow direction in severely diseased arteries and it enables high-quality imaging of small, distal vessels in patients with differential flow in the lower extremities. To further optimize depiction of the small distal arteries it is desirable to use fat suppression. This can be done by subtraction of non-contrast-enhanced ‘mask’ images, or by using pulse sequences such as the modified Dixon technique [104]. The outstanding soft tissue contrast of CMR also enables diagnosis of alternative vascular pathologies that may lead to intermittent claudication such as popliteal entrapment, vasculitis, cystic adventitial disease, fibromuscular dysplasia and other more uncommon diseases [140].

Fig. 5

65-year-old man with bilateral Fontaine IIb peripheral arterial disease. There are bilateral common femoral artery occlusions bridged by collaterals, as well as an occluded superficial femoral artery in the left leg. Collateral arteries bridge the common femoral arteries. The right superficial femoral artery shows a high-grade stenosis (arrowhead). The tibioperoneal trunk and proximal posterior tibial artery are clearly patent (horizontal arrow). There is subtle narrowing of the proximal right renal artery (oblique arrow)

Recently, significant advances have been made in non-contrast CMRA of the peripheral vessels. Promising results have been obtained with quiescent interval single shot (QISS) CMRA. In a study in 53 patients with suspected or known peripheral arterial disease the diagnostic performance of QISS CMRA was shown to be nearly equivalent to CE-CMRA and digital subtraction angiography [141]. The same investigators also demonstrated the ability to depict areas in the arterial vessel wall containing calcium deposits [142], which further enhances the attractiveness of CMR as an alternative to CT.

Arterial wall imaging

The ability to null blood signal provides important opportunities for detection and characterization of vessel wall abnormalities with CMR. This does not only concern imaging of atherosclerotic plaque, but also inflammatory changes associated with vasculitis and rheumatological diseases. CMR vessel wall imaging has been shown to be capable of detecting, characterizing and quantifying atherosclerotic plaque in the aorta [143, 144], carotid arteries [145, 146], lower extremity arteries [147, 148] and even the coronary [149, 150] and intracranial arteries [151, 152]. The large FOV allows depiction of arterial wall changes over large anatomical trajectories. The imaging protocol typically consists T1-, T2- and proton density weighted images which enables identification of lipid-rich necrotic core and intra-plaque haemorrhage – the two most important features that portend plaque rupture and clinical sequelae –with high sensitivity and specificity [146]. More recently, combined angiographic and black blood imaging sequences have been described that allow fast, simultaneous imaging of the vasculature as well as the presence of intraplaque haemorrhage [153]. T1 and T2 vessel wall mapping protocols are now also becoming available and may remove some of the subjectivity of conventional T1- and T2-weighted sequences [154].

In patients with suspected or known large and medium vessel vasculitis, 3D fat-suppressed black-blood T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences have been of particular value to depict inflammatory changes such as post-contrast vessel wall enhancement in the aorta and its branches [144], extra- and intracranial carotid artery and its branches [155, 156], as well as the cerebral arteries [157].

Pulse wave velocity

Early atherosclerotic changes in the arterial wall lead to outward remodelling and are not yet visible as luminal narrowing, which limits the utility of angiographic techniques. Pulse wave velocity (PWV) is a biomarker of arterial stiffness, which is known to increase long before the advent of stenosis. CMR is the technique of choice to measure PWV because it is a highly reliable for measurement of vessel length and vascular velocity waveforms at different locations in a vessel. The pulse wave can be understood as a wave superimposed on the flow/pressure waveform of the blood. This superimposed pulse wave accelerates and decelerates as it traverses distally in the vasculature relative to the stiffness of the vessel in a given segment [158]. PWV is arguably one of the earliest markers of atherosclerosis and alterations in aortic PWV have been shown to be related to the level of insulin resistance in children with type-1 diabetes mellitus [159], to blood pressure, body mass index and levels of expression of cellular adhesion molecules [160] in young adults [161], as well as cognitive decline in the elderly [162].

Arterial reactivity

Another CMR based method to non-invasively assess vascular function is artery reactivity. Endothelial function can be examined non-invasively with stimuli which cause arterial vasodilation. Flow mediated dilation is used to examine endothelial function directly, by occluding usually the forearm using a blood pressure cuff inflated above systolic pressure for a standard time period. On release of the cuff, reactive hyperaemia causes increased endothelial shear and the release of nitric oxide which causes the brachial artery to dilate. Endothelial independent responses can also be tested by using glyceryl trinitrate, typically as a sublingual spray. Visualisation of brachial dilation with these stimuli was first described using ultrasound [163], but it may be difficult to ensure that the transducer is correctly positioned perpendicular to the artery and without movement, and that repeated measurements are made with good reproducibility. CMR techniques are considered to have advantages in both these areas and comparisons of CMR and ultrasound for accuracy and reproducibility favour CMR [164]. In addition to measuring brachial dilation, CMR can also measure flow changes directly in response to the standard stimuli [165, 166] and has been used to assess residual signs of vascular damage after repair of aortic coarctation [167]. Vascular reactivity can also be measured in lower extremity arteries and, more so than in the forearm arteries, has been shown to be progressively reduced with an increase in cardiovascular risk factors [168].

Venous system

The main indications for imaging the central veins are assessment of suspected anatomical variants and follow-up of patients with CHD [169], mapping of pulmonary venous anatomy [170], vena cava superior syndrome [171] as well as assessment of the central veins prior to creation of upper extremity vascular access in patients with renal dysfunction [172]. CMR venography is also increasingly used to assess the peripheral venous system in patients with venous compression syndromes [173], venous anomalies [174], and suspected or known deep venous thrombosis of both the upper [175] and lower extremities [176].

Both CE and non-contrast CMRA techniques can be used for depiction of the venous system. For imaging of chest veins non contrast cardiac triggered and respiratory navigator-gated bSSFP techniques can provide excellent image quality in short imaging times [177] and is often sufficient to answer the clinical question. CE-CMR venography can be performed with both extracellular as well as blood pool contrast agents. The approximate intravascular half-life of extracellular chelates is around 60–120 s [178]. Thus, when a conventional extracellular contrast agent is used, rapid leakage of the contrast agent into the interstitial space will reduce enhancement of both the arteries and the veins shortly after injection. In order to obtain good quality images of the venous system it is therefore mandatory to initiate the acquisition immediately after the first pass of the contrast agent. An alternative strategy is to use the blood pool agent ferumoxytol, which has a much longer intravascular half-life, and thereby facilitates ultra-high spatial resolution depiction of both the arterial as well as the venous systems with voxel sizes about one order of magnitude smaller compared to conventional CMR vascular imaging techniques [179]. This contrast agent has been shown to be of high value in patients with CHD [180], imaging of central [181], abdominal [182] and peripheral veins [183].

Coronary artery disease

Coronary artery disease (CAD) spans a broad range of acquired and congenital coronary artery abnormalities. The vast majority of events such as myocardial infarction (MI) result from atherosclerosis. CAD may be further classified as ‘macrovascular’—involving the epicardial segments of the coronary artery tree—or ‘microvascular’ where vasomotor, neurohormonal and other factors affect the coronary microcirculation. CMR has proven utility in addressing most aspects of CAD, illuminating mechanism of disease and guiding the selection of therapeutic strategies (Table 3).

Table 3 Indications for CMR in coronary artery disease

Acute coronary syndromes

Patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) have myocardial ischemia or injury resulting from disruption to coronary blood flow. Assessment of a standard 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) at presentation yields 2 broad categories of ACS: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST elevation events (NSTEMI). Classically, STEMI results from complete thrombotic occlusion of a coronary artery segment, whereas NSTEMI may represent subtotal occlusive or erosive CAD. Recognition of STEMI mandates rapid, uniform deployment of community-to-catheterization laboratory evaluation and management aimed at recanalization of the occluded coronary artery. No modality including CMR has shown compelling utility to support slowing down established pathways by adding imaging between presentation and coronary intervention. After invasive coronary angiography, however, CMR with its workhorse imaging technique of late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) affords in vivo visualization of myocardial injury, and hypointense regions within infarct scar indicate microvascular obstruction (MO). CMR may inform post-STEMI care when complicated by heart failure, arrhythmias, or LV dysfunction. The transmural extent of myocardial damage by LGE is inversely related to the likelihood of functional recovery, with even worse prognosis conferred with the presence of MO [184]. T2-weighted imaging combined with LGE has been used to detail the extent of myocardium that has been salvaged after revascularization in patients with STEMI [185]. Fortunately, mechanical complications post-STEMI such as papillary muscle rupture, free wall rupture and post-infarct ventricular septal defect have diminished in the era of rapid catheter-based reperfusion. However, reperfusion myocardial injury and intramyocardial hemorrhage still occur and may contribute to residual risk [186]. The comprehensive nature of CMR can fully characterize the jeopardized region in aborted STEMI, while precisely assessing the complications such as RV infarction, post MI pericarditis, and thrombus formation [187,188,189]. Contemporary mapping of myocardial T1, T2 and T2* values along with traditional LGE imaging affords detailed characterization of cardiac muscle post-STEMI, affording insights into mechanisms of adverse remodeling and other downstream complications [190].

These techniques can be used to test novel approaches to preserve myocardium in STEMI, such as optimal timing of stent placement in patients undergoing aspiration thrombectomy [191]. Incorporating CMR’s precise myocardial biomarkers has accelerated the evaluation of a number of complementary therapeutic approaches. For instance, Bulluck and colleagues [192] evaluated treatment with a mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist drug intravenously at the time of primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and continued orally for 10 weeks after PCI; CMR was performed in the first week and again after 3 months. While mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist therapy did not reduce infarct size, LV remodeling did improve. Such CMR-enabled studies advance the evidence needed to improve post-STEMI outcomes.

NSTEMI patients are more heterogeneous compared to STEMI not only in ECG findings but also in time course of presentation and revascularization. Importantly, NSTEMI comprise the vast majority of all ACS and may represent a greater opportunity for CMR to guide management. For instance, T2 imaging prior to invasive angiography in patients with NSTEMI has been shown to delineate myocardium at risk of irreversible injury, predicting both presence of CAD requiring revascularization as well as greater risk of adverse outcomes [193]. Recent trials have confirmed no advantage of early (within a few hours) vs. usual (within 72 h) timing of invasive coronary angiography (ICA) in the aggregate NSTEMI population lacking high risk features [194]. These data encourage feasibility of further trials that incorporate CMR into the evaluation of patients with NSTEMI, particularly as novel strategies emerge to protect myocardium from both ischemic as well as reperfusion injury. Incorporating CMR after angiography and randomization to either thrombectomy or standard PCI in NSTEMI, Thiele and colleagues [195] found that combining aspiration thrombectomy with PCI in NSTEMI with a thrombus-containing lesion did not reduce MO.

Chronic coronary artery disease

Symptomatic patients with known or suspected stable CAD may require evidence that symptoms are a result of CAD. Delineation of ischemic myocardium with stress myocardial perfusion imaging can guide coronary artery revascularization, targeting ischemic segments towards relief of symptoms (Fig. 6). Several head-to-head trials now endorse stress CMR with vasodilator perfusion as a more accurate modality in evaluating the symptomatic CAD patient [196, 197], with better utilization of costly resources like ICA [198]. A subsequent substudy of CE-MARC indicated greater accuracy in left main stem or equivalent CAD, recognizing grave consequences in missing such disease [199] and the MR-INFORM trial puts stress CMR on equal footing as assessment of what many deem the gold standard for CAD severity – invasive fractional flow reserve [200].

Fig. 6

A 75 year-old male with hypertension and hyperlipidemia reported exertional dyspnea during rehabilitation post-stroke. Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) showed mild left ventricular (LV) systolic dysfunction, and he had difficulty walking. Given concern for myocardial ischemia, he was referred for CMR with stress. Late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) demonstrates a small subendocardial infarct in the basal inferior wall, while myocardial perfusion acquired during adenosine infusion (stress) shows extensive perfusion abnormality that mostly resolves on resting perfusion imaging. Cine CMR demonstrates mild segmental LV dysfunction. These findings prompted invasive coronary angiography that showed high-grade multivessel coronary artery disease (CAD); post-revascularization, functional capacity improved

In an era of more complex questions regarding native coronary artery or bypass graft anatomy amidst scarred vs viable myocardium, CMR has distinct advantages over other modalities. While single photon emission tomography (SPECT) may infer the presence of infarct scar in patients with ‘fixed defects’ e.g. reduced tracer uptake on both rest and stress perfusion images, having both LGE and perfusion imaging techniques allows CMR to better distinguish scar from hibernating myocardium [201].

For individuals presenting in the acute setting with symptoms of intermediate CAD likelihood, stress perfusion CMR accurately identifies disease and safely facilitates discharge in patients with normal results, at lower cost when compared to standard inpatient evaluation with ICA [202].

The International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches, or ISCHEMIA trial, asked—how does routine invasive therapy improve outcomes compare to optimal medical therapy in patients with stable CAD and moderate to severe myocardial ischemia on noninvasive stress testing? While analysis from the small subgroup of subjects whose testing included stress CMR is underway, the overall trial results from over 5,000 patients randomized across 320 centers in 37 countries followed for a little over 3 years are relevant to today’s CMR practice. With a cohort of over three-fourths male patients with a significant burden of diabetes (41.8%), prior MI (19.2%) and preserved LV ejection fraction (LVEF) (median 60%), the primary outcome of cardiovascular death, MI, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or hospitalization for unstable angina or heart failure was similar among routine invasive (13.3%) and medical therapy (15.5%) groups (p = 0.34). These results endorse use of an accurate, cost-effective and noninvasive modality such as stress CMR in such patients in place of invasive evaluation.

Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA)

Myocardium may suffer infarction from causes other than obstructive CAD such as plaque erosion, spontaneous coronary artery dissection, coronary artery vasospasm, and coronary artery embolization. CMR is typically called upon after ICA has not provided a definitive anatomic abnormality, and when distinction of MI from myocarditis may be difficult by symptoms such as chest pain with biomarker evidence of myocardial injury. Occasionally, the angiogram is reviewed after CMR shows the classic signature of MI—subendocardial pattern of damage by LGE—and subtle invasive coronary angiography findings of erosive plaque or dissection are found retrospectively. In this setting, LGE unequivocally identifies the downstream myocardial damage as ischemic vs. inflammatory (i.e. subendocardial vs. epicardial injury) [203] making CMR central per recent guidelines from a broad international writing group in the very definition of MI [204].

Dastidar and colleagues added significant evidence supporting CMR’s utility in both diagnosis and prognostic assessment in patients with myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries (MINOCA) [205]. CMR—including cine, T2, and LGE imaging—was performed in 388 patients approximately 1 month after emergent or urgent invasive coronary angiography and showed nonobstructive CAD in the face of evident myocardial damage by elevation in blood troponin-T levels. The diagnosis of MINOCA was further refined by CMR as myocarditis in 25%, myocardial infarction in 25%, and cardiomyopathy in 25%. With 5.7% of patients suffering mortality after an average of 3.5 years, CMR diagnosis of cardiomyopathy combined with ECG presence of ST elevation were the only significant predictors of mortality in multivariable regression analysis. Importantly, such a diagnosis would be missed by modalities without CMR’s ability to identify myocardial disease, and consideration of appropriate treatment to improve outcomes in cardiomyopathy could be neglected. Such findings underscore the essential role of CMR in MINOCA.

Coronary anomalies

A contemporary understanding of coronary artery development sheds light on the range of anomalies that may result including anomalous connection, intrinsic abnormality such as non-atherosclerotic ectasia or ostial atresia, and anomalous myocardial/coronary artery interaction [206]. While infrequently detected in adults undergoing invasive coronary angiography, coronary anomalies contribute to sudden death in young individuals, especially athletes, and may also occur in conjunction with other congenital abnormalities. The volumetric nature of CMR makes it ideal in visualizing the proximal course that may not be apparent by two-dimensional projection X-ray angiography. CMRA easily identifies inter-arterial (traveling between the ascending aorta and pulmonary artery) vs. retroaortic coronary anomalies, with greater concern regarding sudden death risk in the former [57]. While other modalities such as coronary CTA offer more reliable imaging of the mid and distal segments of the coronary artery tree, such distinction of the proximal anatomy is well within reach of CMR without requiring ionizing radiation. Navigator-triggered noncontrast coronary CMRA further removes the requirement for exogenous iodinated contrast to image the proximal course of the coronary arteries [207].

Ongoing and future clinical trials will hopefully illuminate novel CAD treatment approaches informed by CMR, particularly with mechanistically relevant endpoints to test efficacy.

Kawasaki Disease

Kawasaki Disease is the prototypical systemic vasculitis that affects the coronary arteries. A disease with pediatric predilection, Kawasaki Disease typically presents with persistent fever and rash. Its potential for inflammation and aneurysm formation of the coronary arteries and ensuing myocardial damage typically mandates cardiovascular assessment, both acutely as well as in convalescence. CMR is ideal for comprehensive coronary and myocardial assessment in patients with Kawasaki Disease. Mavrogeni and colleagues offer a cogent summary of recommended CMR-based assessment during acute and chronic phases of the disease well-suited for techniques like coronary CMRA, functional assessment, perfusion with or without stress, and LGE imaging [208]. A recent quantitative CMR study, including circumferential strain measurements, showed changes like fibrotic myocardial remodeling beyond infarcted tissue in 19, mostly male, children with Kawasaki Disease [209].

These findings in a relatively rare disease are urgently relevant as the world struggles to respond to a Kawasaki Disease-like disease in children linked to the COVID-19 pandemic caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronary virus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) [210]. Systematic CMR studies are needed in children and convalescent adults to understand the long-term sequelae related to this increasingly recognized complication of COVID-19.

Myocarditis and other cardiomyopathies

The cardiomyopathies are commonly understood as primary myocardial diseases, that are not caused by CAD, hypertension, valvular or CHD [211]. Importantly, cardiomyopathies are often characterized by tissue abnormalities that reflect chronic injury, infiltration, or abnormal storage of molecules [211]. These pathologies lead to signal intensity changes in CMR images before or after contrast agent injection. Their signal behaviours and regional distribution patterns often represent important complementary diagnostic information [212]. Yet, often the findings obtained by CMR alone is sufficient for establishing a diagnosis. Over the recent years, CMR has been increasingly accepted as a critically important tool in cardiovascular disease management [213] (Table 4).

Table 4 Indications for CMR of cardiomyopathies

CMR is widely accepted as the non-invasive gold standard for quantifying biventricular volumes, myocardial mass as well as regional/global systolic function [214]. LV function can be assessed using simplified CMR approaches such as biplanar long axis views [215] or rotational long axis views [216], yet typically short axis stacks of both ventricles are applied [217, 218]. There is consensus about the methods of the quantitative assessment of the heart in CMR images [219]. Normal values have been published for the LV [218, 220] and RV [221].

CMR is the most appropriate non-invasive method to assess tissue characteristics in vivo. The fundamental contrast-generating principle of CMR is rooted in the close relationship between the magnetic properties of tissue and its molecular composition. These predict the results of myocardial mapping and affect the signal intensity in standard CMR images. Standard CMR techniques include contrast-enhanced T1-weighted CMR after iv administration of contrast agents, typically GBCAs. These techniques have been successfully applied to visualize necrosis, scar, infiltration, inflammation, or intraventricular thrombi, while edema-sensitive T2-weighted CMR images can help identify acute injury [222]. T2*-weighted imaging have proven useful in the detection of myocardial hemorrhage [223] and thrombi [224]. Myocardial mapping allows for directly measuring the change of magnetic properties as expressed by the magnetic relaxation times native T1, T2, T2*, and the extracellular volume (ECV) derived from post contrast T1 [225].

Dilated cardiomyopathy

Dilated cardiomyopathy (DCM) is characterized by ventricular dilatation, global systolic dysfunction and often accompanied by global myocardial fibrosis. CMR can accurately quantify volumes as well as regional and global LV function including wall thickening, and wall stress [226]. RV volumes, morphology, and function can usually be better assessed by CMR than with TTE [227]. In patients with DCM, LGE imaging can visualize regional fibrosis that allows for discriminating non-ischemic DCM from ischemic CMP by the invariably predominant subendocardial involvement [228]. An intramural layer of bright signal intensity, typically involving the basal anteroseptal segment, also known as “midwall stripe”, is found in about one quarter of patients with DCM patients and is a predictor of sudden death and ventricular arrhythmia [229]. This sign, albeit not specific for non-ischemic cardiomyopathy (CMP) may therefore be useful in the decision-making related to the implantation of implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. LGE imaging is also useful in the follow-up of patients with DCM. Myocardial mapping appears useful in patients with DCM [230], possible as an early marker [231].


CMR is regarded as the most useful non-invasive tool to assess for myocarditis [232]. It adds diagnostic value to a standard clinical follow-up [233] and its use increases the observed incidence of myocarditis [234]. However, it remains important to keep in mind that myocardial inflammation is not specific to viral myocarditis but also occurs in other acute myocardial diseases such as acute MI, acute cardiotoxicity, immune checkpoint inhibitor myocarditis or stress-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy. A recent expert consensus document provides guidance on the CMR techniques and their role in non-ischemic myocardial inflammation [235]. Although ventricular volumes, morphology and function often remain normal and thus their quantitative assessment is less important than in other non-ischemic cardiomyopathies, CMR may be useful by accurately quantifying these parameters at acute presentation and during follow-up.

The diagnostic targets of CMR include edema and an increased extracellular space caused by necrosis or scar. The recently updated Lake Louise Criteria for CMR in Non-Ischemic Myocardial Inflammation recommend to assess them using T1-based and T2-based markers that detect myocardial edema and myocardial injury [235]. Figure 7 shows an overview of the criteria.

Fig. 7

CMR criteria for non-ischemic myocardial inflammation (“Lake Louise Criteria”)

Increased signal intensity in T2-weighted imaging reflects inflammation-related myocardial edema [236, 237]. Patients with myocarditis typically show a regional or global signal intensity increase [237]. Edema may also be found in patients with DCM [238]. Irreversible myocardial injury can visualized in LGE images as areas with increased signal intensity with a non-ischemic regional distribution pattern [237, 239], with good agreement to histopathology [240]. LGE however has a limited sensitivity to detect myocarditis and is not specific to the acuity of the disease [235, 241]. The updated diagnostic criteria in suspected non-ischemic myocardial inflammation include (a) evidence for myocardial edema as shown by either an increased signal intensity in T2-weighted CMR images or an increased T2, and (b) evidence for myocardial injury as shown by either an increased myocardial T1, an increased myocardial ECV, or LGE in a non-ischemic regional distribution pattern [235]. Myocarditis is typically benign and myocardial edema disappears within weeks [241], whereas irreversible injury results in scars with persisting LGE.

Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy

The hallmarks of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) include an inadequate, mostly asymmetric increase of wall thickness and typically increased LV mass, associated with structural abnormalities, regional fibrosis, and LV outflow tract (LVOT) obstruction. All these markers can be quantitatively assessed by CMR. Myocardial wall thickness can be measured with more confidence than with TTE [242]. Of note, global LV mass may be normal, even in cases with marked regional hypertrophy [243]. Myocardial crypts have been associated with HCM [244], even in the absence of LV hypertrophy [245]. An overlap with the phenotype of LV non-compaction (LVNC) is being discussed. Abnormal global longitudinal strain is a marker for an impaired prognosis [246].

In HCM, the diagnostic workup can be significantly improved by CMR tissue characterization. Areas of marked hypertrophy often show regional fibrosis as focal areas with high signal intensity in LGE images [247, 248]. Furthermore, they occur at the insertion areas of the RV, likely due to increased mechanical stress in combination with relative coronary insufficiency in hypertrophied regions. LGE in HCM is associated with the risk for heart failure [249] and sudden cardiac death [250]. More definitive data are expected soon from the 3500 patient Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Registry (HCMR) trial [251]. Edema associated with HCM can be visualized by T2-weighted sequences, often co-localized with LV hypertrophy and irreversible injury [252].

Another diagnostic target in the clinical phenotyping of HCM is the presence and hemodynamic relevance of LVOT obstruction. This can be assessed by planimetric evaluation of the LVOT area [253], a parameter that appears to be more robust than the pressure gradient derived from 2D or 4D flow imaging [254]. In-plane flow imaging can be helpful to localise the peak LVOT velocity, but velocity quantitation can be difficult as the accuracy of flow mapping is often reduced in higher degrees of LVOT obstruction, due to the very narrow, turbulent jets with high acceleration.

CMR is suitable for monitoring functional and morphological changes after therapeutic interventions [253]. More recently, myocardial relaxation time mapping has also been applied to HCM [255] and helps improving our understanding of the interaction between morphology and function with tissue characteristics [256]. It is clinically important to distinguish pathological LV hypertrophy from athlete’s heart. This can be achieved by CMR using functional indices [257] or, as recently shown by the verification of a normal or even decreased proportional amount of extracellular space. Pathological hypertrophy is associated with an increased ECV, while athlete’s heart is not [258].

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy

Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is a cause of sudden death, especially in young people. As it is associated with morphological and functional abnormalities of the RV, CMR is a preferred tool for adding diagnostic information to other known criteria derived from family history, ECG, and biopsies [259,260,261]. While the assessment of RV free wall fat is not used anymore, morphological and functional abnormalities serve as markers [262]. The original ESC Task Force criteria from 1994 [263] have been modified in 2010 to increase sensitivity [264]. Subsequent studies however have shown that sensitivity may be even lower, possibly because microaneurysms in the absence of RV dilatation have been removed as a marker [265]. Other abnormalities observable by CMR include trabecular hypertrophy and a irregular dilatation with trabecular hypertrophy of the basal RV wall (“accordion sign”) [262].

The assessment of the RV is often complicated by large interindividual differences of the anatomy, its irregular shape and difficulties in visualizing the connected valves by standard views. As arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy is also associated with fibro-fatty or fatty degeneration of the myocardium, many studies have attempted to establish new diagnostic criteria based on tissue alone. While areas with bright signal intensity have been described in the RV or LV free walls, RV wall tissue characterization has been notoriously difficult because of the thinness of the RV wall and the resulting susceptibility to partial volume effects, that render tissue characterization techniques unreliable.

Cardiac amyloidosis

In patients with amyloidosis, cardiac involvement typically predicts their outcome. The main purpose of CMR therefore is the exclusion or confirmation of cardiac amyloid. While cine images are important to assess for the typical combination of concentric LV hypertrophy with reduced compliance and restriction, often combined with atrial dilatation and thickening of the valves and the atrial wall, the most important contribution of CMR is based on its ability to demonstrate tissue characteristics. The deposition of amyloid protein in the myocardium results in a marked increase of native myocardial T1 [266] and to a rapid and strong uptake of gadolinium with a typical rapid clearance of the blood from the contrast agent [267]. Because the increase of native T1 is extensive, amyloid can in many patients be demonstrated by myocardial mapping, without the use of a GBCA [225]. Of the mapping variables, the ECV has been shown to most closely mirror the amyloid burden and the response to treatment, probably because T1 and T2 effects vary with variable presence of inflammation in this condition.

Myocardial iron overload

Suspected myocardial iron deposition in patients undergoing repeated transfusions has become one of the most important applications of CMR, especially in geographical areas with a high incidence of thalassaemia, although this disease is now present worldwide due to immigration. As heart failure is the most frequent cause of death in patients with untreated iron overload, CMR can play a critical role in managing such patients. Because iron acts as a paramagnetic agent, its presence can be detected by its marked shortening effect on myocardial T2*. Since the introduction of this technique [268], the approach has been shown to be clinically very useful [269] and has greatly reduced cardiac mortality by ensuring early heart-tailored iron chelation treatment is started in patients who have been shown to be at high risk (those with T2* < 10 ms) [270]. CMR is directed toward the detection of myocardial iron deposits [271]. The T2* CMR technique has been validated in randomised controlled trials and is calibrated against human myocardium [272]. Recently, native T1 has been proposed as a marker of cardiac iron [273], but remains controversial because of lack of validation against outcomes and human tissue [274].

Left-ventricular noncompaction

Left-ventricular noncompaction (LVNC) cardiomyopathy is characterized by LV dilatation, hypokinesis, and an abnormally high proportion of trabecular, non-compacted myocardium in combination with a thin compact wall. Initially described by TTE [275], the disease is associated with sudden cardiac death, yet is insufficiently understood [276, 277]. A genetic and phenotypic overlap with HCM is likely [278]. Generally, a wall thickness ratio of noncompacted over compacted wall of 2.3 or higher was proposed to verify LVNC [279], yet the specificity of non-compacted LV myocardium for this disease has been questioned [280, 281]. More recently, a cutoff of 3 was proposed [282]. Other studies proposed a cutoff of 20% of trabecular proportion of the entire LV myocardial mass [283] or a 35% proportion of non-compacted volume of 35% of the LV volume [284]. LGE was not found to be a strong diagnostic marker [285] although a recent meta-analysis found that patients with LVNC but without LGE have a better prognosis than those with LGE. When LGE is negative and global systolic function is preserved, no hard cardiac events are to be expected [286]. While a clearly abnormal amount of trabeculation in combination with a thin, hypocontractile wall allows for establishing the diagnosis, care should be taken not to overcall LVNC [287].

Anderson-Fabry disease

Anderson-Fabry disease is caused by an enzyme defect leading to the accumulation of sphingolipids. Because the morphological appearance in myocardial involvement is indistinguishable from other forms of symmetric hypertrophy, the ability of CMR to identify sphingolipid storage in the myocardium has become a key diagnostic tool [288, 289]. Lipids lead to a decrease of native T1 and thus, concentric LV hypertrophy with a globally reduced T1 allows for the diagnosis of Anderson-Fabry Disease [225, 290]. LGE images can demonstrate layers of LGE, typically in the lateral wall [291]. Recently, evidence was provided that Anderson-Fabry Disease can present with edematous inflammation that can be demonstrated by increased T2 values [292]. Figure 8 shows a case of Anderson-Fabry disease with basal lateral LGE, a decreased T1 and an increased T2.

Fig. 8

CMR in a patient with Anderson-Fabry Disease and associated myocardial inflammation. Upper row: LGE images showing inferolateral subepicardial LGE (arrowheads). Middle row: Native T1 maps showing a global decrease of native T1, specifically in the inferolateral wall (arrows). Lower row: T2 maps with increased myocardial T2, including the inferolateral wall, co-located with the areas that showed a low T1 (arrows)

Cardiac sarcoidosis

In patients with pulmonary or extracardiac sarcoidosis, CMR should be used to verify or exclude myocardial infiltration and associated inflammation [293,294,295] as cardiac involvement is a frequent cause of death in this population [296]. Next to LV dilatation and often global systolic dysfunction, the patterns of the regional distribution of myocardial lesions varies substantially, even in the same individual and may be intramural, transmural, subendocardial or subepicardial (Fig. 9) [254, 297, 298]. Edema is often present and identifiable on T2-weighted images [254, 299].

Fig. 9

LGE images in a patient with pulmonary sarcoidosis and extensive cardiac involvement. There are several focal non-subendocardial based LGE areas with infiltration (arrows) in a variable pattern of transmural distribution

Stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy

Stress-induced cardiomyopathy, also known as Takotsubo cardiomyopathy, is characterized by a reversible, extensive systolic wall motion abnormality, typically primarily involving the mid and apical LV [300, 301]. As with other imaging techniques, CMR can visualize systolic “ballooning” of the LV. On a tissue level, the hallmark of stress-induced cardiomyopathy however is transmural extensive edema [302]. LGE is rarely observed. Results of an international multi-center trial indicate that the CMR findings are consistent with acute inflammation (likely induced by catecholamines) and that the combination of the typical wall motion abnormality with extensive edema in the absence of LGE may allow for establishing the diagnosis [303, 304].

Endomyocardial fibrosis

Endomyocardial fibrosis leads to a mainly apical concentric wall thickening, caused by extensive subendocardial fibrosis, frequently associated with an apical intraventricular thrombus. CMR is used to assess for ventricular volumes (typically small), and systolic dysfunction. As a more specific finding, endomyocardial fibrosis can be verified by LGE images [305, 306]. This pattern has also been described in patients with Churg-Strauss Syndrome [307].

Restrictive cardiomyopathy

In patients with suspected myocardial restriction, CMR assessment helps in verifying the diagnosis by demonstrating small ventricles in combination with enlarged atria [308,309,310,311]. Furthermore, CMR allows for exclusion of constrictive pericarditis by demonstration absence of pericardial thickening [312] or by the absence of septal flattening during deep inspiration (real-time cine CMR sequences) [313]. Data however are scarce as this is a relatively rare entity.

Pericardial disease

The pericardium—a virtual, sub-atmospheric space under normal circumstances—can be the location and cause of significant cardiac morbidity and mortality. Standard cardiac imaging modalities such as TTE, not infrequently fail to adequately investigate this part of the heart. Other imaging techniques such as CT provide an excellent morphologic view on the pericardium but are limited to depict the hemodynamic impact on pericardial disease on the heart. CMR has evolved to one of the preferred modalities for pericardial imaging [314, 315]. Using a series of CMR sequences, a combined morphologic-functional view on the heart and pericardium is achieved, providing adequate information with regard to the condition of pericardium, hemodynamic consequences on the heart and the presence of concomitant or superimposed myocardial/valvular disease [315] (Table 5). Morphologic sequences (e.g. spin-echo based sequences) allow detailed description of pericardial anatomy and its relation with the heart and surrounding anatomic structures. Pericardial tissue characterization—pericardial edema/inflammation/fibrosis—is achieved using a combination of non-contrast and CE sequences. It should be mentioned that for identification of pericardial calcium, CT is the best imaging modality [316]. bSSFP cine CMR allows to evaluate hemodynamic consequences, i.e. cardiac tamponade and constriction. In particular real-time bSSFP cine CMR during free breathing is able to depict pathologic ventricular coupling in patients with constrictive pericarditis [317]. Finally, phase-encoded cine CMR is of interest to study the cardiac inflow patterns, and thus to obtain information with regard to diastolic function [318].

Table 5 Indications for CMR in pericardial disease

Pericardial effusions

Together with CT, CMR is likely the preferred modality to diagnose and to differentiate pericardial effusion. As CMR is not limited as echocardiography by the need of an adequate acoustic window, the entire pericardium can be satisfactorily investigated allowing to depict small or loculated effusions or to describe complex configurations [314, 315]. Typically, pericardial effusion yields high signal intensity at bSSFP cine CMR, allowing to depict for example fibrinous strands [315]. Although TTE is the first-line imaging modality in patients with cardiac tamponade, right atrial/ventricular collapse can be shown at bSSFP cine CMR as well, for example in patients with chronic pericardial effusions. As pericardial effusion frequently occurs in the setting of inflammatory pericarditis, and rarely in constrictive pericarditis (‘effusive–constrictive’ forms), CMR is highly useful to differentiate simple effusions from pericarditis-related effusions.

Pericardial inflammation

Inflammatory pericarditis can be isolated or part of systemic disease. TTE diagnosis relies on the depiction of pericardial effusion. However, many patients have no (the so-called “dry pericarditis”) or only physiologic amounts of pericardial effusion [319]. As pericarditis is histologically characterized by thickening, edema, increased vascularity, and inflammation of the pericardial layers, the alterations can be used to depict pericardial inflammation at CMR [320]. Edema of the pericardial layers yields high-signal at T2-weighted spin-echo sequences. Also, at LGE CMR imaging, pericardial inflammation is characterized by strong pericardial enhancement [321]. In cases of effusive-inflammatory pericarditis, LGE CMR imaging allows to differentiate the inflammatory component (‘bright’) from the effusive component (‘dark’). CMR allows as well to depict associated inflammatory myocarditis. In patients with recent MI, CMR is well suited to depict epistenocardiac pericarditis [322].

Pericardial constriction

Patients with pericardial inflammation, even relapsing forms, rarely evolve towards an end-stage constrictive pericarditis [314, 315]. Histologically, the constrictive pericardium consists of collagen-rich fibrous pericardium often with several foci of calcifications. This non-compliant pericardium constricts the heart and may cause diastolic heart failure [323]. Imaging involves description of the pericardium, and on the consequences of the constriction on cardiac morphology and function [314, 315]. Although traditionally regarded as a thick pericardium, thickness as such has a limited role in defining constrictive pericardium. It has been shown that evolution from an inflammatory towards a constrictive pericardium causes a thinning of the abnormally thickened pericardium, likely explaining why at histology a substantial number of patients with constrictive pericarditis presents with mild pericardial thickening (Figs. 10, 11) [324,325,326]. End-stage constrictive pericardium typically presents with low-signal intensity at T1-weighed spin-echo CMR often with irregular borders. In contrast to pericardial inflammation, T2-weighted spin-echo CMR shows lack of pericardial edema and LGE CMR shows no or limited contrast enhancement [321]. In patients with clinically suspected constrictive pericarditis, the degree of enhancement can be used to predict reversibility and to determine patients who still may benefit of anti-inflammatory treatment [324, 325]. As the pericardium at the atrioventricular sulcus and right side of the heart are most frequently and extensively affected, external compression of the heart at these places is most common. As a consequence, the right atrium and inferior vena cava are dilated, and patients often present pleural effusion [314]. As the morphologic features in constrictive pericarditis may be not impressive, assessment of the hemodynamic consequences is crucial, which can be achieved looking at the ventricular coupling. Constrictive pericarditis patients show pronounced inspiratory flattening and/or inversion of the ventricular septum, while during expiration the opposite phenomenon occurs with increased right-sided septal motion. A simple and elegant way to evaluate ventricular coupling is the use of real-time free breathing bSSFP cine CMR while asking the patient to deep breathe in and out [317]. Also, phase-contrast cine CMR with real-time imaging can be used showing abnormal variation of inflow velocities [318]. Line tagging, with the tag lines perpendicularly positioned on the pericardium may be of interest to assess fibrotic adhesion of the pericardial layers as well as to judge pericardial motion with respect to the underlying myocardial deformation across the cardiac cycle. In patients with constrictive pericarditis, the calcifications are not necessarily confined to the pericardium but may extent into the underlying myocardium, affecting regional and if pronounced also global systolic function [316].

Fig. 10

62-year-old woman with clinical presentation of Dressler’s syndrome following mitral and tricuspid valve replacement. Axial T1-weighted FSE imaging shows mildly thickening pericardium (a, black arrows). Short-axis T2-weighted fast spin echo imaging shows diffuse hyperintense appearance of the pericardium (b, white arrows). Late gadolinium enhancement imaging in cardiac short-axis shows diffuse strong pericardial enhancement (c, white arrows). CMR findings are highly suggestive of inflammatory pericarditis without evidence of associated pericardial effusion (“dry pericarditis”)

Fig. 11

This 72-year-old male was admitted with dyspnea, pleural fluid and cirrhosis. Horizontal long-axis T1-weighted fast spin echo imaging shows (a) shows a focally thickened pericardium (black arrow) focally constricting the apical half of the right ventricle (RV). Horizontal long-axis cine imaging (b) confirms the constriction of the RV apex by the thick pericardium (white arrow). Presence of a moderate tricuspid regurgitation, bilaterally dilated atria, and right-sided pleural effusion, indirect findings compatible with constrictive pericarditis. The patient underwent successfully a pericardectomy

Congenital abnormalities of the pericardium

Pericardial cyst is the most common pericardial congenital abnormality and is usually an incidental finding in asymptomatic patients [314, 315]. As the location and presentation are typical, the diagnosis is usually straightforward. Pericardial cysts are typically paracardiac in location and present low signal intensity at T1-weighted but high signal at T2-weighted images with well-defined borders. CMR is helpful to differentiate this entity with other cystic structures arising in the chest (bronchogenic, esophageal duplication, thymic). Congenital absence of the pericardium is an extremely rare entity. Protrusion of a portion of the heart through the defect—usually left-sided—causes an abnormal left to posterior location of heart. This observation—in the lack of other explanations for the abnormal positioning—should rise the possibility of a congenital defect [314, 315]. Defining the defect as such is more difficult as the pericardium along the LV is often not well visible due to the lack of surrounding fat. Repositioning the patient in right lateral decubitus may be very helpful to show the dynamic nature of this disease with (near-)normalization of the cardiac configuration/position [327].

Cardiac masses

Primary tumours of the heart and pericardium, with the exception of atrial myxomas, occur rarely; metastatic tumors to or directly invasive of the heart are far more common [328, 329]. In adults the majority of primary tumors are benign with atrial myxomas being the most common. Other benign tumors include rhabdomyomas, fibromas, papillary fibroelastomas, hemangiomas, lipomas, hamartomas, teratomas and pericardial cysts [328, 329]. The malignant tumors consist of various sarcomas: myxosarcoma, liposarcoma, angiosarcoma, fibrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, osteosarcoma, synovial sarcoma, rhabdomyosarcoma, undifferentiated sarcoma, lymphoma, neurofibrosarcoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma [328, 329]. Benign tumours in infants and children are mainly teratoma, myxoma, fibroma and rhabdomyoma while malignant tumours include rhabdomyosarcoma, germ cell tumour and fibrosarcoma [330, 331].

Cardiac tumors produce a wide spectrum of symptoms through a number of mechanisms. Their size can obstruct intracardiac blood flow or interfere with valve function. Local invasion can lead to arrhythmias or pericardial effusions with tamponade. Fragments of tumor can embolize, causing systemic deficits when the tumors are on the left side of the heart and pulmonary infarcts on the right side. Finally, the tumors may cause systemic or constitutional symptoms. Some tumors, produce no symptoms and become evident as incidental findings.

While TTE remains the first line imaging modality used in patients suspected of an intracardiac tumour or mass, this technique has several limitations and is highly dependent upon availability of good TTE “window” and even then, may not be able to provide a comprehensive answer due to limited field of view and inability to characterize tissue. Positron emission tomography (PET) can also be used to characterize cardiac masses, but it has limited availability and limited spatial resolution and only in combination with the anatomic information of CT has it become a valuable tool for a variety of oncologic indications [332]. CMR has evolved as a reference standard method for the assessment of suspected cardiac tumours and is being increasingly used for confirmation and localization, assessment of size, shape, attachment point and relation to surrounding structures as well as the haemodynamic impact and tissue characterization of cardiac masses that may have been discovered using other types of imaging (Table 6). It is a versatile imaging method that provides 2D or 3D imaging using a variety of pulse sequences for a comprehensive assessment of cardiac tumours and related cardiovascular complications and is helpful in determining prognosis and treatment planning intervention (Figs. 12, 13) [333,334,335]. Serial CMR studies can be used to evaluate tumour growth, as well as assessment of resection and to monitor recurrence after surgery and to assess regression or progression after chemotherapy or radiotherapy [336, 337]. In addition to this, several CMR features can assist in tumour characterization [333, 334]. The signal intensity of a lesion is dependent on the interaction of the tissue composition and the CMR parameters employed for imaging. The differential diagnosis of a high signal intensity lesion on T1-weighted images, corresponding to a short T1 relaxation time value, includes fatty tumours (lipoma, liposarcoma), recent haemorrhage (due to methaemoglobin breakdown products) and melanoma (due to the effects of melanin). A lesion with low signal intensity on T1-weighted images may represent a cyst filled with low protein fluid, a signal void in a vascular malformation, a calcified lesion or the presence of air. Cysts typically have high signal intensity on T2-weighted images, corresponding to a long T2 relaxation time value, independent of the protein concentration of the fluid. Tumours with high vascularity such as haemangioma also have high signal intensity on T2 weighted images while fibroma exhibits low signal intensity on this sequence. Fat saturation suppress fat signal and can be used to diagnose fatty content definitively or better using fat/water separated images [338].

Table 6 Indications for CMR of cardiac masses
Fig. 12

Left atrial sarcoma (undifferentiated) obstructing mitral inflow (upper left: diastolic frame from bSSFP cine). T1W turbo spin-echo image shows the mass isointense relative to the myocardium (upper right) and hyperintense on short tau inversion recovery (STIR) T2 image (lower left). Extensive patchy enhancement within the mass is seen on LGE compatible with necrosis in this setting (lower right)

Fig. 13

Large right ventricular fibroma attached to the entire ventricular septum. Diastolic frame from bSSFP cine (upper left). T1W fast spin-echo image (upper right) and STIR T2 image (lower right) show hypointense mass with very well defined borders and a thin rim of myocardium. LGE (right lower) shows extensive almost homogenous enhancement of the mass due to high fibrous/collagen content

Further differentiation of the tumour can be made with GBCA which can be used in various ways [333,334,335,336,337]. During the first pass of GBCA, vascular tumours show early enhancement and small vessels may be easily identifiable. The first pass enhancement is particularly avid in haemangioma and to a lesser extent in angiosarcoma particularly if there is extensive necrosis and destruction of capillary bed. In the early phase, after injection at 1–2 min, necrotic areas in malignant tumours show as dark areas surrounded by enhancement elsewhere. In the later phase (typically 10 min after injection), benign tumours such fibroma and haemangioma characteristically show strong almost homogenous enhancement while malignant tumours typically show heterogenous contrast enhancement indicating vascularity or GBCA leak age into a necrotic or fibrotic compartment. Such enhancement is usually absent in cystic lesions. Thrombus in the ventricles is well shown by modern CMR sequences, including bSSFP cines, and LGE [339] and for this CMR application may be more sensitive than echocardiography even with echocardiographic contrast [340,341,342]. CE-CMRA provides additional information about primary or secondary vascular involvement. Intracardiac tumour mobility and its attachment points are best assessed by cine bSSFP while phase-contrast flow mapping is very useful for evaluation of the haemodynamic impact of cardiac tumours. More recently native T1 and T2 mapping have been used as adjunct techniques for tissue characterization of cardiac tumours and masses [343]. Further development of PET/CMR scanners enabling combined high-sensitivity molecular imaging with high soft-tissue contrast and spectroscopic information, may have an important impact on the localization and differentiation of tumors [344].

Finally, it is important to recognize the difference between structures normally present in the heart, which may be mistaken as a cardiac mass, and true cardiac masses. Structures that are normally present in the heart but are sometimes misinterpreted as pathology are [333]:

  1. 1

    Crista terminalis, seen as a muscular ridge at the entry site of the superior vena cava into the right atrium, demarcating the part of the right atrium that is embryologically derived from the sinus venosus.

  2. 2

    Eustachian valve, variably present in the right atrium as a remnant structure, after conveying blood toward the foramen ovale during fetal life.

  3. 3

    “Coumadin ridge” at the confluence of the left upper pulmonary vein and the left atrial appendage which can sometimes be bulbous. This is easily recognized by CMR but it can sometimes be misinterpreted as a thrombus or mass particularly with TTE .

  4. 4

    Chiari network in the right atrium.

  5. 5

    The moderator band of the RV that uniquely identifies the anatomical RV;

  6. 6

    False tendons of the LV.

Valvular heart disease

CMR has unique capabilities which can greatly enhance the assessment of valvular heart disease. TTE will likely remain the first-line and most common imaging modality for assessing valve disease, and AHA/ACC and ESC guidelines recommend CMR when echocardiographic assessment is unable to provide sufficient information. However, there are many areas where CMR provides ‘added value’ to echocardiographic assessment in valve disease and can be complementary. Further, CMR can provide a comprehensive ‘stand-alone’ assessment in several situations, delivering optimal assessment of patients using a combination of techniques, and for some valve lesions it is the most accurate method of assessment (Table 7).

Table 7 Indications for CMR in valvular heart disease

Cine CMR with bSSFP sequences provides high resolution imaging of valve anatomy and function, particularly utilising the high contrast between the valve leaflets and the blood pool (Fig. 14). Care is required to position the imaging plane perpendicular to the valve leaflets to minimise partial volume effects, but this is readily achieved. Excellent visualisation of the inflow and outflow tracts for both ventricles provide a full assessment of the location and nature of any obstruction. Additional information on the great vessels (aorta and pulmonary trunk) provides important information on the aetiology of aortic and pulmonary valve disease and the surrounding anatomy, to inform clinical management. CMR is especially helpful for areas that can be difficult to view with echocardiography, such as the pulmonary valve/trunk or the ascending aorta and is also feasible in larger patients without compromising image quality or visualisation of the relevant area.

Fig. 14

Moderate aortic stenosis (short axis cine bSSFP image through the aortic valve tips in systole)—demonstrating the ease and reliability of direct planimetry to measure the valve area

Phase contrast velocity mapping delivers trans-valvar velocity, similarly to echo, with the advantage of not relying on alignment of the flow jet with the Doppler beam from the external chest wall (Fig. 15). However, the major advantage over all other imaging techniques, and a unique feature of CMR, is the ability of this sequence to quantify flow. This facilitates true quantitation of regurgitant valve lesions, rather than qualitative grading based on arbitrary thresholds.

Fig. 15

4D flow image demonstrating the extreme helical flow pattern in the ascending aorta of a patient with a bicuspid aortic valve

Finally, accurate and reproducible quantification of LV and RV volumes, mass and function using CMR allows assessment of the effect of the valve lesion(s) on each ventricle and can be monitored over time.


Mild regurgitation is usually well assessed with echocardiography and in general does not require CMR assessment. The greatest utility of CMR lies in distinguishing moderate and severe regurgitation—this can be difficult with echocardiography, especially for aortic regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation with eccentric jets, and also where valve anatomy is non-standard (eg bicuspid valves, cleft mitral valves). Where discrepancy or uncertainty about the degree of regurgitation exists, CMR can usually provide a quantitative answer. Aortic regurgitation and pulmonary regurgitation are straightforward to assess with CMR, using phase contrast velocity mapping in a slice located just distal to the valve, and the regurgitant volume and regurgitant fraction (regurgitant volume/forward volume) can be quantified. It is important to use a reliable correction method for the background flow offset error that can occur, such as the interpolated background flow correction technique. Quantifying mitral regurgitation or tricuspid regurgitation is generally performed using an indirect approach, subtracting aortic flow or pulmonary flow (obtained from flow mapping) from LV or RV stroke volumes, respectively (using whole-heart volumetric cine assessment) [345]. This technique has the advantage of not being affected by regurgitant jets that are multiple, eccentric and/or variable through systole. Newer sequences with valve tracking software and/or 4D flow can be used for direct regurgitation quantification, but these are less well established and available, and their reliability has not been comprehensively assessed.

Quantifying aortic regurgitation with CMR has been shown to predict the future development of symptoms [346], and performed significantly better than TTE. Similar predictive ability has been demonstrated for the quantification of mitral regurgitation with CMR [347, 348], and echocardiography was shown to have a consistent tendency towards over-estimation of the degree of mitral regurgitation [347, 349]. Mitral regurgitation quantification was also strongly associated with LV remodeling after valve repair/replacement [349]. Visualisation of the mitral valve with bSSFP cine imaging provides a similar level of information on anatomy and function as TEE [350], and also provides good assessment of the mitral regurgitant orifice in functional mitral regurgitation [351]. Pulmonary regurgitation is straightforward to quantify and combined with good visualization of the RV outflow tract, CMR is the optimal technique for this lesion (for example in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot). In future, evolving techniques such as 4D flow imaging may facilitate accurate direct flow assessment in regurgitant lesions.


CMR can assess any valve stenosis, although is most commonly used for aortic stenosis and pulmonary stenosis. This is best achieved with a bSSFP cine imaging slice at the valve tips in systole (or diastole for mitral or tricuspid stenosis), which provides clear visualization of the degree of stenosis, and the valve area can be accurately measured from this [352], even with angulated outflow tracts. Although the anatomical valve area is often slightly larger than the valve area assessed by echocardiographic continuity equation, it remains a valuable technique. Velocity mapping adds to this with an assessment of the haemodynamic severity of the stenosis. At higher velocities (> 3-4 m/s), accuracy is reduced due to signal loss from turbulence and phase shift errors from intra-voxel acceleration and dephasing, although ultra-short echo-time velocity mapping sequences may improve accuracy in high velocity jets [353], where these are available. Pulmonary stenosis can be difficult to assess with echocardiography in adults, due to limited acoustic windows and the parallel direction of the RV outflow tract with the sternum, but this is easily assessed with CMR which is the optimal method for assessing pulmonary stenosis. Sub- and supra-valvar aortic and pulmonary stenosis (e.g. sub-aortic membranes) can also be seen easily with CMR bSSFP cine imaging. The presence of myocardial fibrosis on LGE in aortic stenosis has been associated with future events [354] but the clinical utility of this finding requires further study.

Prosthetic valves

Virtually all prosthetic valves and rings are safe in both 1.5 T and 3 T CMR scanners, and CMR assessment can be valuable where not adequately assessed by echocardiography. Most valves create a signal void artefact, although the degree is variable and depends on the type and amount of metal in the valve or frame. bSSFP or gradient echo cine imaging can visualize prosthetic leaflet opening in selected bioprosthetic valves, as well as demonstrate valve rocking, paravalvar leaks, abscesses and aneurysms where present. Flow quantification beyond the artefact from the valve can quantify forward velocity (for assessment of stenosis) and forward/reverse flow for regurgitation quantification, including the location of the leak. In selected cases, focused regions of interest for flow mapping can quantify the individual components of regurgitation (eg valvar vs paravalvar or each paravalvar leak if > 1 are present) to aid clinical treatment decisions.


CMR is one of the most powerful diagnostic tools in modern medicine and can provide highly reliable and actionable information for diagnosis and treatment across the spectrum of cardiovascular diseases. The high pace of technical advancements has led to a continuous expansion of the diagnostic capabilities and indications for CMR. In this Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance Consensus Panel report we provide a contemporary review of indications for CMR. The SCMR intends to update this document frequently with information about new CMR techniques and results of studies and trials that lead to new or altered indications for clinical CMR.

Availability of data and materials

Not applicable.



Arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy


American College of Cardiology Foundation


Acute coronary syndrome


American Heart Association


Angioplasty and Stenting for Renal Artery Lesions trial


Balanced steady state free precession


Coronary artery disease




Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease


Congenital heart disease


Chronic kidney disease




Cardiovascular magnetic resonance


Cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography


Cardiovascular Outcomes in Renal Atherosclerotic Lesions trial


Coronavirus disease 19


Computed tomography


Computed tomography angiography


Dilated cardiomyopathy




Extracellular volume fraction


Ejection fraction


European Society of Cardiology


Field of view


Gadolinium based contrast agents


Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy


Intramural hematoma


International Study of Comparative Health Effectiveness with Medical and Invasive Approaches trial


Late gadolinium enhancement


Left ventricle/left ventricular


Left ventricular ejection fraction


Left ventricular noncompaction


Left ventricular outflow tract


Myocardial infarction


Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary arteries


Maximum intensity projection


Microvascular obstruction


Multiplanar reformation


Magnetic resonance angiography


Magnetic resonance imaging


MR Perfusion Imaging to Guide Management of Patients With Stable Coronary Artery Disease


Non-ST elevation myocardial infarction


Positron emission tomography


Prospective investigation of pulmonary embolism diagnosis


Percutaneous coronary intervention


Pulse wave velocity


Quiescent interval single shot

Qp:Qs ratio:

Pulmonary to systemic flow ratio


Randomized clinical trial


Right ventricle/right ventricular


Severe acute respiratory syndrome corona virus 2


Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance


ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction


Echo time


Transesophageal echocardiography


Thoracic endovascular aortic repair


Transposition of the great arteries


Inversion time


Repetition time


Turbo spin echo


Transthoracic echocardiography


Ulcer-like projection


Velocity encoding


Volume rendering


  1. 1.

    Pennell DJ, Sechtem UP, Higgins CB, et al. Clinical indications for cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR): consensus panel report. Eur Heart J. 2004;25(21):1940–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Babu-Narayan SV, Goktekin O, Moon JC, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the systemic right ventricle in adults with previous atrial redirection surgery for transposition of the great arteries. Circulation. 2005;111(16):2091–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    Babu-Narayan SV, Kilner PJ, Li W, et al. Ventricular fibrosis suggested by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with repaired tetralogy of fallot and its relationship to adverse markers of clinical outcome. Circulation. 2006;113(3):405–13.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    Dusenbery SM, Jerosch-Herold M, Rickers C, et al. Myocardial extracellular remodeling is associated with ventricular diastolic dysfunction in children and young adults with congenital aortic stenosis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(17):1778–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Rathod RH, Prakash A, Powell AJ, Geva T. Myocardial fibrosis identified by cardiac magnetic resonance late gadolinium enhancement is associated with adverse ventricular mechanics and ventricular tachycardia late after Fontan operation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(16):1721–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Wald RM, Haber I, Wald R, Valente AM, Powell AJ, Geva T. Effects of regional dysfunction and late gadolinium enhancement on global right ventricular function and exercise capacity in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Circulation. 2009;119(10):1370–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Brown DW, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus routine cardiac catheterization before bidirectional glenn anastomosis in infants with functional single ventricle: a prospective randomized trial. Circulation. 2007;116(23):2718–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Geva T, Greil GF, Marshall AC, Landzberg M, Powell AJ. Gadolinium-enhanced 3-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary blood supply in patients with complex pulmonary stenosis or atresia: comparison with x-ray angiography. Circulation. 2002;106(4):473–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Baumgartner H, Bonhoeffer P, De Groot NM, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of grown-up congenital heart disease (new version 2010). Eur Heart J. 2010;31(23):2915–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Kilner PJ, Geva T, Kaemmerer H, Trindade PT, Schwitter J, Webb GD. Recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adults with congenital heart disease from the respective working groups of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(7):794–805.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Stout KK, Daniels CJ, Aboulhosn JA, et al. 2018 AHA/ACC guideline for the management of adults with congenital heart disease: executive summary: a report of the american college of cardiology/american heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;139:14.

    Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Buechel EV, Kaiser T, Jackson C, Schmitz A, Kellenberger CJ. Normal right- and left ventricular volumes and myocardial mass in children measured by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2009;11:19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Robbers-Visser D, Boersma E, Helbing WA. Normal biventricular function, volumes, and mass in children aged 8 to 17 years. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(3):552–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Sarikouch S, Peters B, Gutberlet M, et al. Sex-specific pediatric percentiles for ventricular size and mass as reference values for cardiac MRI: assessment by steady-state free-precession and phase-contrast MRI flow. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010;3(1):65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Blalock SE, Banka P, Geva T, Powell AJ, Zhou J, Prakash A. Interstudy variability in cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of ventricular volume, mass, and ejection fraction in repaired tetralogy of Fallot: a prospective observational study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;38(4):829–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Mooij CF, de Wit CJ, Graham DA, Powell AJ, Geva T. Reproducibility of MRI measurements of right ventricular size and function in patients with normal and dilated ventricles. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(1):67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Sheehan FH, Kilner PJ, Sahn DJ, et al. Accuracy of knowledge-based reconstruction for measurement of right ventricular volume and function in patients with tetralogy of Fallot. Am J Cardiol. 2010;105(7):993–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Winter MM, Bernink FJ, Groenink M, et al. Evaluating the systemic right ventricle by CMR: the importance of consistent and reproducible delineation of the cavity. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10:40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Barth P, Esdorn H, Gieseke J, Meyer H. Noninvasive quantification of left-to-right shunt in pediatric patients: phase-contrast cine magnetic resonance imaging compared with invasive oximetry. Circulation. 2001;103(20):2476–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Hundley WG, Li HF, Lange RA, et al. Assessment of left-to-right intracardiac shunting by velocity-encoded, phase-difference magnetic resonance imaging. A comparison with oximetric and indicator dilution techniques. Circulation. 1995;91(12):2955–60.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Muthurangu V, Taylor A, Andriantsimiavona R, et al. Novel method of quantifying pulmonary vascular resistance by use of simultaneous invasive pressure monitoring and phase-contrast magnetic resonance flow. Circulation. 2004;110(7):826–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Prompona M, Muehling O, Naebauer M, Schoenberg SO, Reiser M, Huber A. MRI for detection of anomalous pulmonary venous drainage in patients with sinus venosus atrial septal defects. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;27(3):403–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Valente AM, Sena L, Powell AJ, Del Nido PJ, Geva T. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of sinus venosus defects: comparison to surgical findings. Pediatr Cardiol. 2007;28(1):51–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Beerbaum P, Korperich H, Esdorn H, et al. Atrial septal defects in pediatric patients: noninvasive sizing with cardiovascular MR imaging. Radiology. 2003;228(2):361–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Teo KS, Disney PJ, Dundon BK, et al. Assessment of atrial septal defects in adults comparing cardiovascular magnetic resonance with transoesophageal echocardiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2010;12:44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Thomson LE, Crowley AL, Heitner JF, et al. Direct en face imaging of secundum atrial septal defects by velocity-encoded cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients evaluated for possible transcatheter closure. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;1(1):31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Mohrs OK, Petersen SE, Erkapic D, et al. Diagnosis of patent foramen ovale using contrast-enhanced dynamic MRI: a pilot study. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005;184(1):234–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Rustemli A, Bhatti TK, Wolff SD. Evaluating cardiac sources of embolic stroke with MRI. Echocardiography. 2007;24(3):301–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Bhatla P, Tretter JT, Ludomirsky A, et al. Utility and scope of rapid prototyping in patients with complex muscular ventricular septal defects or double-outlet right ventricle: does it alter management decisions? Pediatr Cardiol. 2017;38(1):103–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Cawley PJ, Hamilton-Craig C, Owens DS, et al. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(1):48–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. 31.

    Uretsky S, Argulian E, Narula J, Wolff SD. Use of cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in assessing mitral regurgitation: current evidence. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(5):547–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. 32.

    Calkoen EE, Westenberg JJ, Kroft LJ, et al. Characterization and quantification of dynamic eccentric regurgitation of the left atrioventricular valve after atrioventricular septal defect correction with 4D Flow cardiovascular magnetic resonance and retrospective valve tracking. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. 33.

    Grosse-Wortmann L, Al-Otay A, Yoo SJ. Aortopulmonary collaterals after bidirectional cavopulmonary connection or Fontan completion: quantification with MRI. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(3):219–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. 34.

    Whitehead KK, Gillespie MJ, Harris MA, Fogel MA, Rome JJ. Noninvasive quantification of systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow: a major source of inefficiency in patients with superior cavopulmonary connections. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(5):405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. 35.

    Buchner S, Debl K, Schmid FX, Luchner A, Djavidani B. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance assessment of the aortic valve stenosis: an in vivo and ex vivo study. BMC Med Imaging. 2015;15:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. 36.

    Steeden JA, Jones A, Pandya B, Atkinson D, Taylor AM, Muthurangu V. High-resolution slice-selective Fourier velocity encoding in congenital heart disease using spiral SENSE with velocity unwrap. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(6):1538–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. 37.

    Tobler D, Yalonetsky S, Crean AM, et al. Right heart characteristics and exercise parameters in adults with Ebstein anomaly: new perspectives from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging studies. Int J Cardiol. 2013;165(1):146–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. 38.

    Yalonetsky S, Tobler D, Greutmann M, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and the assessment of ebstein anomaly in adults. Am J Cardiol. 2011;107(5):767–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. 39.

    Rydman R, Shiina Y, Diller GP, et al. Major adverse events and atrial tachycardia in Ebstein’s anomaly predicted by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart. 2018;104(1):37–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. 40.

    Beroukhim RS, Jing L, Harrild DM, et al. Impact of the cone operation on left ventricular size, function, and dyssynchrony in Ebstein anomaly: a cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. 41.

    Li X, Wang SM, Schreiber C, et al. More than valve repair: Effect of cone reconstruction on right ventricular geometry and function in patients with Ebstein anomaly. Int J Cardiol. 2016;206:131–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. 42.

    Greil GF, Powell AJ, Gildein HP, Geva T. Gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography of pulmonary and systemic venous anomalies. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;39(2):335–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. 43.

    Prakash A, Torres AJ, Printz BF, Prince MR, Nielsen JC. Usefulness of magnetic resonance angiography in the evaluation of complex congenital heart disease in newborns and infants. Am J Cardiol. 2007;100(4):715–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. 44.

    Valsangiacomo Buchel ER, DiBernardo S, Bauersfeld U, Berger F. Contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography of the great arteries in patients with congenital heart disease: an accurate tool for planning catheter-guided interventions. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2005;21(2–3):313–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. 45.

    Godart F, Labrot G, Devos P, McFadden E, Rey C, Beregi JP. Coarctation of the aorta: comparison of aortic dimensions between conventional MR imaging, 3D MR angiography, and conventional angiography. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(8):2034–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. 46.

    Cantinotti M, Hegde S, Bell A, Razavi R. Diagnostic role of magnetic resonance imaging in identifying aortic arch anomalies. Congenit Heart Dis. 2008;3(2):117–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. 47.

    Eichhorn JG, Fink C, Delorme S, Hagl S, Kauczor HU, Ulmer HE. Magnetic resonance blood flow measurements in the follow-up of pediatric patients with aortic coarctation—a re-evaluation. Int J Cardiol. 2006;113(3):291–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. 48.

    Hom JJ, Ordovas K, Reddy GP. Velocity-encoded cine MR imaging in aortic coarctation: functional assessment of hemodynamic events. Radiographics. 2008;28(2):407–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. 49.

    Julsrud PR, Breen JF, Felmlee JP, Warnes CA, Connolly HM, Schaff HV. Coarctation of the aorta: collateral flow assessment with phase-contrast MR angiography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1997;169(6):1735–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  50. 50.

    Krieger EV, Clair M, Opotowsky AR, et al. Correlation of exercise response in repaired coarctation of the aorta to left ventricular mass and geometry. Am J Cardiol. 2013;111(3):406–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. 51.

    Oshinski JN, Parks WJ, Markou CP, et al. Improved measurement of pressure gradients in aortic coarctation by magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1996;28(7):1818–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  52. 52.

    Therrien J, Thorne SA, Wright A, Kilner PJ, Somerville J. Repaired coarctation: a “cost-effective” approach to identify complications in adults. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;35(4):997–1002.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  53. 53.

    Leonardi B, Secinaro A, Cutrera R, et al. Imaging modalities in children with vascular ring and pulmonary artery sling. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2015;50(8):781–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. 54.

    Fogel MA, Pawlowski TW, Harris MA, et al. Comparison and usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance versus computed tomography in infants six months of age or younger with aortic arch anomalies without deep sedation or anesthesia. Am J Cardiol. 2011;108(1):120–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. 55.

    Beerbaum P, Sarikouch S, Laser KT, Greil G, Burchert W, Korperich H. Coronary anomalies assessed by whole-heart isotropic 3D magnetic resonance imaging for cardiac morphology in congenital heart disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;29(2):320–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. 56.

    Tangcharoen T, Bell A, Hegde S, et al. Detection of coronary artery anomalies in infants and young children with congenital heart disease by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2011;259(1):240–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. 57.

    Ripley DP, Saha A, Teis A, et al. The distribution and prognosis of anomalous coronary arteries identified by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: 15 year experience from two tertiary centres. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. 58.

    Taylor AM, Thorne SA, Rubens MB, et al. Coronary artery imaging in grown up congenital heart disease: complementary role of magnetic resonance and x-ray coronary angiography. Circulation. 2000;101(14):1670–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  59. 59.

    Roman KS, Kellenberger CJ, Farooq S, MacGowan CK, Gilday DL, Yoo SJ. Comparative imaging of differential pulmonary blood flow in patients with congenital heart disease: magnetic resonance imaging versus lung perfusion scintigraphy. Pediatr Radiol. 2005;35(3):295–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. 60.

    Sridharan S, Derrick G, Deanfield J, Taylor AM. Assessment of differential branch pulmonary blood flow: a comparative study of phase contrast magnetic resonance imaging and radionuclide lung perfusion imaging. Heart. 2006;92(7):963–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  61. 61.

    Giardini A, Khambadkone S, Taylor A, Derrick G. Effect of abnormal pulmonary flow distribution on ventilatory efficiency and exercise capacity after arterial switch operation for transposition of great arteries. Am J Cardiol. 2010;106(7):1023–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. 62.

    Rodrigues R, Goncalves S, Abecasis J, Abecasis M. A rare case of ascending aortic stenosis. Eur Heart J. 2016;37(26):2054.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. 63.

    Farooqi KM, Uppu SC, Nguyen K, et al. Application of virtual three-dimensional models for simultaneous visualization of intracardiac anatomic relationships in double outlet right ventricle. Pediatr Cardiol. 2016;37(1):90–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. 64.

    Knauth AL, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, et al. Ventricular size and function assessed by cardiac MRI predict major adverse clinical outcomes late after tetralogy of Fallot repair. Heart. 2008;94(2):211–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  65. 65.

    Orwat S, Diller GP, Kempny A, et al. Myocardial deformation parameters predict outcome in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot. Heart. 2016;102(3):209–15.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  66. 66.

    Valente AM, Gauvreau K, Assenza GE, et al. Contemporary predictors of death and sustained ventricular tachycardia in patients with repaired tetralogy of Fallot enrolled in the INDICATOR cohort. Heart. 2014;100(3):247–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. 67.

    Frigiola A, Tsang V, Bull C, et al. Biventricular response after pulmonary valve replacement for right ventricular outflow tract dysfunction: is age a predictor of outcome? Circulation. 2008;118(14 Suppl):S182-190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. 68.

    Lee C, Kim YM, Lee CH, et al. Outcomes of pulmonary valve replacement in 170 patients with chronic pulmonary regurgitation after relief of right ventricular outflow tract obstruction: implications for optimal timing of pulmonary valve replacement. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;60(11):1005–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. 69.

    Oosterhof T, van Straten A, Vliegen HW, et al. Preoperative thresholds for pulmonary valve replacement in patients with corrected tetralogy of Fallot using cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2007;116(5):545–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. 70.

    Geva T. Repaired tetralogy of Fallot: the roles of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in evaluating pathophysiology and for pulmonary valve replacement decision support. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. 71.

    Rydman R, Gatzoulis MA, Ho SY, et al. Systemic right ventricular fibrosis detected by cardiovascular magnetic resonance is associated with clinical outcome, mainly new-onset atrial arrhythmia, in patients after atrial redirection surgery for transposition of the great arteries. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8:5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  72. 72.

    Shepard CW, Germanakis I, White MT, Powell AJ, Co-Vu J, Geva T. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings late after the arterial switch operation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9:9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. 73.

    Ntsinjana HN, Tann O, Hughes M, et al. Utility of adenosine stress perfusion CMR to assess paediatric coronary artery disease. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(8):898–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. 74.

    Tobler D, Motwani M, Wald RM, et al. Evaluation of a comprehensive cardiovascular magnetic resonance protocol in young adults late after the arterial switch operation for d-transposition of the great arteries. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. 75.

    Dorfman AL, Geva T. Magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of congenital heart disease: conotruncal anomalies. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(4):645–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. 76.

    Frank L, Dillman JR, Parish V, et al. Cardiovascular MR imaging of conotruncal anomalies. Radiographics. 2010;30(4):1069–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. 77.

    Fogel MA, Hubbard A, Weinberg PM. A simplified approach for assessment of intracardiac baffles and extracardiac conduits in congenital heart surgery with two- and three-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging. Am Heart J. 2001;142(6):1028–36.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  78. 78.

    Martinez JE, Mohiaddin RH, Kilner PJ, et al. Obstruction in extracardiac ventriculopulmonary conduits: value of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging with velocity mapping and Doppler echocardiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1992;20(2):338–44.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  79. 79.

    Hong YK, Park YW, Ryu SJ, et al. Efficacy of MRI in complicated congenital heart disease with visceral heterotaxy syndrome. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2000;24(5):671–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  80. 80.

    Yim D, Nagata H, Lam CZ, et al. Disharmonious patterns of heterotaxy and isomerism: how often are the classic patterns breached? Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(2):e006917.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. 81.

    Banka P, Schaetzle B, Komarlu R, Emani S, Geva T, Powell AJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance parameters associated with early transplant-free survival in children with small left hearts following conversion from a univentricular to biventricular circulation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16:73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  82. 82.

    Grosse-Wortmann L, Yun TJ, Al-Radi O, et al. Borderline hypoplasia of the left ventricle in neonates: insights for decision-making from functional assessment with magnetic resonance imaging. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2008;136(6):1429–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. 83.

    Brown DW, Gauvreau K, Powell AJ, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance versus routine cardiac catheterization before bidirectional Glenn anastomosis: long-term follow-up of a prospective randomized trial. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2013;146(5):1172–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  84. 84.

    Krupickova S, Muthurangu V, Hughes M, et al. Echocardiographic arterial measurements in complex congenital diseases before bidirectional Glenn: comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(3):332–41.

    Google Scholar 

  85. 85.

    Muthurangu V, Taylor AM, Hegde SR, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging after stage I Norwood operation for hypoplastic left heart syndrome. Circulation. 2005;112(21):3256–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  86. 86.

    Ait-Ali L, De Marchi D, Lombardi M, et al. The role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in candidates for Fontan operation: proposal of a new algorithm. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  87. 87.

    Fogel MA. Is routine cardiac catheterization necessary in the management of patients with single ventricles across staged Fontan reconstruction? No! Pediatr Cardiol. 2005;26(2):154–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  88. 88.

    Prakash A, Khan MA, Hardy R, Torres AJ, Chen JM, Gersony WM. A new diagnostic algorithm for assessment of patients with single ventricle before a Fontan operation. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009;138(4):917–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  89. 89.

    Glatz AC, Rome JJ, Small AJ, et al. Systemic-to-pulmonary collateral flow, as measured by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, is associated with acute post-Fontan clinical outcomes. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(2):218–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  90. 90.

    Grosse-Wortmann L, Drolet C, Dragulescu A, et al. Aortopulmonary collateral flow volume affects early postoperative outcome after Fontan completion: a multimodality study. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(6):1329–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. 91.

    Odenwald T, Quail MA, Giardini A, et al. Systemic to pulmonary collateral blood flow influences early outcomes following the total cavopulmonary connection. Heart. 2012;98(12):934–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  92. 92.

    Margossian R, Schwartz ML, Prakash A, et al. Comparison of echocardiographic and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging measurements of functional single ventricular volumes, mass, and ejection fraction (from the Pediatric Heart Network Fontan Cross-Sectional Study). Am J Cardiol. 2009;104(3):419–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  93. 93.

    Williams RV, Margossian R, Lu M, et al. Factors impacting echocardiographic imaging after the Fontan procedure: a report from the pediatric heart network fontan cross-sectional study. Echocardiography. 2013;30(9):1098–106.

    Google Scholar 

  94. 94.

    Rathod RH, Prakash A, Kim YY, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance parameters predict transplantation-free survival in patients with fontan circulation. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;7(3):502–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  95. 95.

    Schwenk MH. Ferumoxytol: a new intravenous iron preparation for the treatment of iron deficiency anemia in patients with chronic kidney disease. Pharmacotherapy. 2010;30(1):70–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  96. 96.

    Bashir MR, Bhatti L, Marin D, Nelson RC. Emerging applications for ferumoxytol as a contrast agent in MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(4):884–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  97. 97.

    Edelman RR, Koktzoglou I. Noncontrast MR angiography: an update. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;49(2):355–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  98. 98.

    Versluis B, Nelemans PJ, Brans R, et al. Functional MRI in peripheral arterial disease: arterial peak flow versus ankle-brachial index. PLoS ONE. 2014;9(2):e88471.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  99. 99.

    Mosca RS, Kulik TJ, Marshall K, Hernandez R, Fletcher SE. Mycotic pseudoaneurysm associated with aortic coarctation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2000;2(3):209–12.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  100. 100.

    Akins EW, Slone RM, Wiechmann BN, Browning M, Martin TD, Mayfield WR. Perivalvular pseudoaneurysm complicating bacterial endocarditis: MR detection in five cases. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1991;156(6):1155–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  101. 101.

    Engellau L, Larsson EM, Albrechtsson U, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging and MR angiography of endoluminally treated abdominal aortic aneurysms. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 1998;15(3):212–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  102. 102.

    Anbarasu A, Harris PL, McWilliams RG. The role of gadolinium-enhanced MR imaging in the preoperative evaluation of inflammatory abdominal aortic aneurysm. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(Suppl 3):S192-195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  103. 103.

    Cejna M, Loewe C, Schoder M, et al. MR angiography vs CT angiography in the follow-up of nitinol stent grafts in endoluminally treated aortic aneurysms. Eur Radiol. 2002;12(10):2443–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  104. 104.

    Leiner T, Habets J, Versluis B, et al. Subtractionless first-pass single contrast medium dose peripheral MR angiography using two-point Dixon fat suppression. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(8):2228–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  105. 105.

    Habets J, Zandvoort HJ, Moll FL, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging with a weak albumin binding contrast agent can reveal additional endoleaks in patients with an enlarging aneurysm after EVAR. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2015;50(3):331–40.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  106. 106.

    Serhal A, Koktzoglou I, Aouad P, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging of aorto-iliac and ilio-femoral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted in-phase stack of stars. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  107. 107.

    Markl M, Kilner PJ, Ebbers T. Comprehensive 4D velocity mapping of the heart and great vessels by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13:7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  108. 108.

    Chin AS, Willemink MJ, Kino A, et al. Acute limited intimal tears of the thoracic aorta. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(24):2773–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. 109.

    Mussa FF, Horton JD, Moridzadeh R, Nicholson J, Trimarchi S, Eagle KA. Acute aortic dissection and intramural hematoma: a systematic review. JAMA. 2016;316(7):754–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  110. 110.

    Goldstein SA, Evangelista A, Abbara S, et al. Multimodality imaging of diseases of the thoracic aorta in adults: from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging: endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography and Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2015;28(2):119–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  111. 111.

    Hayashi H, Matsuoka Y, Sakamoto I, et al. Penetrating atherosclerotic ulcer of the aorta: imaging features and disease concept. Radiographics. 2000;20(4):995–1005.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  112. 112.

    Evangelista A, Czerny M, Nienaber C, et al. Interdisciplinary expert consensus on management of type B intramural haematoma and penetrating aortic ulcer. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015;47(2):209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  113. 113.

    Bosma MS, Quint LE, Williams DM, Patel HJ, Jiang Q, Myles JD. Ulcerlike projections developing in noncommunicating aortic dissections: CT findings and natural history. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193(3):895–905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  114. 114.

    Wehrum T, Dragonu I, Strecker C, et al. Aortic atheroma as a source of stroke - assessment of embolization risk using 3D CMR in stroke patients and controls. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  115. 115.

    Brinjikji W, Huston J 3rd, Rabinstein AA, Kim GM, Lerman A, Lanzino G. Contemporary carotid imaging: from degree of stenosis to plaque vulnerability. J Neurosurg. 2016;124(1):27–42.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  116. 116.

    DeMarco JK, Willinek WA, Finn JP, Huston J. Current state-of-the-art 1.5 T and 3 T extracranial carotid contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2012;22(2):235–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  117. 117.

    Koktzoglou I, Walker MT, Meyer JR, Murphy IG, Edelman RR. Nonenhanced hybridized arterial spin labeled magnetic resonance angiography of the extracranial carotid arteries using a fast low angle shot readout at 3 Tesla. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  118. 118.

    Johns CS, Swift AJ, Hughes PJC, Ohno Y, Schiebler M, Wild JM. Pulmonary MR angiography and perfusion imaging-a review of methods and applications. Eur J Radiol. 2017;86:361–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  119. 119.

    Stein PD, Chenevert TL, Fowler SE, et al. Gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism: a multicenter prospective study (PIOPED III). Ann Intern Med. 2010;152(7):434–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  120. 120.

    Sostman HD, Jablonski KA, Woodard PK, et al. Factors in the technical quality of gadolinium enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for pulmonary embolism in PIOPED III. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;28(2):303–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  121. 121.

    Kaya F, Ufuk F, Karabulut N. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced and unenhanced combined pulmonary artery MRI and magnetic resonance venography techniques in the diagnosis of venous thromboembolism. Br J Radiol. 2019;92(1095):20180695.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  122. 122.

    Vijarnsorn C, Rutledge JM, Tham EB, et al. Which cardiovascular magnetic resonance planes and sequences provide accurate measurements of branch pulmonary artery size in children with right ventricular outflow tract obstruction? Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;30(2):329–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  123. 123.

    Steendam CMJ, Diederik AL, Dendooven A, Snijder RJ, Herder GJ. Pulmonary artery aneurysms and thrombi. Thorax. 2017;72(12):1167–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  124. 124.

    Westaby S, Evans BJ, Ormerod O. Pulmonary-artery dissection in patients with Eisenmenger’s syndrome. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(20):2110–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  125. 125.

    Ayache JB, Collins JD. MR angiography of the abdomen and pelvis. Radiol Clin North Am. 2014;52(4):839–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  126. 126.

    Zeng M, Cheng Y, Zhao B. Measurement of single-kidney glomerular filtration function from magnetic resonance perfusion renography. Eur J Radiol. 2015;84(8):1419–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. 127.

    Cooper CJ, Murphy TP, Cutlip DE, et al. Stenting and medical therapy for atherosclerotic renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2014;370(1):13–22.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  128. 128.

    Investigators A, Wheatley K, Ives N, et al. Revascularization versus medical therapy for renal-artery stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;361(20):1953–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. 129.

    Persu A, Jin Y, Azizi M, et al. Blood pressure changes after renal denervation at 10 European expert centers. J Hum Hypertens. 2014;28(3):150–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  130. 130.

    Fadl Elmula FE, Jin Y, Yang WY, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials of renal denervation in treatment-resistant hypertension. Blood Press. 2015;24(5):263–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  131. 131.

    Sanders MF, van Doormaal PJ, Beeftink MMA, et al. Renal artery and parenchymal changes after renal denervation: assessment by magnetic resonance angiography. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(9):3934–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. 132.

    Hagspiel KD, Flors L, Hanley M, Norton PT. Computed tomography angiography and magnetic resonance angiography imaging of the mesenteric vasculature. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2015;18(1):2–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. 133.

    Nelemans PJ, Leiner T, de Vet HC, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral arterial disease: meta-analysis of the diagnostic performance of MR angiography. Radiology. 2000;217(1):105–14.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  134. 134.

    Koelemay MJ, Lijmer JG, Stoker J, Legemate DA, Bossuyt PM. Magnetic resonance angiography for the evaluation of lower extremity arterial disease: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2001;285(10):1338–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  135. 135.

    Menke J, Larsen J. Meta-analysis: accuracy of contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for assessing steno-occlusions in peripheral arterial disease. Ann Intern Med. 2010;153(5):325–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  136. 136.

    Jens S, Koelemay MJ, Reekers JA, Bipat S. Diagnostic performance of computed tomography angiography and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography in patients with critical limb ischaemia and intermittent claudication: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(11):3104–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  137. 137.

    Ho KY, Leiner T, de Haan MW, Kessels AG, Kitslaar PJ, van Engelshoven JM. Peripheral vascular tree stenoses: evaluation with moving-bed infusion-tracking MR angiography. Radiology. 1998;206(3):683–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  138. 138.

    Dolcini C, Dolcini BM, Fioroni P, Lolli F, Brunetti O, Capolsini ST. Ultrastructural details in some muscular dystrophies in humans. Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper. 1976;52(9):616–22.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  139. 139.

    Leiner T, Ho KY, Nelemans PJ, de Haan MW, van Engelshoven JM. Three-dimensional contrast-enhanced moving-bed infusion-tracking (MoBI-track) peripheral MR angiography with flexible choice of imaging parameters for each field of view. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2000;11(4):368–77.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  140. 140.

    Leiner T. Magnetic resonance angiography of abdominal and lower extremity vasculature. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;16(1):21–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  141. 141.

    Hodnett PA, Koktzoglou I, Davarpanah AH, et al. Evaluation of peripheral arterial disease with nonenhanced quiescent-interval single-shot MR angiography. Radiology. 2011;260(1):282–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. 142.

    Ferreira Botelho MP, Koktzoglou I, Collins JD, et al. MR imaging of iliofemoral peripheral vascular calcifications using proton density-weighted, in-phase three-dimensional stack-of-stars gradient echo. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(6):2146–52.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  143. 143.

    Eikendal AL, Blomberg BA, Haaring C, et al. 3D black blood VISTA vessel wall cardiovascular magnetic resonance of the thoracic aorta wall in young, healthy adults: reproducibility and implications for efficacy trial sample sizes: a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18:20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  144. 144.

    Treitl KM, Maurus S, Sommer NN, et al. 3D-black-blood 3T-MRI for the diagnosis of thoracic large vessel vasculitis: a feasibility study. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(5):2119–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  145. 145.

    Kerwin WS, Miller Z, Yuan C. Imaging of the high-risk carotid plaque: magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Vasc Surg. 2017;30(1):54–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  146. 146.

    Yuan C, Parker DL. Three-dimensional carotid plaque MR imaging. Neuroimaging Clin N Am. 2016;26(1):1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. 147.

    Mihai G, Chung YC, Kariisa M, Raman SV, Simonetti OP, Rajagopalan S. Initial feasibility of a multi-station high resolution three-dimensional dark blood angiography protocol for the assessment of peripheral arterial disease. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(4):785–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. 148.

    Han Y, Guan M, Zhu Z, et al. Assessment of longitudinal distribution of subclinical atherosclerosis in femoral arteries by three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  149. 149.

    Gerretsen S, Kessels AG, Nelemans PJ, et al. Detection of coronary plaques using MR coronary vessel wall imaging: validation of findings with intravascular ultrasound. Eur Radiol. 2013;23(1):115–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  150. 150.

    Cruz G, Atkinson D, Henningsson M, Botnar RM, Prieto C. Highly efficient nonrigid motion-corrected 3D whole-heart coronary vessel wall imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(5):1894–908.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  151. 151.

    Dieleman N, van der Kolk AG, Zwanenburg JJ, et al. Imaging intracranial vessel wall pathology with magnetic resonance imaging: current prospects and future directions. Circulation. 2014;130(2):192–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  152. 152.

    Zhu C, Tian B, Chen L, et al. Accelerated whole brain intracranial vessel wall imaging using black blood fast spin echo with compressed sensing (CS-SPACE). MAGMA. 2018;31(3):457–67.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  153. 153.

    Chen S, Ning J, Zhao X, et al. Fast simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (fSNAP) sequence for carotid artery imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(2):753–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. 154.

    Qi H, Sun J, Qiao H, et al. Simultaneous T1 and T2 mapping of the carotid plaque (SIMPLE) with T2 and inversion recovery prepared 3D radial imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2018;80(6):2598–608.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  155. 155.

    Sommer NN, Treitl KM, Coppenrath E, et al. Three-dimensional high-resolution black-blood magnetic resonance imaging for detection of arteritic anterior ischemic optic neuropathy in patients with giant cell arteritis. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(11):698–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  156. 156.

    Guggenberger KV, Bley TA. Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance angiography in large-vessel vasculitides. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2018;36(5):103–7.

    Google Scholar 

  157. 157.

    Schwarz F, Strobl FF, Cyran CC, et al. Reproducibility and differentiation of cervical arteriopathies using in vivo high-resolution black-blood MRI at 3 T. Neuroradiology. 2016;58(6):569–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  158. 158.

    Wentland AL, Grist TM, Wieben O. Review of MRI-based measurements of pulse wave velocity: a biomarker of arterial stiffness. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2014;4(2):193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  159. 159.

    McCulloch MA, Mauras N, Canas JA, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging measures of decreased aortic strain and distensibility are proportionate to insulin resistance in adolescents with type 1 diabetes mellitus. Pediatr Diabetes. 2015;16(2):90–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  160. 160.

    Eikendal ALM, Bots ML, Gohar A, et al. Circulating levels of P-selectin and E-selectin relate to cardiovascular magnetic resonance-derived aortic characteristics in young adults from the general population, a cross-sectional study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2018;20(1):54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. 161.

    Eikendal ALM, den Ruijter HM, Haaring C, et al. Sex, body mass index, and blood pressure are related to aortic characteristics in healthy, young adults using magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: the AMBITYON study. MAGMA. 2018;31(1):173–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  162. 162.

    de Roos A, van der Grond J, Mitchell G, Westenberg J. Magnetic resonance imaging of cardiovascular function and the brain: is dementia a cardiovascular-driven disease? Circulation. 2017;135(22):2178–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  163. 163.

    Celermajer DS, Sorensen KE, Gooch VM, et al. Non-invasive detection of endothelial dysfunction in children and adults at risk of atherosclerosis. Lancet. 1992;340(8828):1111–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  164. 164.

    Sorensen MB, Collins P, Ong PJ, et al. Long-term use of contraceptive depot medroxyprogesterone acetate in young women impairs arterial endothelial function assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2002;106(13):1646–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  165. 165.

    Silber HA, Bluemke DA, Ouyang P, Du YP, Post WS, Lima JA. The relationship between vascular wall shear stress and flow-mediated dilation: endothelial function assessed by phase-contrast magnetic resonance angiography. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;38(7):1859–65.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  166. 166.

    Mohiaddin RH, Gatehousee D, Moon JC, et al. Assessment of reactive hyperaemia using real time zonal echo-planar flow imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2002;4(2):283–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  167. 167.

    Cuypers J, Leirgul E, Larsen TH, Berg A, Omdal TR, Greve G. Assessment of vascular reactivity in the peripheral and coronary arteries by Cine 3T-magnetic resonance imaging in young normotensive adults after surgery for coarctation of the aorta. Pediatr Cardiol. 2013;34(3):661–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  168. 168.

    Silber HA, Lima JA, Bluemke DA, et al. Arterial reactivity in lower extremities is progressively reduced as cardiovascular risk factors increase: comparison with upper extremities using magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2007;49(9):939–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  169. 169.

    Mueller GC, Lu JC, Mahani MG, Dorfman AL, Agarwal PP. MR Imaging of Thoracic Veins. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2015;23(2):293–307.

  170. 170.

    Aljaroudi WA, Saliba WS, Wazni OM, Jaber WA. Role of cardiac computed tomography and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in guiding management and treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation: state of the art review. J Nucl Cardiol. 2013;20(3):426–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  171. 171.

    Sonavane SK, Milner DM, Singh SP, Abdel Aal AK, Shahir KS, Chaturvedi A. Comprehensive imaging review of the superior vena cava. Radiographics. 2015;35(7):1873–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  172. 172.

    Bode AS, Planken RN, Merkx MA, et al. Feasibility of non-contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for imaging upper extremity vasculature prior to vascular access creation. Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2012;43(1):88–94.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  173. 173.

    Zucker EJ, Ganguli S, Ghoshhajra BB, Gupta R, Prabhakar AM. Imaging of venous compression syndromes. Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2016;6(6):519–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  174. 174.

    Dolic K, Siddiqui AH, Karmon Y, Marr K, Zivadinov R. The role of noninvasive and invasive diagnostic imaging techniques for detection of extra-cranial venous system anomalies and developmental variants. BMC Med. 2013;11:155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  175. 175.

    Dronkers CEA, Klok FA, van Haren GR, et al. Diagnosing upper extremity deep vein thrombosis with non-contrast-enhanced Magnetic Resonance Direct Thrombus Imaging: a pilot study. Thromb Res. 2018;163:47–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  176. 176.

    Treitl KM, Treitl M, Kooijman-Kurfuerst H, et al. Three-dimensional black-blood T1-weighted turbo spin-echo techniques for the diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in comparison with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging: a pilot study. Invest Radiol. 2015;50(6):401–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  177. 177.

    Kim CY, Bashir MR, Heye T, Dale BM, Nichols HL, Merkle EM. Respiratory-gated noncontrast SPACE MR angiography sequence at 3T for evaluation of the central veins of the chest: a feasibility study. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015;41(1):67–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  178. 178.

    Aime S, Caravan P. Biodistribution of gadolinium-based contrast agents, including gadolinium deposition. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009;30(6):1259–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  179. 179.

    Finn JP, Nguyen KL, Han F, et al. Cardiovascular MRI with ferumoxytol. Clin Radiol. 2016;71(8):796–806.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  180. 180.

    Nguyen KL, Han F, Zhou Z, et al. 4D MUSIC CMR: value-based imaging of neonates and infants with congenital heart disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  181. 181.

    Nguyen KL, Moriarty JM, Plotnik AN, et al. Ferumoxytol-enhanced MR angiography for vascular access mapping before transcatheter aortic valve replacement in patients with renal impairment: a step toward patient-specific care. Radiology. 2018;286(1):326–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  182. 182.

    Stoumpos S, Hennessy M, Vesey AT, et al. Ferumoxytol-enhanced magnetic resonance angiography for the assessment of potential kidney transplant recipients. Eur Radiol. 2018;28(1):115–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  183. 183.

    Lehrman ED, Plotnik AN, Hope T, Saloner D. Ferumoxytol-enhanced MRI in the peripheral vasculature. Clin Radiol. 2019;74(1):37–50.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  184. 184.

    Schwitter J, Arai AE. Assessment of cardiac ischaemia and viability: role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(7):799–809.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  185. 185.

    Eitel I, Desch S, de Waha S, et al. Long-term prognostic value of myocardial salvage assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute reperfused myocardial infarction. Heart. 2011;97(24):2038–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  186. 186.

    Ghugre NR, Pop M, Thomas R, et al. Hemorrhage promotes inflammation and myocardial damage following acute myocardial infarction: insights from a novel preclinical model and cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  187. 187.

    Masci PG, Francone M, Desmet W, et al. Right ventricular ischemic injury in patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: characterization with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2010;122(14):1405–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  188. 188.

    Eitel I, Kubusch K, Strohm O, et al. Prognostic value and determinants of a hypointense infarct core in T2-weighted cardiac magnetic resonance in acute reperfused ST-elevation-myocardial infarction. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(4):354–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  189. 189.

    Symons R, Pontone G, Schwitter J, et al. Long-term incremental prognostic value of cardiovascular magnetic resonance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: a study of the collaborative registry on CMR in STEMI. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(6):813–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  190. 190.

    Bulluck H, Dharmakumar R, Arai AE, Berry C, Hausenloy DJ. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in acute st-segment-elevation myocardial infarction: recent advances, controversies, and future directions. Circulation. 2018;137(18):1949–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  191. 191.

    Carrick D, Oldroyd KG, McEntegart M, et al. A randomized trial of deferred stenting versus immediate stenting to prevent no- or slow-reflow in acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (DEFER-STEMI). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;63(20):2088–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  192. 192.

    Bulluck H, Frohlich GM, Nicholas JM, et al. Mineralocorticoid receptor antagonist pre-treatment and early post-treatment to minimize reperfusion injury after ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the MINIMIZE STEMI trial. Am Heart J. 2019;211:60–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  193. 193.

    Raman SV, Simonetti OP, Winner MW 3rd, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance with edema imaging identifies myocardium at risk and predicts worse outcome in patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;55(22):2480–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  194. 194.

    Thiele H, Rach J, Klein N, et al. Optimal timing of invasive angiography in stable non-ST-elevation myocardial infarction: the Leipzig Immediate versus early and late PercutaneouS coronary Intervention triAl in NSTEMI (LIPSIA-NSTEMI Trial). Eur Heart J. 2012;33(16):2035–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  195. 195.

    Thiele H, de Waha S, Zeymer U, et al. Effect of aspiration thrombectomy on microvascular obstruction in NSTEMI patients: the TATORT-NSTEMI trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014;64(11):1117–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  196. 196.

    Greenwood JP, Maredia N, Younger JF, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single-photon emission computed tomography for diagnosis of coronary heart disease (CE-MARC): a prospective trial. Lancet. 2012;379(9814):453–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  197. 197.

    Schwitter J, Wacker CM, Wilke N, et al. MR-IMPACT II: Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Myocardial Perfusion Assessment in Coronary artery disease Trial: perfusion-cardiac magnetic resonance vs. single-photon emission computed tomography for the detection of coronary artery disease: a comparative multicentre, multivendor trial. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(10):775–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  198. 198.

    Greenwood JP, Ripley DP, Berry C, et al. Effect of care guided by cardiovascular magnetic resonance, myocardial perfusion scintigraphy, or NICE Guidelines on Subsequent Unnecessary Angiography Rates: the CE-MARC 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016;316(10):1051–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  199. 199.

    Foley JRJ, Kidambi A, Biglands JD, et al. A comparison of cardiovascular magnetic resonance and single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) perfusion imaging in left main stem or equivalent coronary artery disease: a CE-MARC substudy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  200. 200.

    Nagel E, Greenwood JP, McCann GP, et al. Magnetic resonance perfusion or fractional flow reserve in coronary disease. N Engl J Med. 2019;380(25):2418–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  201. 201.

    Schuster A, Morton G, Chiribiri A, Perera D, Vanoverschelde JL, Nagel E. Imaging in the management of ischemic cardiomyopathy: special focus on magnetic resonance. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012;59(4):359–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  202. 202.

    Miller CD, Case LD, Little WC, et al. Stress CMR reduces revascularization, hospital readmission, and recurrent cardiac testing in intermediate-risk patients with acute chest pain. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(7):785–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  203. 203.

    Tornvall P, Gerbaud E, Behaghel A, et al. Myocarditis or “true” infarction by cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with a clinical diagnosis of myocardial infarction without obstructive coronary disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data. Atherosclerosis. 2015;241(1):87–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  204. 204.

    Thygesen K, Alpert JS, Jaffe AS, et al. Fourth Universal Definition of Myocardial Infarction (2018). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(18):2231–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  205. 205.

    Dastidar AG, Baritussio A, De Garate E, et al. Prognostic role of CMR and conventional risk factors in myocardial infarction with nonobstructed coronary arteries. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(10):1973–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  206. 206.

    Perez-Pomares JM, de la Pompa JL, Franco D, et al. Congenital coronary artery anomalies: a bridge from embryology to anatomy and pathophysiology–a position statement of the development, anatomy, and pathology ESC Working Group. Cardiovasc Res. 2016;109(2):204–16.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  207. 207.

    Piccini D, Monney P, Sierro C, et al. Respiratory self-navigated postcontrast whole-heart coronary MR angiography: initial experience in patients. Radiology. 2014;270(2):378–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  208. 208.

    Mavrogeni S, Papadopoulos G, Hussain T, Chiribiri A, Botnar R, Greil GF. The emerging role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the evaluation of Kawasaki disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;29(8):1787–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  209. 209.

    Muthusami P, Luining W, McCrindle B, et al. Myocardial perfusion, fibrosis, and contractility in children with Kawasaki Disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(12):1922–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  210. 210.

    Verdoni L, Mazza A, Gervasoni A, et al. An outbreak of severe Kawasaki-like disease at the Italian epicentre of the SARS-CoV-2 epidemic: an observational cohort study. Lancet. 2020;395(10239):1771–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  211. 211.

    Arbustini E, Narula N, Dec GW, et al. The MOGE(S) classification for a phenotype-genotype nomenclature of cardiomyopathy: endorsed by the World Heart Federation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;62(22):2046–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  212. 212.

    Rapezzi C, Arbustini E, Caforio AL, et al. Diagnostic work-up in cardiomyopathies: bridging the gap between clinical phenotypes and final diagnosis. A position statement from the ESC Working Group on Myocardial and Pericardial Diseases. Eur Heart J. 2013;34(19):1448–58.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  213. 213.

    von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Schulz-Menger J. Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in the guidelines of the European Society of Cardiology. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  214. 214.

    American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus D, Hundley WG, Bluemke DA, et al. ACCF/ACR/AHA/NASCI/SCMR 2010 expert consensus document on cardiovascular magnetic resonance: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Task Force on Expert Consensus Documents. J Am Coll Cardiol 2010;55(23):2614–2662.

  215. 215.

    Lawson MA, Blackwell GG, Davis ND, Roney M, Dell’Italia LJ, Pohost GM. Accuracy of biplane long-axis left ventricular volume determined by cine magnetic resonance imaging in patients with regional and global dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 1996;77(12):1098–104.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  216. 216.

    Bloomer TN, Plein S, Radjenovic A, et al. Cine MRI using steady state free precession in the radial long axis orientation is a fast accurate method for obtaining volumetric data of the left ventricle. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001;14(6):685–92.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  217. 217.

    Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Normalized left ventricular systolic and diastolic function by steady state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006a;8(3):417–26.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  218. 218.

    Le Ven F, Bibeau K, De Larochelliere E, et al. Cardiac morphology and function reference values derived from a large subset of healthy young Caucasian adults by magnetic resonance imaging. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;17(9):981–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  219. 219.

    Schulz-Menger J, Bluemke DA, Bremerich J, et al. Standardized image interpretation and post processing in cardiovascular magnetic resonance: Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) board of trustees task force on standardized post processing. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013;15(1):35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  220. 220.

    Hudsmith LE, Petersen SE, Francis JM, Robson MD, Neubauer S. Normal human left and right ventricular and left atrial dimensions using steady state free precession magnetic resonance imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7(5):775–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  221. 221.

    Maceira AM, Prasad SK, Khan M, Pennell DJ. Reference right ventricular systolic and diastolic function normalized to age, gender and body surface area from steady-state free precession cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Eur Heart J. 2006b;27(23):2879–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  222. 222.

    Carbone I, Friedrich MG. Myocardial edema imaging by cardiovascular magnetic resonance: current status and future potential. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14(1):1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  223. 223.

    Kumar A, Green JD, Sykes JM, et al. Detection and quantification of myocardial reperfusion hemorrhage using T2*-weighted CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(12):1274–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  224. 224.

    Mather AN, Fairbairn TA, Ball SG, Greenwood JP, Plein S. Reperfusion haemorrhage as determined by cardiovascular MRI is a predictor of adverse left ventricular remodelling and markers of late arrhythmic risk. Heart. 2011;97(6):453–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  225. 225.

    Messroghli DR, Moon JC, Ferreira VM, et al. Clinical recommendations for cardiovascular magnetic resonance mapping of T1, T2, T2* and extracellular volume: a consensus statement by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance (SCMR) endorsed by the European Association for Cardiovascular Imaging (EACVI). J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  226. 226.

    Fujita N, Duerinekx AJ, Higgins CB. Variation in left ventricular regional wall stress with cine magnetic resonance imaging: normal subjects versus dilated cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 1993;125(5 Pt 1):1337–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  227. 227.

    Crean AM, Maredia N, Ballard G, et al. 3D Echo systematically underestimates right ventricular volumes compared to cardiovascular magnetic resonance in adult congenital heart disease patients with moderate or severe RV dilatation. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2011;13(1):78.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  228. 228.

    McCrohon JA, Moon JC, Prasad SK, et al. Differentiation of heart failure related to dilated cardiomyopathy and coronary artery disease using gadolinium-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Circulation. 2003;108(1):54–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  229. 229.

    Assomull RG, Prasad SK, Lyne J, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance, fibrosis, and prognosis in dilated cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(10):1977–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  230. 230.

    Puntmann VO, Voigt T, Chen Z, et al. Native T1 mapping in differentiation of normal myocardium from diffuse disease in hypertrophic and dilated cardiomyopathy. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(4):475–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  231. 231.

    Ausdem Siepen F, Buss SJ, Messroghli D, et al. T1 mapping in dilated cardiomyopathy with cardiac magnetic resonance: quantification of diffuse myocardial fibrosis and comparison with endomyocardial biopsy. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;16(2):210–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  232. 232.

    Chetrit M, Friedrich MG. The unique role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in acute myocarditis. F1000Res. 2018;7:1153.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  233. 233.

    Biesbroek PS, Hirsch A, Zweerink A, et al. Additional diagnostic value of CMR to the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) position statement criteria in a large clinical population of patients with suspected myocarditis. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;19(12):1397–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  234. 234.

    Patriki D, Gresser E, Manka R, Emmert MY, Luscher TF, Heidecker B. Approximation of the incidence of myocarditis by systematic screening with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. JACC Heart Fail. 2018;6(7):573–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  235. 235.

    Ferreira VM, Schulz-Menger J, Holmvang G, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in nonischemic myocardial inflammation: expert recommendations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(24):3158–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  236. 236.

    Gagliardi MG, Bevilacqua M, Di Renzi P, Picardo S, Passariello R, Marcelletti C. Usefulness of magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis of acute myocarditis in infants and children, and comparison with endomyocardial biopsy. Am J Cardiol. 1991;68(10):1089–91.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  237. 237.

    Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, Zagrosek A, et al. Diagnostic performance of cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with suspected acute myocarditis: comparison of different approaches. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;45(11):1815–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  238. 238.

    Jeserich M, Foll D, Olschewski M, et al. Evidence of myocardial edema in patients with nonischemic dilated cardiomyopathy. Clin Cardiol. 2012;35(6):371–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  239. 239.

    Bohl S, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H, et al. Delayed enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging reveals typical patterns of myocardial injury in patients with various forms of non-ischemic heart disease. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2008;24(6):597–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  240. 240.

    De Cobelli F, Pieroni M, Esposito A, et al. Delayed gadolinium-enhanced cardiac magnetic resonance in patients with chronic myocarditis presenting with heart failure or recurrent arrhythmias. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;47(8):1649–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  241. 241.

    Zagrosek A, Abdel-Aty H, Boye P, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance monitors reversible and irreversible myocardial injury in myocarditis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(2):131–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  242. 242.

    Hindieh W, Weissler-Snir A, Hammer H, Adler A, Rakowski H, Chan RH. Discrepant measurements of maximal left ventricular wall thickness between cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and echocardiography in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(8):e006309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  243. 243.

    Olivotto I, Maron MS, Autore C, et al. Assessment and significance of left ventricular mass by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52(7):559–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  244. 244.

    Germans T, Wilde AA, Dijkmans PA, et al. Structural abnormalities of the inferoseptal left ventricular wall detected by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in carriers of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy mutations. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006;48(12):2518–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  245. 245.

    Brouwer WP, Germans T, Head MC, et al. Multiple myocardial crypts on modified long-axis view are a specific finding in pre-hypertrophic HCM mutation carriers. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;13(4):292–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  246. 246.

    Tower-Rader A, Mohananey D, To A, Lever HM, Popovic ZB, Desai MY. Prognostic value of global longitudinal strain in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a systematic review of existing literature. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;12:1930–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  247. 247.

    Moon JC, Reed E, Sheppard MN, et al. The histologic basis of late gadolinium enhancement cardiovascular magnetic resonance in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43(12):2260–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  248. 248.

    Wilson JM, Villareal RP, Hariharan R, Massumi A, Muthupillai R, Flamm SD. Magnetic resonance imaging of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Tex Heart Inst J. 2002;29(3):176–80.

    Google Scholar 

  249. 249.

    O’Hanlon R, Grasso A, Roughton M, et al. Prognostic significance of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56(11):867–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  250. 250.

    Chan RH, Maron BJ, Olivotto I, et al. Prognostic value of quantitative contrast-enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the evaluation of sudden death risk in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2014;130(6):484–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  251. 251.

    Kramer CM, Appelbaum E, Desai MY, et al. Hypertrophic Cardiomyopathy Registry: the rationale and design of an international, observational study of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Am Heart J. 2015;170(2):223–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  252. 252.

    Abdel-Aty H, Cocker M, Strohm O, Filipchuk N, Friedrich MG. Abnormalities in T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance images of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: regional distribution and relation to late gadolinium enhancement and severity of hypertrophy. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008;28(1):242–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  253. 253.

    Schulz-Menger J, Strohm O, Waigand J, Uhlich F, Dietz R, Friedrich MG. The value of magnetic resonance imaging of the left ventricular outflow tract in patients with hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy after septal artery embolization. Circulation. 2000;101(15):1764–6.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  254. 254.

    Schulz-Menger J, Wassmuth R, Abdel-Aty H, et al. Patterns of myocardial inflammation and scarring in sarcoidosis as assessed by cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Heart. 2006;92(3):399–400.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  255. 255.

    Ellims AH, Iles LM, Ling LH, et al. A comprehensive evaluation of myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: linking genotype with fibrotic phenotype. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014;15(10):1108–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  256. 256.

    Swoboda PP, McDiarmid AK, Erhayiem B, et al. Effect of cellular and extracellular pathology assessed by T1 mapping on regional contractile function in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017;19(1):16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  257. 257.

    Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Francis JM, et al. Differentiation of athlete’s heart from pathological forms of cardiac hypertrophy by means of geometric indices derived from cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2005;7(3):551–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  258. 258.

    Swoboda PP, Erhayiem B, McDiarmid AK, et al. Relationship between cardiac deformation parameters measured by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and aerobic fitness in endurance athletes. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  259. 259.

    Jain A, Tandri H, Calkins H, Bluemke DA. Role of cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10(1):32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  260. 260.

    Miles C, Finocchiaro G, Papadakis M, et al. Sudden death and left ventricular involvement in arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2019;139(15):1786–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  261. 261.

    Gandjbakhch E, Redheuil A, Pousset F, Charron P, Frank R. Clinical diagnosis, imaging, and genetics of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: JACC State-of-the-Art Review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;72(7):784–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  262. 262.

    Dalal D, Tandri H, Judge DP, et al. Morphologic variants of familial arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy a genetics-magnetic resonance imaging correlation study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53(15):1289–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  263. 263.

    McKenna WJ, Thiene G, Nava A, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular dysplasia/cardiomyopathy. Task Force of the Working Group Myocardial and Pericardial Disease of the European Society of Cardiology and of the Scientific Council on Cardiomyopathies of the International Society and Federation of Cardiology. Br Heart J. 1994;71(3):215–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  264. 264.

    Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, et al. Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the task force criteria. Circulation. 2010;121(13):1533–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  265. 265.

    Vermes E, Strohm O, Otmani A, Childs H, Duff H, Friedrich MG. Impact of the revision of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia task force criteria on its prevalence by CMR criteria. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(3):282–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  266. 266.

    Karamitsos TD, Piechnik SK, Banypersad SM, et al. Noncontrast T1 mapping for the diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(4):488–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  267. 267.

    Maceira AM, Joshi J, Prasad SK, et al. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance in cardiac amyloidosis. Circulation. 2005;111(2):186–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  268. 268.

    Anderson LJ, Holden S, Davis B, et al. Cardiovascular T2-star (T2*) magnetic resonance for the early diagnosis of myocardial iron overload. Eur Heart J. 2001;22(23):2171–9.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  269. 269.

    Anderson LJ, Wonke B, Prescott E, Holden S, Walker JM, Pennell DJ. Comparison of effects of oral deferiprone and subcutaneous desferrioxamine on myocardial iron concentrations and ventricular function in beta-thalassaemia. Lancet. 2002;360(9332):516–20.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  270. 270.

    Kirk P, Roughton M, Porter JB, et al. Cardiac T2* magnetic resonance for prediction of cardiac complications in thalassemia major. Circulation. 2009;120(20):1961–8.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  271. 271.

    Modell B, Khan M, Darlison M, Westwood MA, Ingram D, Pennell DJ. Improved survival of thalassaemia major in the UK and relation to T2* cardiovascular magnetic resonance. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008;10(1):42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  272. 272.

    Carpenter JP, He T, Kirk P, et al. On T2* magnetic resonance and cardiac iron. Circulation. 2011;123(14):1519–28.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  273. 273.

    Sado D, White SK, Piechnik SK, et al. Native T1 lowering in iron overload and Anderson Fabry disease; a novel and early marker of disease. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013a;15(S1):O71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  274. 274.

    Alam MH, Auger D, McGill LA, et al. Comparison of 3 T and 1.5 T for T2* magnetic resonance of tissue iron. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  275. 275.

    Jenni R, Oechslin E, Schneider J, Attenhofer Jost C, Kaufmann PA. Echocardiographic and pathoanatomical characteristics of isolated left ventricular non-compaction: a step towards classification as a distinct cardiomyopathy. Heart. 2001;86(6):666–71.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  276. 276.

    Towbin JA, Lorts A, Jefferies JL. Left ventricular non-compaction cardiomyopathy. Lancet. 2015;386(9995):813–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  277. 277.

    Amzulescu MS, Rousseau MF, Ahn SA, et al. Prognostic impact of hypertrabeculation and noncompaction phenotype in dilated cardiomyopathy: a CMR Study. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(8):934–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  278. 278.

    Lorca R, Martin M, Gomez J, et al. Hypertrophic cardiomyopathy and left ventricular non-compaction: different manifestations of the same cardiomyopathy spectrum? Int J Cardiol. 2015;190:26–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  279. 279.

    Petersen SE, Selvanayagam JB, Wiesmann F, et al. Left ventricular non-compaction: insights from cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2005;46(1):101–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  280. 280.

    Kawel N, Nacif M, Arai AE, et al. Trabeculated (noncompacted) and compact myocardium in adults: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(3):357–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  281. 281.

    Weir-McCall JR, Yeap PM, Papagiorcopulo C, et al. Left ventricular noncompaction: anatomical phenotype or distinct cardiomyopathy? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(20):2157–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  282. 282.

    Ashrith G, Gupta D, Hanmer J, Weiss RM. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance characterization of left ventricular non-compaction provides independent prognostic information in patients with incident heart failure or suspected cardiomyopathy. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014;16(1):64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  283. 283.

    Jacquier A, Thuny F, Jop B, et al. Measurement of trabeculated left ventricular mass using cardiac magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction. Eur Heart J. 2010;31(9):1098–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  284. 284.

    Choi Y, Kim SM, Lee SC, Chang SA, Jang SY, Choe YH. Quantification of left ventricular trabeculae using cardiovascular magnetic resonance for the diagnosis of left ventricular non-compaction: evaluation of trabecular volume and refined semi-quantitative criteria. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  285. 285.

    Boban M, Pesa V, Gabric ID, et al. Auxiliary diagnostic potential of ventricle geometry and late gadolinium enhancement in left ventricular non-compaction; non-randomized case control study. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2017;17(1):286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  286. 286.

    Grigoratos C, Barison A, Ivanov A, et al. Meta-analysis of the prognostic role of late gadolinium enhancement and global systolic impairment in left ventricular noncompaction. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(11 Pt 1):2141–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  287. 287.

    Andreini D, Pontone G, Bogaert J, et al. Long-term prognostic value of cardiac magnetic resonance in left ventricle noncompaction: a prospective multicenter study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;68(20):2166–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  288. 288.

    Perry R, Shah R, Saiedi M, et al. The role of cardiac imaging in the diagnosis and management of anderson-fabry disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(7 Pt 1):1230–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  289. 289.

    Nordin S, Kozor R, Medina-Menacho K, et al. Proposed stages of myocardial phenotype development in fabry disease. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2019;12(8 Pt 2):1673–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  290. 290.

    Sado DM, White SK, Piechnik SK, et al. Identification and assessment of Anderson-Fabry disease by cardiovascular magnetic resonance noncontrast myocardial T1 mapping. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013b;6(3):392–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  291. 291.

    Moon JC, Sachdev B, Elkington AG, et al. Gadolinium enhanced cardiovascular magnetic resonance in Anderson-Fabry disease. Evidence for a disease specific abnormality of the myocardial interstitium. Eur Heart J. 2003;24(23):2151–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  292. 292.

    Frustaci A, Verardo R, Grande C, et al. Immune-mediated myocarditis in fabry disease cardiomyopathy. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(17):e009052.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  293. 293.

    Writing G, Document reading G, for ERTdwrbmotESDC. A joint procedural position statement on imaging in cardiac sarcoidosis: from the Cardiovascular and Inflammation & Infection Committees of the European Association of Nuclear Medicine, the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging, and the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(10):1073–1089.

  294. 294.

    Kouranos V, Tzelepis GE, Rapti A, et al. Complementary role of CMR to conventional screening in the diagnosis and prognosis of cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(12):1437–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  295. 295.

    Puntmann VO, Isted A, Hinojar R, Foote L, Carr-White G, Nagel E. T1 and T2 mapping in recognition of early cardiac involvement in systemic sarcoidosis. Radiology. 2017;285(1):63–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  296. 296.

    Perry A, Vuitch F. Causes of death in patients with sarcoidosis. A morphologic study of 38 autopsies with clinicopathologic correlations. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1995;119(2):167–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  297. 297.

    Matsuki M, Matsuo M. MR findings of myocardial sarcoidosis. Clin Radiol. 2000;55(4):323–5.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  298. 298.

    Coleman GC, Shaw PW, Balfour PC Jr, et al. Prognostic value of myocardial scarring on CMR in patients with cardiac sarcoidosis. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;10(4):411–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  299. 299.

    Vignaux O, Dhote R, Duboc D, et al. Detection of myocardial involvement in patients with sarcoidosis applying T2-weighted, contrast-enhanced, and cine magnetic resonance imaging: initial results of a prospective study. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2002;26(5):762–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  300. 300.

    Ghadri JR, Wittstein IS, Prasad A, et al. International Expert Consensus Document on Takotsubo Syndrome (Part II): diagnostic workup, outcome, and management. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(22):2047–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  301. 301.

    Scally C, Abbas H, Ahearn T, et al. Myocardial and systemic inflammation in acute stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2019;139(13):1581–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  302. 302.

    Abdel-Aty H, Cocker M, Friedrich MG. Myocardial edema is a feature of Tako-Tsubo cardiomyopathy and is related to the severity of systolic dysfunction: insights from T2-weighted cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Int J Cardiol. 2009;132(2):291–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  303. 303.

    Eitel I, von Knobelsdorff-Brenkenhoff F, Bernhardt P, et al. Clinical characteristics and cardiovascular magnetic resonance findings in stress (takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. JAMA. 2011;306(3):277–86.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  304. 304.

    Scally C, Rudd A, Mezincescu A, et al. Persistent long-term structural, functional, and metabolic changes after stress-induced (Takotsubo) cardiomyopathy. Circulation. 2018;137(10):1039–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  305. 305.

    Cury RC, Abbara S, Sandoval LJ, Houser S, Brady TJ, Palacios IF. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Visualization of endomyocardial fibrosis by delayed-enhancement magnetic resonance imaging. Circulation. 2005;111(9):e115-117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  306. 306.

    Salemi VM, Rochitte CE, Shiozaki AA, et al. Late gadolinium enhancement magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis and prognosis of endomyocardial fibrosis patients. Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(3):304–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  307. 307.

    Alter P, Maisch B. Endomyocardial fibrosis in Churg-Strauss syndrome assessed by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Cardiol. 2006;108(1):112–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  308. 308.

    Sechtem U, Higgins CB, Sommerhoff BA, Lipton MJ, Huycke EC. Magnetic resonance imaging of restrictive cardiomyopathy. Am J Cardiol. 1987;59(5):480–2.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  309. 309.

    Muchtar E, Blauwet LA, Gertz MA. Restrictive cardiomyopathy: genetics, pathogenesis, clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and therapy. Circ Res. 2017;121(7):819–37.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  310. 310.

    Habib G, Bucciarelli-Ducci C, Caforio ALP, et al. Multimodality imaging in restrictive cardiomyopathies: an EACVI expert consensus document In collaboration with the “Working Group on myocardial and pericardial diseases” of the European Society of Cardiology Endorsed by The Indian Academy of Echocardiography. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(10):1090–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  311. 311.

    Pereira NL, Grogan M, Dec GW. Spectrum of restrictive and infiltrative cardiomyopathies: part 2 of a 2-part series. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018;71(10):1149–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  312. 312.

    Masui T, Finck S, Higgins CB. Constrictive pericarditis and restrictive cardiomyopathy: evaluation with MR imaging. Radiology. 1992;182(2):369–73.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  313. 313.

    Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M, Bogaert J. Real-time cine MRI of ventricular septal motion: a novel approach to assess ventricular coupling. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;21(3):305–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  314. 314.

    Klein AL, Abbara S, Agler DA, et al. American Society of Echocardiography clinical recommendations for multimodality cardiovascular imaging of patients with pericardial disease: endorsed by the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance and Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013;26(9):965–1012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  315. 315.

    Bogaert J, Francone M. Pericardial disease: value of CT and MR imaging. Radiology. 2013;267(2):340–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  316. 316.

    Bogaert J, Meyns B, Dymarkowski S, Sinnaeve P, Meuris B. Calcified constrictive pericarditis: prevalence, distribution patterns, and relationship to the myocardium. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2016;9(8):1013–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  317. 317.

    Francone M, Dymarkowski S, Kalantzi M, Rademakers FE, Bogaert J. Assessment of ventricular coupling with real-time cine MRI and its value to differentiate constrictive pericarditis from restrictive cardiomyopathy. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(4):944–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  318. 318.

    Thavendiranathan P, Verhaert D, Walls MC, et al. Simultaneous right and left heart real-time, free-breathing CMR flow quantification identifies constrictive physiology. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012;5(1):15–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  319. 319.

    Bogaert J, Cruz I, Voigt JU, Sinnaeve P, Imazio M. Value of pericardial effusion as imaging biomarker in acute pericarditis, do we need to focus on more appropriate ones? Int J Cardiol. 2015;191:284–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  320. 320.

    Imazio M, Pivetta E, Palacio Restrepo S, et al. Usefulness of cardiac magnetic resonance for recurrent pericarditis. Am J Cardiol. 2020;125(1):146–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  321. 321.

    Taylor AM, Dymarkowski S, Verbeken EK, Bogaert J. Detection of pericardial inflammation with late-enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance imaging: initial results. Eur Radiol. 2006;16(3):569–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  322. 322.

    Doulaptsis C, Goetschalckx K, Masci PG, Florian A, Janssens S, Bogaert J. Assessment of early post-infarction pericardial injury by CMR. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2013;6(3):411–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  323. 323.

    Garcia MJ. Constrictive pericarditis versus restrictive cardiomyopathy? J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67(17):2061–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  324. 324.

    Feng D, Glockner J, Kim K, et al. Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging pericardial late gadolinium enhancement and elevated inflammatory markers can predict the reversibility of constrictive pericarditis after antiinflammatory medical therapy: a pilot study. Circulation. 2011;124(17):1830–7.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  325. 325.

    Zurick AO, Bolen MA, Kwon DH, et al. Pericardial delayed hyperenhancement with CMR imaging in patients with constrictive pericarditis undergoing surgical pericardiectomy: a case series with histopathological correlation. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2011;4(11):1180–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  326. 326.

    Talreja DR, Edwards WD, Danielson GK, et al. Constrictive pericarditis in 26 patients with histologically normal pericardial thickness. Circulation. 2003;108(15):1852–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  327. 327.

    Moura-Ferreira S, Budts W, Bogaert J. Left pericardial congenital defect: the heart shows its moves at CMR. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017;18(11):1270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  328. 328.

    Basso C, Rizzo S, Valente M, Thiene G. Cardiac masses and tumours. Heart. 2016;102(15):1230–45.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  329. 329.

    Roberts WC. Primary and secondary neoplasms of the heart. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(5):671–82.

    CAS  Article  Google Scholar 

  330. 330.

    Beroukhim RS, Prakash A, Buechel ER, et al. Characterization of cardiac tumors in children by cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: a multicenter experience. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011;58(10):1044–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  331. 331.

    Ghadimi Mahani M, Lu JC, Rigsby CK, Krishnamurthy R, Dorfman AL, Agarwal PP. MRI of pediatric cardiac masses. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2014;202(5):971–981.

  332. 332.

    Delbeke D, Coleman RE, Guiberteau MJ, et al. Procedure guideline for tumor imaging with 18F-FDG PET/CT 1.0. J Nucl Med. 2006;47(5):885–95.

    Google Scholar 

  333. 333.

    Motwani M, Kidambi A, Herzog BA, Uddin A, Greenwood JP, Plein S. MR imaging of cardiac tumors and masses: a review of methods and clinical applications. Radiology. 2013;268(1):26–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  334. 334.

    Dawson D, Mohiaddin R. Assessment of pericardial diseases and cardiac masses with cardiovascular magnetic resonance. Prog Cardiovasc Dis. 2011;54(3):305–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  335. 335.

    Raj V, Alpendurada F, Christmas T, Moat NE, Mohiaddin RH. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in assessment of intracaval and intracardiac extension of renal cell carcinoma. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2012;144(4):845–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  336. 336.

    Page M, Grasso AE, Carpenter JP, Sheppard MN, Karwatowski SP, Mohiaddin RH. Primary cardiac lymphoma: diagnosis and the impact of chemotherapy on cardiac structure and function. Can J Cardiol. 2016;32(7):931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  337. 337.

    Deac MO, Sheppard MN, Moat N, Burke SJ, Christmas T, Mohiaddin RH. Images in cardiovascular medicine. From uterus to pulmonary embolus: an uncommon association. Circulation. 2009;120(3):e16-19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  338. 338.

    Hernando D, Kellman P, Haldar JP, Liang ZP. Robust water/fat separation in the presence of large field inhomogeneities using a graph cut algorithm. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(1):79–90.

    Google Scholar 

  339. 339.

    Deluigi CC, Meinhardt G, Ursulescu A, Klem I, Fritz P, Mahrholdt H. Images in cardiovascular medicine. Noninvasive characterization of left atrial mass. Circulation. 2006;113(2):19–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  340. 340.

    Mollet NR, Dymarkowski S, Volders W, et al. Visualization of ventricular thrombi with contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in patients with ischemic heart disease. Circulation. 2002;106(23):2873–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  341. 341.

    Weinsaft JW, Kim RJ, Ross M, et al. Contrast-enhanced anatomic imaging as compared to contrast-enhanced tissue characterization for detection of left ventricular thrombus. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2009;2(8):969–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  342. 342.

    Bogaert J, Dymarkowski S. Cardiac Masses. In: Clinical Cardiac MRI, editor. 2nd Edition. Berlin: Springer; 2012. p. 439–43.

    Google Scholar 

  343. 343.

    Saba SG, Bandettini PW, Shanbhag SM, Spottiswoode BS, Kellman P, Arai AE. Characterization of cardiac masses with T1 mapping. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2015;17(1):Q32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  344. 344.

    Antoch G, Bockisch A. Combined PET/MRI: a new dimension in whole-body oncology imaging? Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2009;36(Suppl 1):S113-120.