Open Access

Cardiac steatosis and left ventricular function in men with metabolic syndrome

  • Kristofer Nyman4,
  • Marit Granér2,
  • Markku O Pentikäinen2,
  • Jesper Lundbom4,
  • Antti Hakkarainen4,
  • Reijo Sirén3,
  • Markku S Nieminen2,
  • Marja-Riitta Taskinen2,
  • Nina Lundbom4 and
  • Kirsi Lauerma1Email author
Journal of Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance201315:103

https://doi.org/10.1186/1532-429X-15-103

Received: 22 May 2013

Accepted: 5 November 2013

Published: 14 November 2013

Abstract

Background

Ectopic accumulation of fat accompanies visceral obesity with detrimental effects. Lipid oversupply to cardiomyocytes leads to cardiac steatosis, and in animal studies lipotoxicity has been associated with impaired left ventricular (LV) function. In humans, studies have yielded inconclusive results. The aim of the study was to evaluate the role of epicardial, pericardial and myocardial fat depots on LV structure and function in male subjects with metabolic syndrome (MetS).

Methods

A study population of 37 men with MetS and 38 men without MetS underwent cardiovascular magnetic resonance and proton magnetic spectroscopy at 1.5 T to assess LV function, epicardial and pericardial fat area and myocardial triglyceride (TG) content.

Results

All three fat deposits were greater in the MetS than in the control group (p <0.001). LV diastolic dysfunction was associated with MetS as measured by absolute (471 mL/s vs. 667 mL/s, p = 0.002) and normalized (3.37 s-1 vs. 3.75 s-1, p = 0.02) LV early diastolic peak filling rate and the ratio of early diastole (68% vs. 78%, p = 0.001). The amount of epicardial and pericardial fat correlated inversely with LV diastolic function. However, myocardial TG content was not independently associated with LV diastolic dysfunction.

Conclusions

In MetS, accumulation of epicardial and pericardial fat is linked to the severity of structural and functional alterations of the heart. The role of increased intramyocardial TG in MetS is more complex and merits further study.

Keywords

Cardiovascular magnetic resonanceProton magnetic resonance spectroscopyMetabolic syndromeObesityDiastolic dysfunctionMyocardial triglyceride contentEpicardial fatPericardial fatCardiac steatosis

Background

Cardiovascular diseases are a common co-morbidity of the worldwide obesity epidemic. Abdominal obesity in particular associates with metabolic syndrome (MetS) and type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Excess calorie intake and sedentary lifestyle combined with unfavorable genotype and several environmental factors result in lipid overflow, due to a failure of subcutaneous adipose tissue to expand and store the excess of circulating free fatty acids (FFA). Consequently, ectopic fat accumulates around the viscera and into sites regularly containing only minor amount of adipose tissue, such as the liver, pancreas, skeletal muscle, and heart [1, 2]. Ectopic fat deposits have been subdivided into those with local and those with systemic effects [2, 3]. According to this, perivascular, myocardial, and epi/pericardial fat have mainly local unfavorable effects, whereas visceral adipose tissue, or fat in the liver or skeletal muscles have systemic effects due to the fundamental role of these organs in glucose, insulin, and lipid metabolism. In this context, both the amount and location of ectopic adipose tissue are highly important with respect to the cardiovascular morbidity and mortality.

Heart-related fat can be subdivided into myocardial, epicardial, and pericardial fat [4]. In recent years, 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-MRS) has proved to be a reliable method to noninvasively quantify cardiomyocytic triglyceride (TG) content in vivo[5]. Increased cardiac adiposity has been associated with obesity, impaired glucose tolerance, and T2DM [68]. Animal studies have provided evidence on a close relationship between cardiac lipotoxicity and impaired left ventricular (LV) function [9]. In T2DM patients, myocardial TG content associates with LV diastolic dysfunction [10, 11]. The mechanism behind this phenomenon has remained unresolved, and also controversial reports have been published [8]. To our knowledge, only limited data exist on the relationship of cardiac steatosis and diastolic LV function in non-diabetic male subjects with MetS.

Subclinical LV dysfunction has been reported to associate with obesity and MetS by means of other imaging modalities [12, 13]. However, cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) studies allowing precise LV filling pattern analysis are limited [14, 15]. The present study focuses on the LV diastolic function with specific interest on the role of all three cardiac fat compartments in male subjects with MetS.

Methods

Study population

Male subjects were recruited by advertisements in local newspapers. The study recruitment is summarized and the rates of drop out at each stage are shown in Figure 1. The final study population consisted of 75 Finnish men of Caucasian ethnicity. Based on cardiometabolic risk factors, subjects were divided into two groups: those with MetS and those without MetS. To qualify for the MetS group, subjects must have waist circumference ≥ 94 cm in addition to two or more abnormal findings according to the harmonized definition of MetS [16]. The other subjects were classified as subjects without MetS. Exclusion criteria from the study included the following: other known acute or chronic disease based on medical history, physical examination, and standard laboratory tests (blood counts, creatinine, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, thyroid-stimulating hormone), T2DM (based on a 2-h oral glucose tolerance test), significant alcohol consumption (more than 20 grams per day), and treatment with other lipid lowering therapy than statins. As the hormonal status and use of contraceptives modify lipid metabolism in women, only male subjects were recruited. Smoking and elevated liver enzymes were allowed. Five study subjects were on regular medication for hypertension, three for dyslipidemia (statins), and one for both hypertension and dyslipidemia. In participants with MetS, coronary artery disease (CAD) was additionally excluded by adenosine stress perfusion CMR followed by late gadolinium enhancement images. The rationale for this was to exclude the potential interfering effects of CAD-associated myocardial scar tissue and/or altered cardiac function or lipid metabolism caused by myocardial ischemia. The study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Department of Medicine, Hospital District of Helsinki and Uusimaa, and each subject provided written informed consent to participate.
Figure 1

Details of study design. Blue boxes indicate the number of study subjects at each stage and boxes outlined in red indicate drop-out rates at each stage.

Demographic variables and biochemical investigations

Body mass index (BMI) was calculated by dividing weight in kilograms by the square of the height in meters (kg/m2). Waist circumference was measured at a level midway between the lower rib lateral margin and the iliac crest in the horizontal position. Blood pressure was recorded as an average of five measurements obtained in the sitting position after a 5 min rest using a BPM-200 monitor (Quick Medical, WA, USA). The subjects were classified as present, past, or non-smokers.

Blood samples were collected after an overnight fast. Total serum cholesterol, TGs, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol were measured by Konelab analyzer 60i with Konelab TM kits (both from Thermo Fisher Scientific, Finland). The concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was derived from the Friedewald formula [17]. Fasting and postload glucose were assessed by the hexokinase method (Gluco-quant, Roche Diagnostics, Basel, Switzerland) using either a Hitachi 917 or Modular analyzer (both from Hitachi Ltd, Tokyo, Japan). Serum insulin concentration was determined by double-antibody radioimmunoassay (Pharmacia RIA kit, Pharmacia, Uppsala, Sweden). The insulin-resistance homeostasis model assessment (HOMA) index was calculated by using the formula: (fasting plasma glucose x fasting plasma insulin)/22.5 [18].

CMR protocol

Cardiac imaging was performed with a 1.5 Tesla whole-body MR scanner (Magnetom Avanto; Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) with subject lying at rest in supine position. A multi-channel body coil was used for reception. Cine series were acquired in 4-chamber, 2-chamber and LV short axis orientations during breath hold using a retrospectively electrocardiographically gated steady state free precession gradient echo sequence. A stack of short axis cine series (typically 12 slices) was obtained covering the LV from base to apex with typical imaging parameters of repetition time 50 ms, echo time 1.18 ms, flip angle 69 degrees, matrix 186 × 220, field of view 355 × 420 mm, slice thickness 8 mm, gap 2 mm, and temporal resolution 32–53 ms.

Image analysis

Dedicated post-processing software (Argus; Siemens Medical Solutions, Erlangen, Germany) was used to perform a volumetric analysis of the LV. The analysis was performed by two radiologists with experience of CMR. LV ejection fraction, mass, end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and stroke volume (SV) were measured, and both volume parameters and mass were reported as indexed to the subject’s body surface area (BSA). An LV mass-to-volume ratio was calculated by dividing the LV mass by EDV. An LV global function index (LVGFI) was derived from the following formula: LVGFI = [LVSV/((LVEDV + LVESV)/2 + LV mass/1.05)]x100 [19]. An LV early diastolic peak filling rate (PFR) was obtained from the LV volume versus time curve. In diastolic dysfunction, PFR is decreased due to impaired LV relaxation and/or increased myocardial stiffness causing reduced suction effect. LV EDV normalized values of PFR (PFR/LVEDV) were also reported. The LV filling curve was visually inspected to identify the plateau between the early diastole caused by ventricular relaxation and the late diastole, the result of atrial contraction. The resulting diastolic plateau volume was divided by the EDV and the resulting percentile was reported as the ratio of early diastole. The physiological basis for measuring this index is that in the first phase of diastolic dysfunction, the proportion of LV filling in the early phase of diastole is reduced, and the contribution of left atrial contraction to LV filling is increased [20]. Diastolic dysfunction can be seen in LV volume kinetics as a depression of the diastolic plateau and as a shift from left to right in early diastole due to suppressed PFR (Figure 2).
Figure 2

Evaluation of diastolic function in left ventricular (LV) volume versus time curve. A) LV filling pattern in a normal subject. Early peak filling rate (PFR) is derived from the steepest gradient in the volume curve in the early filling phase. The horizontal white line demonstrates the diastolic diastasis phase (plateau) separating the early and late diastole. B) LV filling pattern in a metabolic syndrome patient with LV diastolic dysfunction demonstrating a depression of diastolic plateau and early PFR (arrow).

Quantification of myocardial TG content

For measuring the myocardial TG content, cardiac 1H-MRS was performed in a 1.5 T MR imager (Magnetom Avanto; Siemens AG, Erlangen, Germany) using a standard flex-coil for signal reception. The spectroscopic volume of interest was placed within the interventricular septum using the end-systolic cardiac cine images in three planes. The localizer images and spectroscopic data acquisition were double-triggered to end-exhalation and end-systole, using Prospective Acquisition Correction navigator echoes (PACE, WIP-sequence, program version B17) to control for respiratory movement and electrocardiograph-derived R wave to control for cardiac pulsation. Spectral localization and data collection were performed with the PRESS sequence with 35 ms echo time, while repetition time (TR > 3000 ms) did not fall below the respiratory cycle length. Navigator echoes were collected from the lung-diaphragm interface and the end-systole triggering was set at about 80% of the resting heart rate of the subject. The spectra were collected with and without water suppression, using 32 and 4 acquisitions, respectively, and analyzed with jMRUI v3.0 software [21] using the AMARES algorithm [22] to determine water (4.7 ppm), methylene (1.3 ppm) and methyl (0.9 ppm) resonance areas. The myocardial TG content was expressed as a ratio of fat to water (%). Correction for methylene T2 relaxation was not possible due to lack of reliable data for cardiac application.

Quantification of epicardial and pericardial fat

The 4-chamber oriented cine images were applied for measuring the epicardial and pericardial adipose tissue area as described previously [23]. All phases of the cine images were inspected and the measurements were performed in the single end-diastolic image using a standard radiologic workstation (Impax 5.5 software, Agfa Healthcare, Mortsel, Belgium). The areas of high intensity fat layers between the myocardium and the visceral pericardium (epicardial fat) and outside the parietal pericardium (pericardial fat) were measured (Figure 3). Intra-thoracic adipose tissue outside the pericardium in the particular slice was included to the value of pericardial fat. A stack of short-axis oriented end-diastolic T1-weighted turbo spin echo images was also obtained (with typical imaging parameters of: repetition time 1050 ms, echo time 29 ms, flip angle 180 degrees, matrix 256 × 256, slice thickness 6 mm, and gap 1.5 mm), and they were additionally used to aid in epi- and pericardial fat separation as well as in water and fat separation, once needed. Intra- and inter-observer variability of epicardial and pericardial fat quantification was evaluated by two radiologists on separate occasions by the measurement of 20 (10 MetS and 10 without MetS) randomly selected study subjects.
Figure 3

Determination of epicardial and pericardial fat. Contours of the epicardial (shown in blue) and pericardial (shown in red) fat were outlined in a 4-chamber oriented end-diastolic image.

Statistical analyses

All statistical analyses were performed with IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, version 19.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). Normality of continuous variables was analyzed by the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Logarithmic transformation of variables was performed, if necessary. Data are presented as frequencies or percentages for categorical variables, as means ± SD for normally distributed continuous variables, and as medians (range) for skewed variables. Between-group differences were assessed by the Mann–Whitney U test, unpaired t-test, and the chi-square test, as appropriate. Analysis of covariance was applied to compare the means or medians of LV dimensions and function with adjustment for age. Levene’s test was used to assess homogeneity of variances. To detect determinants of myocardial TG content and epicardial and pericardial fat, univariate age-adjusted analyses were performed. The results of the correlation analyses are presented both with and without Bonferroni correction. Stepwise multivariable regression analyses were used to evaluate the impact of cardiac fat depots on LV diastolic parameters as dependent variables. In univariate analyses, epicardial fat showed a strong relationship with pericardial fat. Therefore, these variables were not forced into the same multivariate model. Differences were considered statistically significant at p < 0.05. Intra- and inter-observer variability was assessed via intra-class correlation coefficients (ICC). Absolute agreement ICCs were calculated via a two-way mixed model for single measures.

Results

Subject characteristics

Clinical and biochemical characteristics and measurements of cardiac fat deposits are summarized in Table 1. Participants with MetS (n = 37) were, on average, 7 years older than subjects without MetS (n = 38) and included more current smokers. Subjects with MetS had greater waist circumference and BMI, and higher HOMA index compared with the subjects without MetS. Comparison of the serum lipid profile between the groups showed higher total cholesterol, low-density lipoprotein cholesterol and TGs, and lower high-density lipoprotein cholesterol in the MetS group. In MetS, myocardial TG content was on average twice higher than in subjects without MetS. The areas of epicardial and pericardial fat were significantly larger in the MetS group in comparison with the control group.
Table 1

Clinical and biochemical characteristics and cardiac fat compartments in the study population

 

MetS present (n = 37)

MetS absent (n = 38)

p

Age (years)

47 ± 6

40 ± 8

<0.001

Body mass index (kg/m2)

30.9 (24.2-42.5)

23.4 (17.6-29.8)

<0.001

Waist circumference (cm)

107.0 (94.0-135.0)

87.0 (71.0-93.5)

<0.001

Height (cm)

180 ± 6

180 ± 6

0.665

Current smokers (N, %)

13 (35)

4 (10)

0.014

Systolic blood pressure (mmHg)

132 ± 14

115 ± 10

<0.001

Diastolic blood pressure (mmHg)

88 ± 9

74 ± 6

<0.001

Total cholesterol (mmol/L)

5.25 ± 0.74

4.38 ± 0.80

<0.001

Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)

3.25 ± 0.71

2.52 ± 0.67

<0.001

High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (mmol/L)

1.02 ± 0.26

1.50 ± 0.40

<0.001

Triglycerides (mmol/L)

2.20 (0.65-6.26)

0.72 (0.35-1.57)

<0.001

fP-glucose (mmol/L)

5.8 (4.6-6.9)

5.0 (4.4-6.0)

<0.001

fS-insulin (mU/L)

9.3 (3.3-36.9)

2.9 (0.9-7.7)

<0.001

HOMA-IR index

2.6 (0.8-8.0)

0.6 (0.2-2.0)

<0.001

Myocardial triglyceride content (%)

0.90 (0.31-2.33)

0.43 (0.14-1.39)

<0.001

Epicardial fat (mm2)

838 (385-1753)

518 (251-1129)

<0.001

Pericardial fat (mm2)

1905 (615-6131)

562 (66-1582)

<0.001

Data are expressed as means (± SD), medians (range), or frequencies (%). HOMA-IR, the homeostasis model assessment insulin resistance.

Analysis of left ventricular function

An overview of the CMR data adjusted for age is shown in Table 2. In the MetS subjects, BSA- indexed values of LV ESV, EDV, and SV were smaller than in the subjects without MetS. LV volumes were within the normal range in both study groups, and differences remained significant after adjustment for the amount of exercise (data not shown). The LV ejection fraction was normal in all participants and comparable between the study groups. The LV mass indexed to BSA did not differ between the study groups. The LV mass-to-volume ratio was greater and the LVGFI lower in the MetS group compared to the control group, indicating concentric rather than eccentric remodeling. LV early diastolic PFR, PFR/EDV, and ratio of early diastole differed significantly between the study groups associating diastolic dysfunction with MetS.
Table 2

Left ventricular dimensions and function in the study population

 

MetS present (n = 37)

MetS absent (n = 38)

p

Systolic function and dimensions

 LV ejection fraction (%)

61 ± 6

62 ± 4

0.745

 LV end-systolic volume/Body surface area (mL/ m2)

25 ± 7

32 ± 5

<0.001

 LV stroke volume/Body surface area (mL/m2)

40 ± 8

52 ± 7

<0.001

 LV mass/Body surface area (g/m2)

58 ± 9

62 ± 7

0.190

 LV mass/End-diastolic volume (g/mL)

0.88 (0.66-1.32)

0.73 (0.61-0.90)

<0.001

 LV global functional index (%)

41 (24-51)

44 (35-54)

<0.001

Diastolic function and dimensions

 LV end-diastolic volume/Body surface area (mL/m2)

65 ± 13

84 ± 11

<0.001

 Peak filling rate (mL/s)

471 (238-909)

667 (329-1315)

0.002

 Peak filling rate/LV end-diastolic volume (s-1)

3.37 (1.89-5.46)

3.75 (2.63-7.23)

0.023

 LV early diastole (%)

68 ± 9

78 ± 8

0.001

Data are expressed as means (± SD) or medians (range). All parameters are adjusted for age. LV, left ventricular.

Correlation analysis of cardiac steatosis and LV diastolic function

Age-adjusted univariate correlation analysis (Table 3) revealed that the amount of epicardial and pericardial fat was inversely correlated with the parameters of diastolic function. Myocardial TG content correlated with the ratio of early diastole, but not with PFR. The LV mass-to-volume ratio, end-diastolic, end-systolic, and stroke volumes indexed to BSA correlated with myocardial TG content, and with pericardial and epicardial fat. The scatter plots demonstrate that correlations of PFR with epicardial and pericardial fat are mainly due to subjects with MetS (Figure 4).
Table 3

Univariate correlation analysis between cardiac fat compartments and left ventricular dimensions and function adjusted for age

 

Myocardial TG content

Epicardial fat

Pericardial fat

Fat depots

   

 Myocardial TG content

-

0.273*

0.297*

 Epicardial fat

0.273*

-

0.691‡a

 Pericardial fat

0.297*

0.691‡a

-

Systolic function and dimensions

 LV ejection fraction (%)

0.019

−0.052

0.019

 LV end-systolic volume/Body surface area (mL/ m2)

−0.257*

−0.312

−0.337†a

 LV stroke volume/Body surface area (mL/m2)

−0.275*

−0.413‡a

−0.370†a

 LV mass/Body surface area (g/m2)

−0.024

−0.235*

−0.225

 LV mass/LV end-diastolic volume (g/mL)

0.313

0.279*

0.255*

 LV global functional index (%)

−0.219

−0.246*

−0.178

Diastolic function and dimensions

 LV end-diastolic volume/Body surface area (ml/m2)

−0.303

−0.419‡a

−0.403‡a

 Peak Filling Rate (mL/s)

−0.115

−0.307

−0.329†a

 Peak Filling Rate/LV end-diastolic volume (s-1)

−0.102

−0.281*

0.297*

 LV early diastole (%)

−0.424

−0.438

−0.462

*p<0.05, p<0.01, p<0.001, without Bonferroni correction.

ap<0.005 with Bonferroni correction.

LV, left ventricular.

Figure 4

Correlations of left ventricular mass-to-volume ratio (LV mass/EDV) and left ventricular early peak filling rate (PFR) with different cardiac fat compartments. A-C) Relationship of LV mass/EDV and all cardiac fat compartments showing positive associations. D) Notice non-significant correlation of PFR and myocardial TG content, and E-F) significant inverse correlation between PFR and epicardial and pericardial fat. Open circles indicate subjects with MetS and closed circles subjects without MetS.

Finally, we used a multivariate correlation analysis to further evaluate the interrelationship between the individual cardiac fat depots and LV diastolic dysfunction (Table 4). We found that age and epicardial and pericardial fat were all independent determinants of PFR and PFR/EDV. Age and pericardial fat were also independent predictors of the ratio of early diastole. Interestingly, once the effect of age, waist circumference, body mass index, blood pressure parameters, and epicardial and pericardial fat were taken into account, myocardial TG content was not independently related to any parameter of diastolic dysfunction.
Table 4

Results of stepwise multivariable regression analysis

Independent variables

Model 1

Model 2

β

p

β

p

Dependent variable: Peak filling rate (mL/s) (log)

    

 Age

−0.406

<0.001

−0.379

<0.001

 Waist circumference (log)

−0.157

0.219

−0.164

0.214

 Body mass index (log)

−0.126

0.303

−0.138

0.257

 Systolic blood pressure

−0.074

0.521

−0.075

0.525

 Diastolic blood pressure

−0.088

0.440

−0.089

0.442

 Myocardial triglyceride content (log)

−0.024

0.830

0.002

0.989

 Epicardial fat (log)

−0.318

0.002

-

-

 Pericardial fat (log)

-

-

−0.316

0.003

Adjusted R2

0.317

<0.001

0.310

<0.001

Dependent variable: Peak filling rate/LV end-diastolic volume (log)

    

 Age

−0.276

0.018

−0.256

0.027

 Waist circumference (log)

−0.140

0.316

−0.161

0.266

 Body mass index (log)

−0.099

0.461

−0.122

0.360

 Systolic blood pressure

−0.003

0.981

−0.009

0.944

 Diastolic blood pressure

−0.035

0.781

−0.042

0.740

 Myocardial triglyceride content (log)

−0.019

0.878

−0.002

0.989

 Epicardial fat (log)

−0.303

0.007

-

-

 Pericardial fat (log)

-

-

−0.287

0.013

Adjusted R2

0.192

<0.001

0.178

<0.001

Dependent variable: LV early diastole (%)

    

 Age

−0.445

<0.001

−0.422

<0.001

 Waist circumference (log)

−0.375

<0.001

−0.204

0.082

 Body mass index (log)

0.235

0.296

−0.107

0.328

 Systolic blood pressure

0.009

0.934

−0.015

0.887

 Diastolic blood pressure

−0.131

0.243

−0.154

0.132

 Myocardial triglyceride content (log)

−0.087

0.442

−0.105

0.318

 Epicardial fat (log)

0.015

0.897

-

-

 Pericardial fat (log)

-

-

−0.405

<0.001

Adjusted R2

0.432

<0.001

0.451

<0.001

Epicardial fat is an independent variable in Model 1 and pericardial fat in Model 2. β = regression coefficient.

Reproducibility of fat quantification

Intra-observer reproducibility for epicardial fat assessment was high with a ICC of 0.97 and 0.99 for pericardial fat respectively. Inter-observer reproducibility showed ICC of 0.91 for epicardial and 0.96 for pericardial fat.

In order to test the repeatability of the 1H-MRS with WIP-sequence, we repeated the sequence in five subjects with varying degrees of myocardial TG content. Shim values and measurement parameters were kept unchanged. The measurements correlated (R2 = 0.9975) with a coefficient of variation of 9.0%.

Discussion

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study utilizing CMR technology to combine the measurements of all three cardiac fat compartments with detailed analyses of LV function in a group of non-diabetic men free of cardiovascular disease. The main findings of the study are as follows: 1) MetS is associated with LV diastolic dysfunction; 2) MetS-linked changes in the structure of LV are rather concentric than eccentric by nature; 3) ectopic accumulation of epicardial and pericardial fat correlates with the degree of LV diastolic dysfunction, and 4) myocardial TG content is not independently associated with LV diastolic dysfunction.

In our study, MetS was strongly associated with LV diastolic dysfunction, as demonstrated by lowered LV early diastolic PFR and ratio of early diastole. In earlier studies, reduced PFR in insulin-resistant obese women and in T2DM patients have been reported [10, 15]. Rider et al. reported similar findings in a female-dominant gender-mixed cohort consisting of markedly obese subjects (BMI 38.7) with unknown status of MetS [14]. Thus, the present study adds to previous knowledge on the association between MetS and LV diastolic dysfunction in non-diabetic male subjects with moderately increased BMI. Our results give further support to the role of cardiometabolic effects of visceral obesity in the development of obesity-associated LV diastolic dysfunction.

The LV mass was similar in the two study groups, but LV concentric remodeling was present only in subjects with MetS. Concentric LV remodeling has been associated with abdominal obesity and is considered as an early sign of obesity-related cardiac remodeling before the development of LV hypertrophy [24]. Furthermore, LVGFI has recently been introduced as a novel method to integrate LV structure with global function [19]. An LVGFI value of <37% was associated with a significant risk of cardiovascular events. In our study population, LVGFI was significantly lower in the MetS patients than in the subjects without MetS, also supporting the tenet that the nature of cardiac remodeling is rather concentric than eccentric in MetS.

MetS is strongly associated with an increased amount of visceral adipose tissue, which in turn is the best predictor of pericardial and epicardial fat according to our previous study [23]. An increased amount of epicardial fat is related to burden of atherosclerotic plaques, CAD (coronary artery disease) and myocardial ischemia [25, 26]. This CMR study confirms that epicardial fat is also strongly associated with LV diastolic dysfunction. This is in line with earlier findings based on echocardiography and computed tomography [27]. Epicardial fat is a metabolically active fat depot in a direct contact with the coronary arteries and myocardium. Animal studies have demonstrated that it shows higher lipogenic and lipolytic activities than other fat deposits [28]. However, little is known about the physiology of lipid storage in human epicardial fat [29]. It may have a constitutive role in cardiac lipotoxicity serving to store FFAs or as a protective buffer of TG accumulation in the myocardium. Furthermore, in obese patients it secretes proinflammatory cytokines with a role in coronary atherogenesis [30]. Finally, a mechanical role for the epicardial fat may be possible to taper the myocardial relaxation or to increase the myocardial stiffness.

Most studies have focused on epicardial adipose tissue, and a lesser role has been left to pericardial or intra-thoracic fat. In our study, pericardial fat correlated with diastolic dysfunction even on a larger scale of parameters than epicardial fat. Similarly, as a marker of ectopic fat accumulation, pericardial fat has been reported to associate with insulin resistance and 10-year CAD risk more strongly than epicardial fat [31].

Interestingly, unlike other cardiac fat deposits, myocardial TG content was not independently associated with LV diastolic dysfunction in multivariate analysis where other cardiac fat deposits are taken into account. In line with our results, two studies in insulin-resistant women, both without an assessment of epi/pericardial fat, reported the link between the myocardial TG content and diastolic dysfunction as of borderline significance [15] or negative [32]. Our findings challenge the concept of myocardial lipid accumulation as an unambiguous marker of diastolic dysfunction, as suggested by earlier studies in T2DM patients where myocardial TG content was found to be associated with impaired LV diastolic function [10, 11].

However, in subjects with MetS, myocardial TG content was increased up to two-fold compared with the subjects without MetS. Notably, the range of myocardial TG content (0.14-2.33%) was relatively narrow. Rather than a stable fat deposit, myocardial TG is a highly dynamic lipid pool, where up to three or four-fold increase has been reported following 48–72 h fasting in lean subjects [5, 33]. On the other hand, short-term lipid excess did not increase TG content in cardiomyocytes [9]. In diabetic subjects, 16 weeks calorie restriction decreased myocardial TG levels and improved diastolic function [33]. Hence, myocardial TG content may be adaptive to both short and long-term dietary interventions, and it may thus serve as a relatively rapidly changing reservoir of energy, in an analogous fashion to intramyocytic TG of skeletal muscle [34]. Normal heart utilizes FFAs and glucose as main energy sources with a ratio of 3:1 [35]. In the setting of obesity, the energy balance is shifted even more from glycolysis toward the increased β-oxidation of fatty acids [36]. In MetS, the increased intramyocardial TG may actually reflect the enhanced demand of lipids due to the preference of using fat more over glucose as the primary fuel of the heart.

In conclusion, our study suggests that although myocardial TG is elevated in subjects with MetS, it cannot be used as a surrogate parameter for cardiac function. Further studies are needed to examine the dynamics of intramyocardial lipids, and elucidate the role of their excess in the myocardium.

Limitations

To exclude the effects of hormonal variability, our study population was limited to men. Recently, the association of myocardial TG content and obesity has been studied also in female subjects [15, 32]. In our study, subjects with MetS were older than the controls producing a potential source of bias for the evaluation of cardiac steatosis and diastolic dysfunction. However, our results remained significant after adjusting for age. There was a clear difference in biomarkers between subjects with and without MetS, however, the differences other than MetS criteria might be significant confounders in terms of differences in LV structure and function. Although the measurements of diastolic function consisted of multiple parameters, they were based solely on LV short axis cine images. Other methods such as trans-mitral velocity-encoded flow analysis might have served as an internal reference. However, pitfalls of this technique include a pseudonormal E/A-pattern related to diastolic dysfunction, and common averaging errors of velocity measurements due to data gathering time of several minutes and intra-cycle variation. The measurement of the epicardial and pericardial fat may be prone to bias as it did not cover the entire volume of the particular fat tissue. However, in our preliminary data, this method correlates well with conventional but very time-consuming Simpson method [23]. Finally, the cross-sectional nature of the study design limits inferences of causality.

Conclusions

Metabolic syndrome associates with both structural and functional changes in the heart leading to LV diastolic dysfunction. The amount of epicardial and pericardial fat correlates with the severity of these changes. Myocardial TG increases as well, but it does not seem to act as a mere fat deposit in the same way as epicardial and pericardial fat. Instead, our study favors a more complex role for myocardial TG in obesity associated cardiovascular diseases.

Abbreviations

BMI: 

Body mass index

BSA: 

Body surface area

CAD: 

Coronary artery disease

CMR: 

Cardiovascular magnetic resonance

EDV: 

End-diastolic volume

ESV: 

End-systolic volume

FFA: 

Free fatty acid

1H-MRS: 

1H- magnetic resonance spectroscopy

ICC: 

Intra-class correlation coefficient

LV: 

Left ventricular

LVGFI: 

Left ventricular global function index

HOMA: 

Homeostasis model assessment

MetS: 

Metabolic syndrome

PFR: 

Peak filling rate

SV: 

Stroke volume

T2DM: 

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

TG: 

Triglyceride.

Declarations

Acknowledgments

We thank Hannele Hildén, Virve Naatti, Helinä Perttunen-Nio, and Sirpa Stick for skillful laboratory work; Marja Piitulainen, Miika Paukkunen, and Laura Impivaara for excellent technical assistance; Kristiina Kanerva for critical revision of the manuscript; and Samuli Ripatti for statistical advice.

Funding

This study was supported by grants from Helsinki University Central Hospital Research Foundation (grants TLD8100096, TLD8100156, TYH2009235 and YDL8100013), the Finnish Foundation for Cardiovascular Research, the Finnish Medical Foundation, and the Wilhelm and Else Stockmann Foundation.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki
(2)
Heart and Lung Center, Division of Cardiology, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki
(3)
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, Health Care Centre of City of Helsinki and University of Helsinki
(4)
Department of Radiology, HUS Medical Imaging Center, Helsinki University Central Hospital and University of Helsinki

References

  1. Cornier MA, Despres JP, Davis N, Grossniklaus DA, Klein S, Lamarche B, Lopez-Jimenez F, Rao G, St-Onge MP, Towfighi A, Poirier P: American heart association obesity committee of the council on nutrition, physical activity and metabolism, council on arteriosclerosis, thrombosis and vascular biology, council on cardiovascular disease in the young, council on cardiovascular radiology and intervention, council on cardiovascular nursing, council on epidemiology and prevention, council on the kidney in cardiovascular disease, and stroke council: assessing adiposity: a scientific statement from the american heart association. Circulation. 2011, 124 (18): 1996-2019. 10.1161/CIR.0b013e318233bc6a.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Despres JP: Body fat distribution and risk of cardiovascular disease: an update. Circulation. 2012, 126 (10): 1301-13. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.067264.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Britton KA, Fox CS: Ectopic fat depots and cardiovascular disease. Circulation. 2011, 124 (24): e837-41. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.077602.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Iozzo P: Myocardial, perivascular, and epicardial fat. Diabetes Care. 2011, 34 (Suppl 2): S371-9.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Reingold JS, McGavock JM, Kaka S, Tillery T, Victor RG, Szczepaniak LS: Determination of triglyceride in the human myocardium by magnetic resonance spectroscopy: reproducibility and sensitivity of the method. Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2005, 289 (5): E935-9. 10.1152/ajpendo.00095.2005.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Kankaanpaa M, Lehto HR, Parkka JP, Komu M, Viljanen A, Ferrannini E, Knuuti J, Nuutila P, Parkkola R, Iozzo P: Myocardial triglyceride content and epicardial fat mass in human obesity: relationship to left ventricular function and serum free fatty acid levels. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2006, 91 (11): 4689-95. 10.1210/jc.2006-0584.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Iozzo P, Lautamaki R, Borra R, Lehto HR, Bucci M, Viljanen A, Parkka J, Lepomaki V, Maggio R, Parkkola R, Knuuti J, Nuutila P: Contribution of glucose tolerance and gender to cardiac adiposity. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2009, 94 (11): 4472-82. 10.1210/jc.2009-0436.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. McGavock JM, Lingvay I, Zib I, Tillery T, Salas N, Unger R, Levine BD, Raskin P, Victor RG, Szczepaniak LS: Cardiac steatosis in diabetes mellitus: a 1H-magnetic resonance spectroscopy study. Circulation. 2007, 116 (10): 1170-5. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.106.645614.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Wende AR, Abel ED: Lipotoxicity in the heart. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2010, 1801 (3): 311-9. 10.1016/j.bbalip.2009.09.023.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Rijzewijk LJ, van der Meer RW, Smit JW, Diamant M, Bax JJ, Hammer S, Romijn JA, de Roos A, Lamb HJ: Myocardial steatosis is an independent predictor of diastolic dysfunction in type 2 diabetes mellitus. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 52 (22): 1793-9. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.07.062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Korosoglou G, Humpert PM, Ahrens J, Oikonomou D, Osman NF, Gitsioudis G, Buss SJ, Steen H, Schnackenburg B, Bierhaus A, Nawroth PP, Katus HA: Left ventricular diastolic function in type 2 diabetes mellitus is associated with myocardial triglyceride content but not with impaired myocardial perfusion reserve. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2012, 35 (4): 804-11. 10.1002/jmri.22879.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Masugata H, Senda S, Goda F, Yoshihara Y, Yoshikawa K, Fujita N, Daikuhara H, Nakamura H, Taoka T, Kohno M: Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction as assessed by echocardiography in metabolic syndrome. Hypertens Res. 2006, 29 (11): 897-903. 10.1291/hypres.29.897.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Orhan AL, Uslu N, Dayi SU, Nurkalem Z, Uzun F, Erer HB, Hasdemir H, Emre A, Karakus G, Soran O, Gorcsan J, Eren M: Effects of isolated obesity on left and right ventricular function: a tissue Doppler and strain rate imaging study. Echocardiography. 2010, 27 (3): 236-43. 10.1111/j.1540-8175.2009.01024.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Rider OJ, Francis JM, Ali MK, Holloway C, Pegg T, Robson MD, Tyler D, Byrne J, Clarke K, Neubauer S: Effects of catecholamine stress on diastolic function and myocardial energetics in obesity. Circulation. 2012, 125 (12): 1511-9. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.111.069518.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Utz W, Engeli S, Haufe S, Kast P, Hermsdorf M, Wiesner S, Pofahl M, Traber J, Luft FC, Boschmann M, Schulz-Menger J, Jordan J: Myocardial steatosis, cardiac remodelling and fitness in insulin-sensitive and insulin-resistant obese women. Heart. 2011, 97 (19): 1585-9. 10.1136/hrt.2011.224451.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM, Zimmet PZ, Cleeman JI, Donato KA, Fruchart JC, James WP, Loria CM, Smith SC: International diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention, hational heart, lung, and blood institute, American heart association, world heart federation, international atherosclerosis society, international association for the study of obesity: harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the international diabetes federation task force on epidemiology and prevention; national heart, lung, and blood institute; American heart association; world heart federation; international atherosclerosis society; and international association for the study of obesity. Circulation. 2009, 120 (16): 1640-5. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.109.192644.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Friedewald WT, Levy RI, Fredrickson DS: Estimation of the concentration of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol in plasma, without use of the preparative ultracentrifuge. Clin Chem. 1972, 18 (6): 499-502.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Wallace TM, Levy JC, Matthews DR: Use and abuse of HOMA modeling. Diabetes Care. 2004, 27 (6): 1487-95. 10.2337/diacare.27.6.1487.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Mewton N, Opdahl A, Choi EY, Almeida AL, Kawel N, Wu CO, Burke GL, Liu S, Liu K, Bluemke DA, Lima JA: Left ventricular global function index by magnetic resonance imaging--a novel marker for assessment of cardiac performance for the prediction of cardiovascular events: the multi-ethnic study of atherosclerosis. Hypertension. 2013, 61 (4): 770-8. 10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.111.198028.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Westenberg JJ: CMR for assessment of diastolic function. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep. 2011, 4 (2): 149-58. 10.1007/s12410-011-9070-z.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Naressi A, Couturier C, Castang I, de Beer R, Graveron-Demilly D: Java-based graphical user interface for MRUI, a software package for quantitation of in vivo/medical magnetic resonance spectroscopy signals. Comput Biol Med. 2001, 31 (4): 269-86. 10.1016/S0010-4825(01)00006-3.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Vanhamme L, van den Boogaart A, Van Huffel S: Improved method for accurate and efficient quantification of MRS data with use of prior knowledge. J Magn Reson. 1997, 129 (1): 35-43. 10.1006/jmre.1997.1244.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Graner M, Siren R, Nyman K, Lundbom J, Hakkarainen A, Pentikainen MO, Lauerma K, Lundbom N, Adiels M, Nieminen MS, Taskinen MR: Cardiac steatosis associates with visceral obesity in nondiabetic obese men. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013, 98 (3): 1189-97. 10.1210/jc.2012-3190.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Mandry D, Eschalier R, Kearney-Schwartz A, Rossignol P, Joly L, Djaballah W, Bohme P, Escanye JM, Vuissoz PA, Fay R, Zannad F, Marie PY: Comprehensive MRI analysis of early cardiac and vascular remodeling in middle-aged patients with abdominal obesity. J Hypertens. 2012, 30 (3): 567-73. 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32834f6f3f.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Rosito GA, Massaro JM, Hoffmann U, Ruberg FL, Mahabadi AA, Vasan RS, O’Donnell CJ, Fox CS: Pericardial fat, visceral abdominal fat, cardiovascular disease risk factors, and vascular calcification in a community-based sample: the Framingham Heart Study. Circulation. 2008, 117 (5): 605-13. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.107.743062.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Tamarappoo B, Dey D, Shmilovich H, Nakazato R, Gransar H, Cheng VY, Friedman JD, Hayes SW, Thomson LE, Slomka PJ, Rozanski A, Berman DS: Increased pericardial fat volume measured from noncontrast CT predicts myocardial ischemia by SPECT. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2010, 3 (11): 1104-12. 10.1016/j.jcmg.2010.07.014.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Cavalcante JL, Tamarappoo BK, Hachamovitch R, Kwon DH, Alraies MC, Halliburton S, Schoenhagen P, Dey D, Berman DS, Marwick TH: Association of epicardial fat, hypertension, subclinical coronary artery disease, and metabolic syndrome with left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Am J Cardiol. 2012, 110 (12): 1793-8. 10.1016/j.amjcard.2012.07.045.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Marchington JM, Pond CM: Site-specific properties of pericardial and epicardial adipose tissue: the effects of insulin and high-fat feeding on lipogenesis and the incorporation of fatty acids in vitro. Int J Obes. 1990, 14 (12): 1013-22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Sacks HS, Fain JN: Human epicardial fat: what is new and what is missing?. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2011, 38 (12): 879-87. 10.1111/j.1440-1681.2011.05601.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Sacks HS, Fain JN: Human epicardial adipose tissue: a review. Am Heart J. 2007, 153 (6): 907-17. 10.1016/j.ahj.2007.03.019.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Sironi AM, Petz R, De Marchi D, Buzzigoli E, Ciociaro D, Positano V, Lombardi M, Ferrannini E, Gastaldelli A: Impact of increased visceral and cardiac fat on cardiometabolic risk and disease. Diabet Med. 2012, 29 (5): 622-7. 10.1111/j.1464-5491.2011.03503.x.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Krssak M, Winhofer Y, Gobl C, Bischof M, Reiter G, Kautzky-Willer A, Luger A, Krebs M, Anderwald C: Insulin resistance is not associated with myocardial steatosis in women. Diabetologia. 2011, 54 (7): 1871-8. 10.1007/s00125-011-2146-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Hammer S, Snel M, Lamb HJ, Jazet IM, van der Meer RW, Pijl H, Meinders EA, Romijn JA, de Roos A, Smit JW: Prolonged caloric restriction in obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus decreases myocardial triglyceride content and improves myocardial function. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008, 52 (12): 1006-12. 10.1016/j.jacc.2008.04.068.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. van Loon LJ, Goodpaster BH: Increased intramuscular lipid storage in the insulin-resistant and endurance-trained state. Pflugers Arch. 2006, 451 (5): 606-16. 10.1007/s00424-005-1509-0.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Goldberg IJ, Trent CM, Schulze PC: Lipid metabolism and toxicity in the heart. Cell Metab. 2012, 15 (6): 805-12. 10.1016/j.cmet.2012.04.006.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Lopaschuk GD, Folmes CD, Stanley WC: Cardiac energy metabolism in obesity. Circ Res. 2007, 101 (4): 335-47. 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.107.150417.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Nyman et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.