Skip to content

Advertisement

  • Meeting abstract
  • Open Access

209 MRI cardiac catheter assessment of total and differential pulmonary vascular resistance in the context of single ventricle physiology

  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1,
  • 1 and
  • 1
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance200810 (Suppl 1) :A70

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-10-S1-A70

  • Published:

Keywords

  • Multiple Source
  • Pulmonary Vascular Resistance
  • Pulmonary Blood Flow
  • Vascular Anatomy
  • Cyanotic Heart Disease

Introduction

In patients with complex cyanotic heart disease, pulmonary blood flow may be derived from more than one source, making assessment of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) difficult by conventional methods. Phase contrast MRI (PC-MRI) combined with invasive cardiac catheterization enables accurate measurement of the PVR. We demonstrate the application of MRI catheter in this patient group.

Hypothesis

MRI Cardiac catheter can assess the PVR in these patients, including those with multiple sources of pulmonary blood flow.

Methods

MRI cardiac catheterisation was performed in a combined XMR suite with a Philips 1.5 T Intera Achieva MR scanner and a single plane cardiac X-Ray unit. All patients underwent MRI cardiac catheter under general anaesthesia and were ventilated to normocarbia. Simultaneous pressure measurements were obtained with PC-MRI according to the vascular anatomy. Differential pulmonary blood flow was measured distal to all sources of blood flow. For those patients with multiple sources of blood flow, PVR was calculated by the equation: 1/PVRtotal = 1/PVRleft + 1/PVRright. Data is expressed as mean (± standard deviation), means are compared with a 2-tailed t-test.

Results

Twenty MRI cardiac catheters were performed in 18 patients with complex cyanotic disease, median age 3.63 years (0.5 to 41.7). For all patients, the mean PVR was 2.95 WU.m2 (± 1.41). Differential PVR was measured in 11 patients, the mean PVRright was 6.70 (± 2.01) WU.m2 and was significantly elevated compared to the mean PVRleft of 3.49 (± 1.12) WU.m2 (p = 0.002). Seven of these patients had multiple sources of pulmonary blood flow (Table 1). Seventeen patients were being investigated for suitability for progression to the next stage of cavo-pulmonary connection, 11 patients were suitable and 6 were unsuitable. The mean PVR or those suitable was 2.35 WU.m2 (± 0.58) compared to 4.54 WU.m2 (± 1.57), p = 0.017, for those who were unsuitable for further cavo-pulmonary palliation. The remaining three patients underwent assessment for complications related to the fontan circuit, the mean PVR was 2.14 in this group.
Table 1

Patients with multiple sources of pulmonary blood flow. MRI Cardiac Catheter allows for the measurement of pulmonary vascular resistance in patients with complex congenital heart disease. Differential pulmonary vascular resistance can be measured when there are multiple sources of pulmonary blood flow.

 

Age (years)

Diagnosis

Procedures

Sources of pulmonary blood flow

PVR (WU.m2)

Outcome

     

Right

Left

Total

 

1

3.1

Right atrial isomerism Complete atrioventricular septal defect Double outlet right ventricle Recurrent chylothoraces

TCPC

SVC and IVC

4.4

3.6

2.0

Conservative management of chylothoarces

2

3.0

Hypoplastic Left Heart Syndrome Recurrent ascites

TCPC

SVC and IVC

6.8

5.0

2.9

Recreation of atrial fenestration

3

12.5

Double inlet left ventricle Transposition Great Arteries Hypoplastic right ventricle

SCPC

SVC MPA

3.3

4.3

1.9

Proceed to TCPC

4

11.5

Right atrial isomerism Atrioventricular Septal Defect Pulmonary atresia Protein losing enteropathy

TCPC

SVC and IVC

9.3

1.9

1.6

Medical treatment of protein losing enteropathy

5

13.7

Mitral valve dysplasia Hypoplastic left ventricle Double outlet right ventricle

PA Band

MPA Right MBTS

6.9

2.7

1.9

Proceed to SCPC

6

1.47

Pulmonary atresia intact ventricular septum

Pulmonary valvotomy and ductal stent

MPA Arterial duct

6.0

3.3

2.1

Proceed to SCPC

7

41.7

Situs inversus Double inlet left ventricle Atrioventricular septal defect Pulmonary stenosis

Right MBTS Pulmonary valvotomy

MPA Right MBTS

5.5

3.2

2.0

Suitable for SCPC, patient elected for conservative management

Abbreviations: TCPC – Total cavo-pulmonary connection, SVC – superior vena cava, IVC – inferior vena cava, MPA – Main Pulmonary Artery, SCPC – Superior cavo-pulmonary connection, MBTS – Modified Blalock Taussig shunt.

Conclusion

In patients with a single ventricle physiology, the PVR needs to be low in order to proceed with palliation by means of a cavo-pulmonary connection. This can be determined by MRI cardiac catheter. Additionally, this technique offers the advantage of being able to measure the differential pulmonary vascular resistance, even in the context of multiple sources of pulmonary blood flow. We have found a difference in the mean PVR between the right and left lungs, which merits further investigation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Kings Collge London, London, UK

Copyright

© Bell et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2008

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd.

Advertisement