Skip to main content
Download PDF
Download ePub

Integrated head and neck imaging of symptomatic patients with stroke using simultaneous non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging as compared with digital subtraction angiography

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance volume 24, Article number: 19 (2022) Cite this article

Abstract

Background

Both stenosis rate and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) are important predictors of stroke risk. Simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) imaging can detect both stenosis rate and IPH. We aimed to evaluate consistency between SNAP and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) to assess symptomatic patients with stroke and explore the performance of SNAP to identify IPH and the clinical factors associated with IPH.

Methods

Eighty-one symptomatic patients with stroke, admitted to Wuhan Union Hospital who underwent CMR high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) and SNAP, were retrospectively identified. For patients who received interventional therapy, the imaging functions of SNAP and HR-VWI were compared with DSA. The diameters of the intracranial and carotid vessels were measured, and stenotic vessels were identified. The consistency of SNAP and HR-VWI in identifying IPH was also examined, and the correlations between IPH and clinical factors were analyzed.

Results

SNAP was more consistent with DSA than HR-VWI in measuring vascular stenosis (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]SNAP-DSA = 0.917, ICC HR-VWI-DSA = 0.878). Regarding the diameter measurements of each intracranial and carotid vessel segment, SNAP was superior or similar to HR-VWI, and both were consistent with DSA in the measurement of major intracranial vascular segments. HR-VWI and SNAP exhibited acceptable agreement in identifying IPH (Kappa = 0.839, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.704–0.974). Patients who underwent interventional therapy had a higher plaque burden (P < 0.001). Patients with IPH had lower levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) (P = 0.038) and higher levels of blood glucose (P = 0.007) and cystatin C (P = 0.040).

Conclusions

CMR SNAP is consistent with DSA in measuring vessel diameters and identifying atherosclerosis stenosis in each intracranial and carotid vessel segment. SNAP is also a potential alternative to HR-VWI in identifying stenosis and IPH.

Introduction

Intracranial and carotid atherosclerotic disease are the major causes of ischemic stroke worldwide, especially in Asia [1]. The risk assessment of ischemic stroke is based on the percentage of stenotic intracranial and carotid arteries, according to medical imaging findings [2, 3]. Digital subtraction angiography (DSA) is the gold standard for evaluating arterial stenoses. However, it has many disadvantages, including being invasive, costly, and complicated to perform. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI), which provides a non-invasive and clear visualization of vessel lumens and walls, has been used increasingly in the study of atherosclerotic plaques. HR-VWI has been reported to provide significant data for the diagnosis, clinical treatment, and prognosis of patients with stroke [4,5,6]. As a new CMR-based technique, simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging can show the presence of both lumen and intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) simultaneously with a wide field-of-view (FOV) that covers large vessels in both the head and the neck [7]. Recent studies have assessed the ability of HR-VWI and SNAP to characterize atherosclerotic plaque compositions, stenoses, and their association with ischemic stroke. The imaging functions of these modalities were also compared with those of conventional vascular imaging techniques [8,9,10,11,12]. Previous research suggested that SNAP was efficient at identifying IPH and had satisfactory agreement with histopathology [8]. Several current guidelines recommend HR-VWI as the most appropriate diagnostic method to assess intracranial and extracranial atherosclerotic plaques, especially vulnerable plaques [13], and SNAP is suggested as a complement to identify vulnerable plaque components, mainly for IPH [14]. Compared with SNAP, HR-VWI examinations including multi-sequence imaging, are more time-consuming. If the diagnostic performance of SNAP and HR-VWI is similar to DSA in measuring the stenosis severity, SNAP could replace HR-VWI in some clinical circumstances and might improve diagnostic efficacy.

A growing body of evidence suggests that the composition and burden of plaques are important for stroke assessment and prognosis [13, 15]. IPH, as a plaque component, is particularly important for the prediction of plaque progression [16]. Previous literature demonstrate that the early detection of IPH enables clinicians to determine whether patients can benefit from carotid endarterectomy or stenting, which could eventually improve the prognosis of patients with stroke [17]. Exploring IPH-associated clinical factors via routine clinical biochemical examinations may remind clinicians to pay attention to the existence of IPH before an imaging examination, leading to diagnostic efficacy improvements.

There are few studies comparing the performance of SNAP and DSA in assessing arterial stenosis in the head and neck vessels, as well as the association between IPH and clinical factors. The present study aimed to compare the performance of SNAP with DSA in measuring luminal stenosis of the head and neck arteries. It also explored the value of SNAP in identifying IPH and the clinical factors associated with IPH to provide an effective imaging basis for improving diagnostic and therapeutic efficacy.

Methods

Study population

Data from symptomatic patients with stroke, admitted to the Union Hospital Affiliated with Tongji Medical College of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Wuhan, China) from January 2019 to January 2020, were retrospectively analyzed (Fig. 1). The study was approved by the Medical Ethics Committee of Union Hospital affiliated with Tongji Medical School of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Approval No. 2021-IEC133). Written informed consent was waived.

Fig. 1
figure 1

Flow chart of the study design

Full size image

Inclusion criteria included: (1) symptomatic inpatients (18 to 80 years); (2) recent stroke (within the first two weeks after admission); (3) underwent both SNAP and HR-VWI, with or without interventional therapy (e.g., mechanical thrombectomy). Exclusion criteria were: (1) non-atherosclerotic causes of stroke, such as Moyamoya disease, vasculitis, and arterial dissection; (2) hemorrhagic stroke; (3) cerebral neoplasm; (4) cardiogenic stroke (e.g., atrial fibrillation, heart failure, or myocardial infarction); (5) poor-quality CMR images; (6) contraindications for gadolinium-based contrast agent administration.

Data collection

Clinical data were extracted from the patient’s electronic medical records, including age, sex, height, weight, body mass index (BMI), systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), and pulse pressure (PP). Traditional vascular risk factors, including hypertension, smoking, alcohol, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and levels of total protein, serum amyloid A (SAA), total cholesterol, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), and triglycerides were also obtained. All biochemical markers mentioned in our study were measured using routine biochemical tests within two weeks of admission.

Imaging examination

Patients underwent vessel wall imaging on a 3 T CMR system (Ingenia CX, Philips Healthcare, Best, the Netherlands) with a combination of a 32-channel head coil (Philips Healthcare) and an 8-channel neck coil (TSImaging Healthcare, Beijing, China). The imaging protocols are summarized as follows: 3-dimensional (3D) time-of-flight (3D-TOF), 3D SNAP in both transverse and coronal orientations, multi-sequence HR-VWI (e.g., coronal 3D T1-weighted variable flip angle fast spin-echo sequences [VISTA; Philip Healthcare] before and after contrast administration, and coronal T2-weighted (T2w) VISTA), T1-weighted inversion recovery (T1w-IR), T2-FLAIR-weighted (T2w-FLAIR), and diffusion-weighted-imaging (DWI). 3D-TOF, T1w, T2w-FLAIR, and DWI were used to identify symptomatic patients with stroke. 3D-TOF imaging was used to detect arterial stenosis. Moreover, the T1w imaging, T2w-FLAIR, and DWI were used to find infarcted intracranial lesions. We also used 3D SNAP, 3D T1-VISTA, and 3D T2-VISTA to assess both intracranial and extracranial arterial stenosis and plaque. The T1/T2-VISTA sequences were used to identify the atherosclerotic plaques and their compositions, and the contrast-enhanced T1-VISTA imaging to further determined the nature of the plaque and to measure the degree of stenosis.

The main imaging parameters were as follows: For 3D TOF CMR angiogram (CMRA): fast field echo (FFE) sequence, repetition time (TR)/echo time (TE) = 23/3.5 ms; flip angle (FA) = 18°; field of view (FOV) = 160 × 160 mm2; slices = 150; slice thickness = 0.55 mm; acquisition matrix size = 500 × 332; reconstruction voxel size = 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.55 mm3; parallel acquisition factor = 3; and scan time = 4 min and 15 s. For T1w imaging: turbo spin echo (TSE) sequence, TR/TE = 2000/16 ms; acquisition matrix size = 288 × 204; slice thickness = 5 mm. For T2w-FLAIR: TSE sequence, TR/TE = 9000/125 ms, acquisition matrix size = 384 × 192; slice thickness = 5 mm. For DWI: spin echo (SE) sequence, TR/TE = 2732/77 ms; acquisition matrix size = 152 × 106; FA = 90°; slices = 23; slice thickness = 5 mm. DWI was obtained with b values of 0 and 1000 s/mm2.

For T1w VISTA: TSE sequence, TR/TE = 600/26 ms; FA = 90°; acquisition matrix = 416 × 270; slice thickness = 0.6 mm; reconstruction voxel size = 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm3; compressed sensing factor = 3; scan time = 4 min and 52 s. For T2wVISTA: TSE sequence, TR/TE = 1800/214 ms; FA = 90°; acquisition matrix = 416 × 270; slice thickness = 0.6 mm; reconstruction voxel size = 0.6 × 0.6 × 0.6 mm3; compressed sensing factor = 3; and with SPAIR fat suppression, scan time = 4 min and 26 s. For SNAP: FFE sequence, TR/TE = 11/5.9 ms; FA = 11°; inversion time = 500 ms; FOV = 160 × 160 mm2; slices = 150, slice thickness = 0.8 mm; acquisition matrix size = 200 × 200; reconstruction voxel size = 0.4 × 0.4 × 0.4 mm3; parallel acquisition factor = 2; scan time = 3 min and 2 s.

Data analysis

Two radiologists (Y.J. and X.L., with 2 and 5 years of experience in neuro-vascular imaging, respectively) analyzed the imaging examinations results independently using Vessel Explorer 2.0 software (TS Imaging Healthcare, Beijing, China). Both were blinded to patients' clinical characteristics. HR-VWI and SNAP assessments were performed independently, and the interval between the two radiologists’ assessments was about one month. The results of HR-VWI/SNAP were also evaluated independently against the DSA results, and the evaluation interval between the HR-VWI/SNAP and DSA was also about one month. In addition, both radiologists also investigated the location and number of IPH on the SNAP images. The lumen, wall, and IPH components of SNAP and HR-VWI were manually delineated [18, 19].

Disagreements were resolved by discussion between the two radiologists. If an agreement could not be reached, a senior radiologist (J.W. with 12 years of neuro-radiology experience) would repeat the measurements and come to a consensus.

Multi-contrast vessel wall imaging of arteries of the head and neck arteries (T1w-VISTA, T2w-VISTA, and CE-T1w-VISTA) was reconstructed using the software to measure luminal stenosis via the North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) algorithm or the Warfarin-Aspirin Symptomatic Intracranial Disease Study (WASID) algorithm [20, 21]. The common carotid artery (CCA), internal carotid arteries (C1-7), M1 segment of middle cerebral arteries, V4 segment of vertebral arteries, and basilar artery on these sequences were analyzed. The degree of stenosis was defined as: (1) mild, < 50%; (2) moderate, 50–70%; and (3) severe, 70% ~ 99% [4]. The stenosis was defined as a decrease in the diameter of the lumen as a result of an eccentric or circumferential thickening of the vessel wall compared to the image slices obtained from beneath or above the focal wall, as identified on the SNAP or HR-VWI. Arterial stenotic rates were measured using DSA with the following equation: 1- the diameter of the narrowest part / (the mean of the normal diameter on both sides). Stenosis measurements on SNAP/HR-VWI were as follows: (1—minimum luminal diameter/normal reference diameter) × 100%. The IPH was defined as the presence of increased T1 signal intensity (> 150%) on the T1w-VISTA or SNAP sequence as compared with the adjacent grey matter or the sternocleidomastoid muscle [22]. Plaque burden = (1-lm/wall area) × 100% [23].

Statistical analysis

SPSS (version 22.0, Statistical Package for the Social Sciences, International Business Machines, Inc., Armonk, New York, USA) was used for statistical analyses. Continuous variables are presented as the mean ± standard deviation (SD), and categorical variables are presented as the frequency and percentage. For clinical factor analyses, an unequal number of patients with or without IPH was matched according to the age distribution and sex ratio of the two groups. The Chi-square and McNemar’s tests were used to assess associations between the presence of IPH and vascular risk factors. Nonparametric test was used to investigate the relationship between the presence of IPH and clinical data when the data were abnormally distributed. The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) and Bland–Altman plot with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to evaluate intraclass and intergroup reproducibility in diagnosing the degrees of stenosis. The Kappa value was used to evaluate the consistency between SNAP and HR-VWI in identifying IPH. Statistical significance was set at P < 0.05.

Results

Patient characteristics at baseline

Eighty-one symptomatic patients with stroke were identified (Table 1) (54.6 ± 9.5 years; 67 (82.7%) male). Among them, 35 patients underwent DSA-guided interventional therapy, who demonstrated a relatively higher plaque burden (P < 0.001) (vs. medication therapy). However, patients treated with different methods had no significant difference in other aspects, including age, sex, and complications (all P > 0.05) (Table 1). Patients with and without IPH were matched by age and sex. For the clinical factors, patients with IPH were not statistically different in age, height, systolic and DBP, and pulse pressure (Table 2). Patients with or without IPH also did not have significant differences in serum total protein, SAA, total cholesterol, LDL, triglycerides, and homocysteine concentrations (P > 0.05). The blood glucose (P = 0.007) and cystatin C (P = 0.04) concentrations were higher in IPH patients. In contrast, patients with IPH had lower HDL (P = 0.038). No significant differences in plaque burden (89.7 ± 9.6, P > 0.05), hypertension (n = 24 (77.4% vs. 54.8%), P = 0.06), or other comorbidities were found between patients with or without IPH.

Table 1 Comparison of patient data at baseline
Full size table
Table 2 Comparison of patient data with or without intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH)
Full size table

Performance of SNAP in identifying IPH

The location and number of IPH were counted in patients with IPH (Table 3). A total of 52 IPH lesions were identified in the intracranial arteries of 31 patients, and 26 IPH lesions were found in the carotid arteries. IPH was detected in both carotid and intracranial locations. Six of the 31 patients had IPH in both the neck and intracranial regions. Seventeen patients had multiple IPH lesions in intracranial or carotid arteries. A greater number of IPH lesions were detected in the major intracranial vessels than in the carotid artery. SNAP and HR-VWI had good consistency in identifying IPH (Table 4, Kappa = 0.839). In identifying IPH, SNAP had a similar consistency in identifying IPH in intracranial and carotid arteries (Additional file 1: Table S1). Four patients with IPH had mild stenosis (12.9%), 10 had moderate stenosis (32.3%) and 17 had severe stenosis (54.8%). There was no significant difference in the degree of stenosis between the patients with and without IPH. However, the proportion of patients with IPH increased with the degree of stenosis among the patients with different degrees of stenosis (4/13 [30.77%] mild vs. 10/21 [47.62%] moderate vs.17/28 [60.71%] severe).

Table 3 The location and number of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) lesions found on the simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) images
Full size table
Table 4 Agreement between simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging and high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) in identification of intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH)
Full size table

Comparison of the functions of SNAP and DSA in the measurement of luminal stenosis

Thirty five patients underwent both HR-VWI and DSA-guided interventional therapy, and 69 luminal stenosis sites and plaques were evaluated using both SNAP and DSA (Fig. 1–2). Consistency of the same reader at different times (ICCintraclass = 0.960) and between the two readers (ICCinterclass = 0.889) were satisfactory (Fig. 3 a & b). Moreover, SNAP (ICCSNAP-DSA = 0.917) and HR-VWI (ICCHR-VWI-DSA = 0.878) both showed good agreement with DSA the measurement of luminal stenosis (Fig. 4). Of the 69 stenotic segments detected by integrated head and neck imaging, 14 were in the carotid artery, and 55 were in the intracranial artery. We found that SNAP and HR-VWI had acceptable consistency with DSA according to each segment of artery stenosis (Fig. 5). Then, we evaluated SNAP, HR-VWI and DSA in each segment of the intracranial and carotid arteries, including normal and abnormal segments, and found that SNAP and HR-VWI had satisfactory consistency with DSA in each segment (Additional file 1: Fig. S1). SNAP was superior or similar to HR-VWI and was consistent with DSA in the major intracranial vascular segments.

Fig. 2
figure 2

Images from typical simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging and high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) in symptomatic patients with stroke. Images a, b represent the SNAP and T1-VISTA images of a 43-years-old man with acute stroke. Eccentric plaques (narrow yellow arrow) were observed at the beginning of the C1 segment of the left internal carotid artery (ICA) of this patient. Images c, d show the corresponding coronal SNAP and digital subtraction angiography (DSA) images. Images e, f images are the SNAP and T1-VISTA images from a 50-years-old man with subacute stroke and with IPH plaques in the right side (images e.1 and f.1) and the left side (images e.2 and f.2) of the middle carotid artery (MCA; wide yellow arrow). The blue dots and lines indicate vessel walls. The red dots and lines represent vessel lumens. The yellow dots and lines indicate the presence of IPH

Full size image
Fig. 3
figure 3

The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values examined the same reader at different times and between the two readers. a Good consistency was found for the assessments by the same reader at different times(ICCintraclass = 0.960). b Better consistency was found between the two reader assessments in measuring the degree of stenosis (ICCinterclass = 0.889)

Full size image
Fig. 4
figure 4

Simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) typically have a better consistency than HR-VWI with DSA. a ICCSNAP-DSA = 0.917, b ICCHR-VWI-DSA = 0.878, c, d Bland–Altman plots comparing SNAP and DSA vs. HR-VWI and DSA

Full size image
Fig. 5
figure 5

Bland–Altman plots comparing the bias of simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) and high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) images in measuring different stenotic segments of intracranial and carotid arteries using DSA images as the reference images. (ICA internal carotid artery, MCA middle cerebral artery, BA basilar artery, VA vertebral artery)

Full size image

Discussion

Although the primary indicator of ischemic stroke risk is the rate of stenosis, plaque components are becoming increasingly recognized as important in assessing stroke risk, as shown in the current study. IPH is an important risk factor for stroke compared with other plaque components [24]. IPH is common in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with stroke, while symptomatic patients are at a greater risk for IPH than asymptomatic patients [25]. In the present study, we studied the symptomatic patients with stroke and investigated whether SNAP and HR-VWI were well-aligned with DSA for measuring the stenosis and diameter of both intracranial and carotid arteries. We also studied if SNAP was similar to HR-VWI in being able to detect IPH. The results showed that SNAP was more consistent with DSA at measuring luminal stenosis than HR-VWI. When measuring general segments, SNAP was also better than or similar to HR-VWI in the measurement of intracranial vascular segments. Additionally, SNAP had good inter-group consistency for the intracranial and carotid arteries and a good consistency with HR-VWI in identifying IPH. Based on these results, we analyzed IPH-related clinical factors. The main clinical factors associated with IPH were HDL, glucose, and cystatin C.

SNAP performance in detecting luminal stenosis has been studied previously [8,9,10,11,12]. Wang et al. reported that SNAP had a good agreement with time-of-flight (TOF)-CMR angiography (TOF-CMRA) in measuring carotid artery lumens [8]. Shu et al. showed that, compared with CE-CMRA, SNAP was equally capable of measuring the carotid artery stenosis [9]. Several scholars have also suggested that SNAP had good consistency with TOF-MRA, magnetization prepared-rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE), and histology in characterizing plaque components, especially for IPH detection [10, 11]. SNAP was also shown to be consistent with HR-VWI in characterizing large intracranial vessels [12], while HR-VWI was found to have acceptable agreement with DSA in measuring the diameter of each carotid artery segment [7]. However, few studies have concentrated on the integrated imaging of intracranial and carotid vessel walls [26, 27], and no study has comprehensively assessed the imaging performance of SNAP and DSA on head and neck vascular walls. Our results showed that SNAP and HR-VWI were consistent with DSA in each intracranial and carotid vessel segment, and the results were reproducible and repeatable. SNAP is a non-contrast-enhanced integrated head and neck imaging technique that can be used for a wider range of individuals than conventional high-resolution imaging and DSA, the gold standard imaging technique, especially for contrast-sensitive patients and critically ill patients with poor liver and kidney functions.

To the best of our knowledge, CMR can evaluate IPH easier and faster than other plaque components. CMR is also more amenable to in-clinic evaluation. SNAP and HR-VWI were all found to be in good agreement with pathologic findings in the identifying IPH in the previous literatures [11, 28]. In the current study, we found that SNAP and HR-VWI had good consistency in the identifying of IPH, and no significant difference in the number of IPH and non-IPH patients among those with different degrees of stenosis, which could be related to the relatively small sample size or a potentially complicated relationship between stenosis and various plaque components [29, 30]. Additionally, mild stenosis might be partly caused by plaque remodeling [31]. Therefore, the number of IPH lesions was observed to increase as the degree of stenosis increased; however, no significant correlation was found between stenosis and the presence of IPH lesions, indicating the study of plaque remodeling is needed. But, overall, we found that as the degree of stenosis increased, the presence of IPH also increased. Our study included the assessment of both carotid and intracranial arteries, and we came to a similar conclusion as those of a previous study [32]. That study demonstrated an increase in the degree of carotid artery stenosis independently associated with the presence of IPH. IPH was detected in both carotid and intracranial vessels. Moreover, IPH was detected in the major intracranial vessels more often than in the carotid artery. Therefore, the integration of head and neck imaging can help detect and localize more IPH lesions, which is helpful for diagnosing etiologies, giving treatment guidance, and providing prognostic evaluations for symptomatic patients with stroke. SNAP is a one-stop solution for measuring narrowness and identifying IPH and has a shorter scan time than HR-VWI. However, it is worth noting that the bright signal in the T1w intracranial artery images in our study was defined as IPH with no histological evidence provided, which is a limitation of the study. On the other hand, this image interpretation is similar to previous radiological studies on intracranial IPH [33, 34] and has been supported by some specimen studies [28].

A previous study found that IPH in carotid plaques using MPRAGE imaging was associated with age, sex, degree of stenosis, and hyperlipidemia [35], which was, not observed in our study. This may be related to the cohort characteristics where patients with primarily moderate to severe arterial stenosis were included; some also had partial occlusions. In addition, rather than considering carotid plaques, we included all intracranial and carotid arterial plaques that could have influenced the analytic results, owing to the high incidence of intracranial plaques in Chinese patients and the high incidence of extracranial plaques in European and American patients [36]. A comprehensive assessment of the presence of plaques enables us to identify the etiology of stroke better.

The specific relationship between cystatin C and IPH has not been previously reported. Cystatin C is an inhibitor of elastase that can affect the extracellular matrix remodeling of atherogenesis. Although cystatin C levels could also indicate renal dysfunction, a number of scholars have reported the association of higher cystatin C levels,with an increased risk of cardiovascular-related death [37], a higher degree of intracranial and extracranial artery stenosis, and the presence of vulnerable plaques in patients with acute ischemic stroke [38, 39]. Increased serum cystatin C levels have also been shown to be associated with subclinical atherosclerosis and recurrent stroke [40, 41]. Therefore, increased serum cystatin C levels could be related to the progression of arteriosclerosis plaque. In the present study, we showed that patients with IPH also tended to have significantly higher serum cystatin C levels than those without IPH. But our study had a small sample size, we still need further research in the future.

Diabetes is known to play an important role in stroke. The Rotterdam Study showed that IPH is associated with increased serum insulin levels but not with increased glucose levels [42]. Previous studies have also found that diabetes was highly associated with lipid-rich necrotic cores (LRNC) of plaques and that the volume ratio of LRNC > 22.0% in carotid plaques could be an independent risk factor for acute cerebral infarction [43]. In our study, although the glucose levels were significantly different between the IPH and non-IPH groups, diabetes was not found to be significantly associated with IPH. We speculate that the varying glucose levels were a result of the varying serum insulin levels.

Hypertension is an important risk factor for clinical cardiovascular events. A study [44] on carotid arteries found that increases in both systolic and diasotlic blood pressure were associated with a range of plaque components, including IPH. Hypertension also affected vessel wall volume and fibrous cap. Hypertension may contribute to fibrous cap rupture and IPH, but we did not observe a similar result, perhaps due to the small sample size. Low diastolic blood pressure has been found to be associated with IPH in patients with asymptomatic atherosclerosis [45]; however, the underlying mechanism needs further study in the future.

Limitations

This study has several limitations. First, our study had a small sample size and was a single-center study. Second, there might have been some bias in our population selection, which primarily selected for symptomatic patients with moderate to severe stroke. Third, we did not have histopathologic results of plaque as the gold standard to identify IPH, especially in the intracranial arteries. Finally, a small percentage of the clinical data were missing due to the retrospective nature of this study; we attempted to decrease the influence of missing data on the conclusions as much as possible. Therefore, the conclusions should be considered carefully when generalizing the findings.

Conclusion

Among patients with recent symptomatic stroke, CMR SNAP is consistent with DSA in measuring the diameter of each intracranial and carotid arterial segment and stenotic atherosclerotic lesions. SNAP was also demonstrated a potential alternative to HR-VWI in identifying stenosis and IPH.

Availability of data and materials

The datasets used or analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding authors on reasonable request.

Abbreviations

3D:

Three dimensional

BMI:

Body mass index

CCA:

Common carotid artery

CMR:

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

CMRA:

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography

DBP:

Diastolic blood pressure

DSA:

Digital subtraction angiography

DWI:

Diffusion weighted imaing

FFE:

Fast field echo

FOV:

Field-of-view

HDL:

High-density lipoprotein

HR-VWI:

High resolution vessel wall imaging

ICA:

Internal carotid artery 

IPH:

Intraplaque hemorrhage

LDL:

Low density lipoprotein

LRNC:

Lipid rich necrotic core

MPRAGE:

Magnetization prepared-rapid gradient echo

NASCET:

North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial

PP:

Pulse pressure

SAA:

Serum amyloid A

SBP:

Systolic blood pressure

SNAP:

Simultaneous non-contrast angioraphy and intraplaque hamorrhage

TI:

Inversion time

TOF:

Time-of-flight

TP:

Total protein

TSE:

Turbo spin echo

References

  1. Herrington W, Lacey B, Sherliker P, Armitage J, Lewington S. Epidemiology of atherosclerosis and the potential to reduce the global burden of atherothrombotic disease. Circ Res. 2016;118(4):535–46.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Qian Y, Pu Y, Liu L, Wang D, Zhao X, Wang C, et al. Low HDL-C level is associated with the development of intracranial artery stenosis: analysis from the Chinese intracranial atherosclerosis (CICAS) study. PLoS ONE. 2013;8(5):e64395.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Kleindorfer DO, Towfighi A, Chaturvedi S, Cockroft KM, Gutierrez J, Lombardi-Hill D, et al. 2021 guideline for the prevention of stroke in patients with stroke and transient ischemic attack: a guideline from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2021;52(7):e364–467.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Wang Z, Lu M, Liu W, Zheng T, Li D, Yu W, et al. Assessment of carotid atherosclerotic disease using three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance vessel wall imaging: comparison with digital subtraction angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2020;22(1):18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Yu Y, Liu M, Villablanca JP, Li M, Xu Y, Gao S, et al. Middle cerebral artery plaque hyperintensity on T2-weighted vessel wall imaging is associated with ischemic stroke. Am J Neuroradiol. 2019;40(11):1886–92.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Baradaran H, Patel P, Gialdini G, Al-Dasuqi K, Giambrone A, Kamel H, et al. Quantifying intracranial internal carotid artery stenosis on MR angiography. Am J Neuroradiol. 2017;38(5):986–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen S, Zhao H, Li J, Zhou Z, Li R, Balu N, et al. Evaluation of carotid atherosclerotic plaque surface characteristics utilizing simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) technique. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2018;47:634–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wang J, Börnert P, Zhao H, Hippe DS, Zhao X, Balu N, et al. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraPlaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging for carotid atherosclerotic disease evaluation. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69(2):337–45.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shu H, Sun J, Hatsukami TS, Balu N, Hippe DS, Liu H, et al. Simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging: comparison with contrast-enhanced MR angiography for measuring carotid stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017;46(4):1045–52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen S, Ning J, Zhao X, Wang J, Zhou Z, Yuan C, et al. Fast simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (fSNAP) sequence for carotid artery imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2017;77(2):753–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li D, Qiao H, Han Y, Han H, Yang D, Cao J, et al. Histological validation of simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging (SNAP) for characterizing carotid intraplaque hemorrhage. Eur Radiol. 2021;31(5):3106–15.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Li D, Dai W, Cai Y, Han Y, Yao G, Chen H, et al. Atherosclerosis in stroke-related vascular beds and stroke risk: a 3-D MR vessel wall imaging study. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2018;5(12):1599–610.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Lindenholz A, van der Kolk AG, Zwanenburg JJM, Hendrikse J. The use and pitfalls of intracranial vessel wall imaging: How We Do It. Radiology. 2018;286(1):12–28.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Division of Radiology Chinese Medical Association. Chinese expert consensus on the technique and application of intracranial vascular wall imaging. Chin J Radiol. 2019;53(12):1045–59.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Ran Y, Wang Y, Zhu M, Wu X, Malhotra A, Lei X, et al. Higher plaque burden of middle cerebral artery is associated with recurrent ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2020;51(2):659–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Michel JB, Virmani R, Arbustini E, Pasterkamp G. Intraplaque hemorrhages as the trigger of plaque vulnerability. Eur Heart J. 2011;32(16):1977–85.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Luca S, Tobias S, Rolf J, Chun Y, Thomas SH, David S, et al. Imaging biomarkers of vulnerable carotid plaques for stroke risk prediction and their potential clinical implications. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(6):559–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Zhang Q, Qiao H, Dou J, Sui B, Zhao X, Chen Z, et al. Plaque components segmentation in carotid artery on simultaneous noncontrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging using machine learning. Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;60:93–100.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu J, Sun J, Niranjan B, Marina SF, Wang J, William SK, et al. Semiautomatic carotid intraplaque hemorrhage volume measurement using 3D carotid MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2019;50(4):1055–62.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  20. North American symptomatic carotid endarterectomy trial. Methods, patient characteristics, and progress. Stroke. 1991;22(6):711–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chimowitz MI, Lynn MJ, Howlett-Smith H, Stern BJ, Hertzberg VS, Frankel MR, et al. Comparison of warfarin and aspirin for symptomatic intracranial arterial stenosis. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:1305–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. van Dijk AC, Truijman MTB, Hussain B, Zadi T, Saiedie G, de Rotte AA, et al. Intraplaque hemorrhage and the plaque surface in carotid atherosclerosis: the plaque at risk study (PARISK). Am J Neuroradiol. 2015;36(11):2127–33.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Hoshino T, Sissani L, Labreuche J, Ducrocq G, Lavallée PC, Meseguer E, et al. Prevalence of systemic atherosclerosis burdens and overlapping stroke etiologies and their associations with long-term vascular prognosis in stroke with intracranial atherosclerotic disease. JAMA Neurol. 2018;75:203.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Alkhalil M, Choudhury RP. Intraplaque hemorrhage as a marker of stroke risk. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(2):407–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Schindler A, Schinner R, Altaf N, Hosseini AA, Simpson R, et al. Prediction of stroke risk by detection of hemorrhage in carotid plaques: meta-analysis of individual patient data. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2020;13(2):395–406.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Wang Z, Yu W, Fan Z, Liu W, Lu M, Zheng T. Diagnostic value of joint head and neck vessel wall imaging technique for internal carotid artery occlusion diseases: comparison with DSA. J Med Imaging. 2019;29(11):1817–22.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Shen M, Gao P, Du K, Chen S. Scan-rescan reproducibility of 3D joint intra- and extra-cranial vessel wall magnetic resonance imaging for atherosclerosis evaluation. Med Equip China. 2018;33(9):32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yang W, Wu K, Chen X. Intracranial atherosclerosis: from microscopy to high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. J Stroke. 2017;19(3):249–60.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  29. Kwee RM, Oostenbrugge RJ, Prins MH, Berg JWM, Franke CL, et al. Symptomatic patients with mild and moderate carotid stenosis. Stroke. 2010;41(7):1389–93.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Zhu C, Tian X, Degnan AJ, Shi Z, Zhang X, et al. Clinical significance of intraplaque hemorrhage in low- and high-grade basilar artery stenosis on high-resolution MRI. Am J Neuroradiol. 2018;39(7):1286–92.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang D, Chen Y, Chen H, Zhang W, Sun J, et al. A high-resolution MRI study of relationship between remodeling patterns and ischemic stroke in patients with atherosclerotic middle cerebral artery stenosis. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017;9:140.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Larson AS, Brinjikji W, Savastano L, Rabinstein AA, Saba L, et al. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage and stenosis: at what stage of plaque progression does intraplaque hemorrhage occur, and when is it most likely to be associated with symptoms? Am J Neuroradiol. 2021;42(7):1285–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Xu W, Li M, Gao S, Ni J, Yao M, Zhou L, et al. Middle cerebral artery intraplaque hemorrhage: prevalence and clinical relevance. Ann Neurol. 2012;71(2):195–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Yu J, Kwak H, Chung G, Hwang S, Park M, Park S. Association of intraplaque hemorrhage and acute infarction in patients with basilar artery plaque. Stroke. 2015;46(10):2768–72.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Larson AS, Brinjikji W, Savastano LE, Iii JH, Benson JC. Carotid intraplaque hemorrhage is associated with cardiovascular risk factors. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2020;49(4):355–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Xu Y, Yuan C, Zhou Z, He L, Mi D, Li R, et al. Co-existing intracranial and extracranial carotid artery atherosclerotic plaques and recurrent stroke risk: a three-dimensional multicontrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance study. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016;18(1):90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Helmersson-Karlqvist J, Ärnlöv J, Carlsson AC, Härmä J, Larsson A. Increased urinary cystatin C indicated higher risk of cardiovascular death in a community cohort. Atherosclerosis. 2014;234(1):108–13.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Umemura T, Kawamura T, Mashita S, Kameyama T, Sobue G. Higher levels of cystatin C are associated with extracranial carotid artery steno-occlusive disease in patients with noncardioembolic ischemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2017;6(1):1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Ren J, Dong X, Nao J. Serum cystatin C is associated with carotid atherosclerosis in patients with acute ischemic stroke. Neurol Sci. 2020;41:2793–800.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Chung Y, Lee Y, Kim K, Cho R, Chung S, Moon J. Serum cystatin C is associated with subclinical atherosclerosis in patients with type 2 diabetes: a retrospective study. Diab Vasc Dis Res. 2018;15(1):24–30.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Dong X, Nao J. Cystatin C as an index of acute cerebral infraction recurrence: one year follow-up study. Int J Neurosci. 2019;129(1):36–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Mujaj B, Bos D, Kavousi M, van der Lugt A, Staessen JA, Franco OH, et al. Serum insulin levels are associated with vulnerable plaque components in the carotid artery: the Rotterdam Study. Eur J Endocrinol. 2020;182(3):343–50.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun B, Li X, Liu X, Ge X, Lu Q, Zhao X, et al. Association between carotid plaque characteristics and acute cerebral infarction determined by MRI in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus. Cardiovasc Diabetol. 2017;16(1):111.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  44. Porcu M, Mannelli L, Melis M, Suri JS, Gerosa C, Cerrone G, et al. Carotid plaque imaging profiling in subjects with risk factors (diabetes and hypertension). Cardiovasc Diagn Ther. 2020;10(4):1005–18.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  45. Sun J, Canton G, Balu N, Hippe DS, Xu D, et al. Blood pressure is a major modifiable risk factor implicated in pathogenesis of intraplaque hemorrhage. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2016;36(4):743–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Professor Jie Zheng (Washington University in St. Louis) for his advice on the preparation of this manuscript and Professor Jing Wu (School of Public Health, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) for her guidance on the statistical analysis of this manuscript, and Dr. Peng Sun and Dr. Xiaoxiao Zhang (Philips Healthcare) for their guidance on the revision of this manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province of China (No. 2021CFB447, No. 2021CFB442).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Yuxi Jia and Xiaoming Liu contributed equally to this work

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Radiology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

    Yuxi Jia, Xiaoming Liu, Lan Zhang, Xiangchuang Kong, Shenglei Shu, Jia Liu, Xiaona Fu, Dingxi Liu, Jing Wang & Heshui Shi

  2. Hubei Province Key Laboratory of Molecular Imaging, Wuhan, 430022, China

    Yuxi Jia, Xiaoming Liu, Lan Zhang, Xiangchuang Kong, Shenglei Shu, Jia Liu, Xiaona Fu, Dingxi Liu, Jing Wang & Heshui Shi

  3. Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Tsinghua University School of Medicine, Haidian District, Beijing, China

    Shuo Chen

  4. Department of Neurology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, Hubei, China

    Lei Zhang

  5. Clinical & Technical Solutions, Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China

    Jiazheng Wang

Authors
  1. Yuxi Jia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Xiaoming Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lan Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xiangchuang Kong
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Shuo Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Lei Zhang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Jiazheng Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Shenglei Shu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Jia Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Xiaona Fu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Dingxi Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Jing Wang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  13. Heshui Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

YJ and XL analyzed and interpreted the clinical data and imaging data, and they were major contributors to writing the manuscript; LZ, XK and LZ participated in the collection of patient imaging and clinical data; SC provided and guided the use of the software for the imaging data analysis; JW, SS and JL contributed greatly in editing the manuscript. XF participated in the literature review, and DL provided some guidance for data collection. HS and JW contributed to the conceptualization of the study; All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Jing Wang or Heshui Shi.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This study was approved by ethical committee of Union Hospital, affiliated with Tongji Medical School of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Approval No. 2021-IEC133). Written informed consent was waived due to the retrospective nature of the study.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Additional file 1.

Table S1. The inter-group consistency of the simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) imaging in identifying intraplaque hemorrhage (IPH) at different sites of intracranial and carotid arteries. Fig. S1 The agreement between simultaneous non-contrast angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage (SNAP) and high-resolution vessel wall imaging (HR-VWI) with digital subtraction angiography (DSA) in measuring the diameter of different intracranial and carotid arterial segments.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jia, Y., Liu, X., Zhang, L. et al. Integrated head and neck imaging of symptomatic patients with stroke using simultaneous non-contrast cardiovascular magnetic resonance angiography and intraplaque hemorrhage imaging as compared with digital subtraction angiography. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 24, 19 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00849-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12968-022-00849-1

Keywords

Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance

ISSN: 1532-429X

Contact us