- Poster presentation
- Open Access
Myocardial ASL-CMR perfusion imaging with improved sensitivity using GRAPPA
https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-18-S1-P100
© Jao et al. 2016
- Published: 27 January 2016
Keywords
- Myocardial Blood Flow
- Arterial Spin Label
- Left Ventricular Myocardium
- Imaging Window
- Short Image Acquisition Time
Background
Myocardial arterial spin labeling (ASL) is a non-contrast CMR technique for measuring myocardial blood flow (MBF), but has relatively low signal-to-physiological noise (PN). Therefore perfusion measurements are made over several averaged pixels within left ventricular (LV) segments and not individual pixels. Shorter image acquisition times using SENSE parallel imaging has been shown to significantly reduce PN and improve sensitivity to MBF. However, SENSE is unable to reconstruct images at a field of view (FOV) smaller than the object being imaged and requires a large FOV, which leads to fewer number of pixels for averaging in the LV.1 In this study, we demonstrate that GRAPPA parallel imaging (rate 1.6), which has no such FOV restrictions, reduces PN even further than SENSE (rate 2), despite having a longer image acquisition window.
Methods
Six healthy volunteers were scanned using a 3T GE Signa Excite HD scanner with an 8-channel cardiac coil. Myocardial ASL measurements were made at a single mid short axis slice using flow alternating inversion recovery (FAIR) ASL and snap shot balanced SSFP imaging. Images were accelerated using either SENSE with a reduction factor of 2 (96 × 48) or GRAPPA with a reduction factor of 1.6 (96 × 60, 24 ACS lines). This corresponded to 153 ms and 192 ms imaging windows respectively. The minimum FOV that caused no aliasing was chosen for SENSE imaging while the minimum FOV that causes no aliasing within the left ventricular myocardium was chosen for GRAPPA imaging1. 6 breath-held labeled/control image pairs were acquired for each image acceleration scheme. MBF, PN, and temporal SNR (TSNR = MBF/PN) were measured within the left ventricular myocardium ROI.
Results
Comparison between GRAPPA and SENSE accelerated cardiac ASL
Global | Per-segment | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FOV (cm) | MBF (ml/g/min) | PN (ml/g/min) | TSNR | N | MBF (ml/g/min) | PN (ml/g/min) | TSNR | N | |
GRAPPA | 20.1 ± 2.8 | 1.73 ± 0.22 | 0.21 ± 0.10 | 11.48 ± 8.85 | 532.0 ± 132.7 | 1.97 ± 0.85 | 0.44 ± 0.22 | 5.44 ± 3.04 | 133.6 ± 35.7 |
SENSE | 26.6 ± 3.1 | 1.75 ± 0.85 | 0.60 ± 0.34 | 3.41 ± 1.38 | 269.6 ± 43.2 | 1.78 ± 1.04 | 0.73 ± 0.55 | 3.26 ± 3.15 | 67.6 ± 13.5 |
p-value | 0.0003 | 0.9681 | 0.0289 | 0.0086 | 0.0061 | 0.3230 | 0.0011 | 0.0013 | 2.6 × 10-12 |
Conclusions
We demonstrate that GRAPPA parallel imaging has lower PN and higher TSNR than SENSE parallel imaging while having similar estimated MBF, despite having a longer imaging window. This is because GRAPPA is able to image at a lower FOV, which increases the number of pixel for averaging and decreases partial voluming of the blood pool at the myocardial borders. Further reductions to PN are expected by reducing the imaging window by combining GRAPPA with partial Fourier reconstruction or with faster imaging acquisition schemes such as EPI.
Authors’ Affiliations
Copyright
This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
