Skip to main content

Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young



Sudden death in the young is a tragic complication of a number of medical diseases. There is limited data regarding the utility of post-mortem Magnetic Resonance (MR) imaging and Computer Tomography (CT) scanning in determining the cause of sudden death. This study sought to compare the accuracy of post-mortem cross-sectional imaging (MR and CT) with the conventional autopsy in determining the cause of sudden death in the young.


Consecutive patients from 2010 to 2012 (aged 1–35 years) who had sudden death were included. Patients were scanned by CT and 1.5 T MR imaging prior to the conventional autopsy being performed. The primary outcome was diagnostic congruence between imaging and conventional autopsy.


In 17 patients studied, the mean age at death was 23 ± 11 years, with a male predominance (n = 12; 71%). The most common cause of death was a primary cardiac pathology (n = 8; 47%), including ARVC (24%) and ischemic heart disease (12%). Non-cardiac causes identified included pulmonary embolism (6%), and aortic dissection (6%). MR imaging correctly identified the diagnosis in 12 patients who subsequently had positive findings at conventional autopsy, while the diagnosis in the remaining 5 cases remained unexplained. MR imaging was found to be highly sensitive (100%) with a high negative (100%) and positive (80%) predictive value.


Dedicated post-mortem MR imaging of the heart and brain is a useful modality in determining the cause of sudden death in children and young adults, particularly in situations where a conventional autopsy cannot be performed for logistic, cultural or personal reasons.


Sudden death is defined as death which is unexpected and natural, generally occurring within one hour of onset of symptoms [1]. A significant proportion of sudden deaths are unexplained, with no abnormalities identified at autopsy in approximately 18% (range 6-35%) [27]. Amongst sudden deaths attributable to a cardiac cause, structural abnormalities are detected at autopsy in approximately 69% [3]. These pathologies include ischemic heart disease, cardiomyopathy, myocarditis and aortic disease, all of which are routinely detected with cardiac imaging ante-mortem [27]. Approximately 30% of sudden cardiac deaths remain unexplained, most of which are presumed to be secondary to cardiac arrhythmias in patients with structurally normal hearts [3, 6, 8].

Traditional post-mortem examination of the deceased is performed by a trained forensic pathologist, and includes macroscopic and microscopic examination of the main organs, toxicology analysis, and biochemical testing [9, 10]. There are a number of issues with the traditional post-mortem examination including emotional trauma for the decedent’s family, cost of the procedure, and delay in delivery of the body to the family for religious rites of death, which is a significant issue for some religions [11]. Using post-mortem imaging as an alternative “minimally invasive” autopsy has been proposed [12]. The majority of studies to date examining the accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance (MR) imaging examination have focused on fetal and neonatal deaths [1317]. A single study comparing post-mortem CT and MR imaging in assessing cause of death in adults suggested CT may be more accurate in this setting [18]. Whilst it seems that high-field MR imaging has a definite role in the diagnosis of sudden natural death in the fetus, the utility in older decedents remains less certain [19].

The current study sought to assess the accuracy of post-mortem CT and MR imaging in determining the cause of death in children and young adults with sudden death, when compared to the gold standard of traditional invasive post-mortem examination.


Patient selection

Deceased patients were selected from those referred from the Sydney metropolitan area to the Department of Forensic Medicine (DFM), in Glebe, NSW, Australia. In this prospective study, consecutive patients from 2010 to 2012, aged between 1–35 years were screened. Those whose death was identified to be sudden were included. Any patients with trauma, suicide or known drug overdose were excluded. Staff at the DFM identified eligible patients upon receipt of the body of the deceased. Patients were then referred to the CT and MR imaging radiographers at the imaging department. Any patient for whom scanning time was available and would not delay time to autopsy by more than 24 hours were included. Verbal and written consent for the study was obtained from the deceased next of kin by trained senior grief counselors and study researchers. Verbal consent was also obtained from the duty coroner. The deceased were then transported to the imaging department in a non-ferrous bag covered with a drape, for scanning. Patients were scanned between 6-8 pm and were returned to the DFM after scanning for the conventional autopsy the following morning.

The circumstances surrounding the death and the deceased’s prior medical history, as obtained by police investigating the death on behalf of the coroner, were made available to the imaging team and to the autopsy pathologist prior to the commencement of their respective examinations. Both the imaging and pathology teams had access to this information. Neither team had access to the findings of the other prior to completion of their respective reports. Following completion of the imaging and autopsy reports, both teams had access to the full reports for comparison purposes. The CT and MR reports were included in the completed death investigation report, and made available to the Coroner and if requested to the next of kin of the deceased and medical practitioners treating the deceased and family members.

The study was conducted with the permission of the Office of the NSW State Coroner, and performed with maintenance of confidentiality, and in accordance with the Sydney Local Health District human ethics guidelines.

MR imaging protocol

MR imaging was performed on a Philips 1.5 T Achieva MRI system (Philips Medical Systems, Best, The Netherlands). The subject was placed on the scan table in the supine position within the body bag. Brain and cardiac sequences were acquired. The following sequences were acquired for brain scanning: sagittal T1, 3D T1 FFE, axial T2, Dual Echo STIR, coronal T2 FLAIR, FFE and IR. The cardiac sequences acquired included balanced FFE and T2 STIR in the short axis plane through the entire cardiac mass. A T2 STIR sequence was performed in multiple long axis cardiac planes including; LVLA, RVLA, four chamber, LVOT and RVOT. Myocardial oedema was diagnosed when there was increased by signal intensity on T2 weighted imaging. Specifically, significant hyper-intensity was defined when signal intensity was greater than 2 standard deviations of that of remote normal myocardium in the same slice, if this pattern did not correlate with a known coronary artery territory, the oedema was presumed to be secondary to myocarditis by the imaging team. Traditional radiologic planes were acquired, in particular in an axial T1, axial T2, axial T2 STIR and axial balanced FFE. Finally, a 3D whole heart sequence performed through the entire thorax, including the great vessels (Additional file 1: Table S1 MRI techniques). Images were reviewed by a cardiologist (RP, Level III SCMR accredited in Cardiovascular MR) and an experienced senior radiologist (GP) and blinded reports were generated.

CT protocol

CT scanning was performed on a GE VCT 64-slice scanner (General Electric corporation Milwaukie, USA). As with MR imaging, the subject was placed on the scan table in the supine position within the body bag. Non-contrast scanning was performed in helical mode in a cranial to caudal direction through the head, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis. Scanning parameters included: 120/140 Kvp, variable Mas (max 700) smart Ma set to noise index of 6 for the brain, 25 for the neck to pelvis and a rotation time of 1 second. Contiguous thin slice prospective reconstructions in the axial plane of 0.625 mm were generated using both soft tissue and bone algorithms. Multi planner images were then generated in the axial and coronal planes through the brain, neck, chest, abdomen and pelvis of a thickness of 5 mm. Thin slice data was copied onto disc for storage/review or any required reworking. Subsequently, data was reviewed by the senior radiologist (GP) and a report was generated. Both the CT and MR imaging reporters were blinded to the results of the conventional autopsy, and only had access to the autopsy report and results of other post-mortem investigations after their reports had been generated.

Conventional autopsy

Following post-mortem MR imaging and CT scanning, conventional autopsy was performed in all cases by a trained pathologist (JD). This included toxicology for common drugs and poisons. Histology was performed on all major body organs as per standard protocols. Fixed brain neuropathological examination was performed in cases where the pathologist had a high index of suspicion of neuropathological abnormalities. Identification of pathology in the subject was as per standard autopsy criteria. Blood samples were taken at time of autopsy for molecular genetic testing [9].

Statistical analysis

Statistical analysis was carried out using Microsoft Excel and GraphPad Prism (Version 6.0) software. Continuous variables were analysed using unpaired t-tests. A p value was considered significant if <0.05. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value and negative predictive value were calculated using standard formulae.


Cohort characteristics

There were 17 patients identified from 2010 to 2012 who were appropriate for post-mortem imaging investigation. The baseline characteristics are shown in Table 1. The mean age at death was 22.7 ± 10.8 years (range of 1.5 to 35 years. The majority (n = 12, 71%) of the patients were male. The mean body mass index (excluding the one patient aged 18 months) was 25.6 ± 5.8 kg/m2. There was a family history of sudden death in two patients (12%). The details surrounding the circumstances of the deaths are shown in Table 2.

Table 1 Baseline characteristics of young sudden death cases (n = 17)
Table 2 Circumstances of sudden death

Post-mortem autopsy findings

The mean time to autopsy was 56.1 ± 17.2 hours. The most common cause of death was primary cardiac pathology (n = 8, 47%). Of these half (n = 4, 24%) were found to be due to arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy (ARVC) (Figure 1). Amongst these patients there were pathognomonic histopathological features of ARVC. All had macroscopic evidence of RVOT fat, with one also having obvious RV dilatation. Histologically three of these patients had evidence of interstitial fibrosis, two had replacement fibrosis and all four patients had histological fibro-fatty infiltration.Amongst the four other patients who died secondary to cardiac causes (Figure 2), two patients (12%) died secondary to ischemic heart disease. Both of these patients had evidence of significant coronary artery disease macroscopically. One had evidence of acute thrombus in the left anterior descending artery and one had severe atherosclerosis with evidence of acute plaque rupture. One patient died secondary to hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM). This was a known premorbid diagnosis, however the patient had been lost to follow up for over five years. This patient had macroscopic evidence of severe asymmetric septal hypertrophy (interventricular wall thickness 20 mm) and histologic evidence of myocyte hypertrophy, myofibre disarray, replacement fibrosis and interstitial fibrosis. The final patient had cardiac death secondary to myocarditis, with evidence of macroscopic focal mottling with endocardial discolouration, with microscopic lymphocytic and plasma cell infiltrate with myocardial necrosis.Two patients died from neurological causes (n = 2, 12%). One patient died due to a primary brain tumour (glioblastoma multiforme) and one from sudden unexplained death in epilepsy (SUDEP) in a patient with Alagille syndrome (Figure 3). There were two deaths (12%) secondary to primary vascular causes. One death was due to aortic dissection with cardiac tamponade and one due to bilateral pulmonary emboli (Figure 4). Five of the patients (35%) did not have a cause of death identified at conventional autopsy, with the death being labelled as “unexplained”.

Figure 1

Post-mortem histopathology with correlating MR images in four patients with ARVC. (A and B) Patient 2: Right ventricular outflow tract showing established focal fibrosis. Movat pentachrome stain, 10x objective. Sagittal thoracic MR b-FFE image demonstrating marked RVOT dilatation. (C and D) Patient 10: Interventricular septum showing extensive fatty infiltration and fibrosis with associated loss of myocytes. H&E stain, 2x objective. Oblique axial 3-d whole heart MR image demonstrating marked RV and RA dilatation. (E and F) Patient 11: Right ventricular outflow tract showing established fibrosis and fatty infiltration. Movat pentachrome stain, 10x objective. Basal short axis b-FFE MR image demonstrating severe RV dilatation. (G and H) Patient 15: Right ventricular outflow tract showing focal fibrosis, scanty lymphocytic infiltrate and extensive fatty infiltration. H&E stain, 10x objective. 4-chamber b-FFE MR image demonstrating moderate RV dilatation.

Figure 2

Post-mortem histopathology with correlating MR images in three patients with other cardiac causes of death. (A and B) Patient 1 with HCM: Interventricular septum showing myocyte disarray and hypertrophy. H&E stain, 10x objective. 4-chamber b-FFE MR image demonstrating severe basal septal hypertrophy and normal lateral wall thickness. (C and D) Patient 3 with acute myocardial infarction. Left anterior descending coronary artery atherosclerosis with acute occlusive thrombus. Movat pentachrome stain, 2x objective. 4-chamber T2 STIR MR image demonstrating regional hyperintense signal in the distal lateral wall, consistent with acute myocardial infarction/oedema. (E and F) Patient 13 with myocarditis. Myocardium showing extensive lymphohistiocytic infiltrate with associated myocyte necrosis. H&E stain, 10x objective. Short axis T2 STIR MR image demonstrating diffuse hyperintense signal in the basal infero-septal wall, consistent with myocarditis/myocardial oedema.

Figure 3

Post-mortem pathology with correlating MR image in two patients with death secondary to neurological pathology. (A and B) Patient 4 with Alagille syndrome. Liver showing a relative paucity of bile ducts in portal tract, typical of Alagille syndrome (arteriohepatic dysplasia). H&E stain, 40x objective. Coronal T1 inversion recovery brain MR image demonstrating unusual grey matter signal in temporal lobe white matter, suggesting grey matter heterotopia (C and D) Patient 17 with primary brain tumour. Thalamic glioblastoma multiforme, Grade IV, with intratumoral haemorrhage. Sagittal T2 weighted MR Image showing large well-circumscribed mass lesion in right thalamus with associated haemorrhage consistent with vascular tumour

Figure 4

Post-mortem histopathology with correlating MR image and correlating CT image in two patients with death secondary to primary vascular cause. (A, B and C) Patient 5 with aortic dissection and cardiac tamponade. Aorta showing marked cystic medial degeneration with large pools of acid mucin. Marked disruption of the elastin fibres is noted. Movat pentachrome stain, 10x objective. MR 3-d whole heart image demonstrating severe ascending aortic dilatation, where there is aortic dissection noted posteriorly and there is an associated large haemopericardium. CT image also demonstrating dilated ascending aorta and haemopericardium. The region of dissection is less well identified due to the lower resolution of this scan when compared to the dedicated MR imaging. (D, E and F) Patient 12 with bilateral pulmonary emboli. Occlusive thromboembolism showing early healing by organisation in large pulmonary artery. Movat pentachrome stain, 2x objective. MR 3-d whole heart image demonstrating bilateral pulmonary emboli in the distal branch pulmonary arteries. Note the heterogeneous signal from this region of clot, especially when compared to the more proximal pulmonary arteries, which is more typical of the expected homogenous signal derived from post-mortem related clot. CT showing the branch pulmonary arteries, where clot in the distal RPA is better visualised than in the LPA and the imaging is generally lower resolution than the dedicated MR Imaging.

Comparison of autopsy and imaging findings

Compared to the gold standard traditional post-mortem evaluation, MR imaging correctly identified the pathology in 12 patients. Importantly, there were no false negative results. There were two true negative results from MR imaging as well as three false positives (one incorrect diagnosis of each of HCM, ARVC and pneumonia (Figure 5). MR imaging was found to be highly sensitive (100%) with a high negative predictive value (100%). There was also a high positive predictive value (80%). Specificity of MR imaging was 40% due to the three false positive results. The general accuracy of computer tomography (CT) scanning was lower than with MR imaging. CT scanning only identified the correct pathology in three cases. The sensitivity of post-mortem CT scanning was 33% with a negative predictive value of 45%. The positive predictive value was 50% with a specificity of 63%.

Figure 5

Post-mortem MRI scans for patients with false positive imaging and unexplained autopsy diagnosis. (A) Patient 7 with incorrect diagnosis of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. Short axis STIR showing asymmetrically increased wall thickness in the posterior left ventricular wall. (B) Patient 9 with incorrect diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy. 4-chamber STIR showing relatively larger RV size in comparison to LV. (C) Patient 6 with incorrect diagnosis of pneumonia. STIR image through lung and heart showing appearance of lung consolidation with associated collapse bilaterally.

There were five cases in which the cause of death was not identified at post-mortem. Amongst these cases, two patients had negative MR imaging results, and three patients had false positive MR imaging results. Amongst these same five patients, four had negative CT scans with one false positive CT scan.

Ventricular planimetry on MR imaging

A significant proportion of the cohort (n = 4, 24%) was found to have ARVC as their cause of death. MR imaging was able to identify these patients with a high degree of accuracy, particularly when using post-mortem ventricular area assessment. The patients who had ARVC as their cause of death were noted to have a significantly higher right ventricular (RV) to left ventricular (LV) area ratio (RV: LV = 2.2 ± 0.3) derived from direct planimetry of the endocardial surface from the 4 chamber STIR image, compared to those who did not have a diagnosis of ARVC (RV: LV = 1.1 ± 0.4, p = 0.0002) (Figure 6).

Figure 6

Scatter plot showing significantly larger RV: LV ratio in patients with ARVC (RV: LV= 2.2 ± 0.3) compared to those who did not have a diagnosis of ARVC (RV: LV= 1.1 ± 0.4, p=0.0002).


In this study, the conventional autopsy was compared to CT and MR imaging in establishing the underlying cause of sudden death in the young. When compared to the “gold-standard” of conventional autopsy, a high utility in performing MR imaging in cases of sudden death was demonstrated, where the sensitivity, and positive and negative predictive values were high. However, the specificity of this modality was considerably lower. By comparison, CT had lower sensitivity, positive and negative predictive values but did have a higher specificity. These findings confirm a definite role for brain and cardiac MR imaging in cases of sudden death in the young, where traditional conventional autopsy is not possible, with implications for screening family members of the decedent.

There are relatively few published studies examining the role of post-mortem imaging in children and adults compared with conventional autopsy [13, 15, 1722]. In a systematic review performed by Thayyil et al., 35 children and adults had been studied in this way between 1990 and 2009, where the sensitivity was 28% and the specificity was 64% for these studies [22]. The diagnostic yield of MR imaging favoured identifying pathology in fetuses, rather than in older children or adults. In 2012, Roberts et al., presented the largest cohort to date of adult deaths investigated with post-mortem CT and MR imaging and found that CT was the superior modality in this validation study [18]. The investigators reported high discrepancy rates generally between radiology and conventional autopsy, which varied between 32-43% and may in part reflect the difference in CT technology used (16 slice or less) and/or differing cardiac MR imaging protocols performed. Interestingly, common causes of sudden death cases specifically were frequently missed on CT and MR imaging in the study, however the overall impression was that CT and MR imaging may be useful in some circumstances compared with the traditional autopsy [18]. Most recently, a series of 400 post-mortem cases in fetuses and children was reported, which showed high sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive values in identifying structural cardiac pathology post-mortem with cardiac MR imaging [17]. While the cohort differs from our study as they only included fetuses and children ≤16 years, with nearly three quarters of their cohort being stillborn fetuses, the study supports the utility of post-mortem MR imaging as an alternative to conventional autopsy.

In our current study, performed in a centre with a high degree of MR imaging expertise, the findings support the notion that cross-sectional imaging with MR imaging and whole body CT has an important role in the diagnosis of intra- and extra- cardiac and brain pathologies at post-mortem. Importantly, where these structural causes of death are excluded, this allows the focus of the investigation to concentrate on genetic and inherited pathologies, such as channelopathies [5, 8, 10, 23]. The high sensitivity and PPV of MR imaging suggests this modality to be a good “rule out” test in the investigation of sudden death. Our study also supports an important role for MR imaging in the diagnosis of extra-cardiac or brain pathology. Specifically, the diagnosis of great vessel pathology such as aortic rupture and large pulmonary emboli were reliably detected with MR imaging.

Amongst the intra-cardiac group, there was a high detection rate of presumed ARVC, which relied on the presence of global or regional dilatation of the RV in the absence of any other obvious loading conditions, such as pulmonary valve or artery pathology [24]. We suggest that when the RV area is greater than two times the LV area on a 4-chamber MR imaging view of the heart or when there is regional dilatation present in the RVOT, that the diagnosis of ARVC should be considered. It should be noted that our protocols for the heart include multiple long and short axis planes of the heart, along its own oblique axis rather than in conventional radiologic planes, which have not been specifically investigated in previous reports [18, 19]. This may allow for greater sensitivity in detecting cardiac pathology post-mortem. Our study showed both MR imaging and CT to be accurate in diagnosis of neurological abnormalities, which is consistent with other earlier studies [13, 15].

Importantly, there were no false negative cases in our cohort and three false positive cases. There are important lessons to be learnt, even from this small cohort where caution should be exercised in the post-mortem diagnosis of HCM and lung pathology on MR imaging. Macroscopic lung appearances at post-mortem do not correlate well with histological findings [25], and similarly post-mortem imaging studies of the lungs have been shown to be inaccurate, except in diagnosing major structural abnormalities [19]. Indeed in our cohort, there was an incorrect diagnosis of pneumonia through MR imaging in a patient whose conventional autopsy diagnosis remained unexplained, while a diagnosis of pulmonary embolism was correctly identified by both MR and CT imaging. HCM often presents diagnostic difficulties at post-mortem due to myocardial oedema increasing the apparent wall thickness of the heart, especially at the level of the papillary muscle. In our series, there were two such cases, one where hypertrophy involving the basal septum and MR imaging correctly identified HCM. The other was thought to be an atypical variant of HCM, where hypertrophy affected the mid-posterior wall at the level of the papillary muscle. We recommend that this diagnosis only be made in the basal septal region where there is definite asymmetry and encourage the use of genotyping [26] and histological confirmation of myocardial disarray.

Although CT imaging is more likely to be available for use in most forensic facilities, in the context of sudden death in adults, this modality had disappointingly low levels of diagnostic accuracy. As expected CT imaging was able to identify brain and extra-cardiac pathology similar to MR imaging. However, CT was unable to define accurately any of the intra-cardiac pathologies that were apparent on MR imaging. The inability of CT to characterise myocardial structure and tissue characteristics as with T1/T2 (STIR) weighted MR imaging needs to be balanced against the shorter acquisition times and much larger fields of view obtained. Although, contrast CT is traditionally regarded the best non-invasive test for diagnosing coronary pathologies [18], neither modality could identify coronary thrombosis post-mortem, where MR imaging was able to confirm distinct regional infarction in the myocardium with localised hyper-intense signal on T2 weighted imaging. Technologies are currently being developed for post-mortem angiographic techniques, however these remain experimental at present [2729].

Study limitations

Although MR imaging has been demonstrated to have clear advantages over CT in this study, there are aspects of the technology that mitigate against ready introduction of MR equipment in even well-funded forensic pathology facilities. The equipment is expensive and usually requires extensive modifications to the autopsy building. Staff operating the equipment also require a significantly higher level of training than CT operators, and there is little expertise in interpreting autopsy MR images. Consequently, in those forensic pathology facilities where there is no access to MR expertise, this usually requires transportation of the deceased off-site, and after hours access to the imaging facility. Although about 2000 autopsies are performed at DFM per annum, and it can be expected that about 40 deaths per annum will fulfil the age and circumstances of death criteria of this study, only a minority of these deaths were able to be part of the study because of difficulties in obtaining timely consent, limited available time for scanning in the evening, and the requirement that the autopsy not be unduly delayed.

It should be noted that the positive and negative predictive value of each modality is not completely intrinsic to the imaging modality assessed, but is also influenced by the prevalence of the pathologies diagnosed, which generally occur at low levels in a population the size of Sydney, Australia. Further, as the time from death to study or true post-mortem interval is unknown in many cases of sudden death, this is likely to influence the findings of cross-sectional imaging and hence alter the diagnostic capabilities. Findings from post-mortem T2 imaging may be limited by low specificity for differentiating certain cardiac pathologies and maybe influenced by the post-mortem interval. Where there was obvious myocardial oedema on T2 weighted imaging which did not correlate with a defined coronary artery territory the imaging team made a presumptive diagnosis of myocarditis. If the widespread use of post-mortem MRI scanning were to be initiated in the future for minimally invasive autopsy, these nonspecific findings would need to be correlated with histological findings, potentially through minimally invasive biopsy of the corresponding tissue.

Finally, the comparison between whole body CT and organ dedicated MR imaging may not be regarded as an entirely fair comparison, but does reflect the “real-life” possibilities at forensic facilities required to perform this kind of investigation. Imaging at a higher field strength, such as 3 T or higher, has been shown to improve resolution and accuracy of MR imaging in the post-mortem setting in foetuses [30].


We demonstrate that dedicated post-mortem MR imaging of the heart and brain to be a useful modality in the setting of sudden death in children and adults. Whole body CT was less useful for intra-cardiac pathology when compared to MR imaging, however does have a role in the diagnosis of brain and extra-cardiac lesions. In situations where for cultural reasons, for example, a traditional autopsy cannot be performed, we suggest that cross-sectional imaging can be informative as the cause of death and may have important implications for screening of first-degree family members in cardiac causes of sudden death that may be inherited.


  1. 1.

    Myerburg RJ CA: Cardiac arrest and sudden cardiac death. Braunwald's Heart Disease: A Textbook on cardiovascular MEdicine. 2007, Philadelphia: Saunders Elsevier, 933-73.

    Google Scholar 

  2. 2.

    Eckart RE, Scoville SL, Campbell CL, Shry EA, Stajduhar KC, Potter RN, Pearse LA, Virmani R: Sudden death in young adults: a 25-year review of autopsies in military recruits. Ann Intern Med. 2004, 141: 829-34. 10.7326/0003-4819-141-11-200412070-00005.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. 3.

    van der Werf C, van Langen IM, Wilde AA: Sudden death in the young: what do we know about it and how to prevent?. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2010, 3: 96-104. 10.1161/CIRCEP.109.877142.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. 4.

    di Gioia CR, Autore C, Romeo DM, Ciallella C, Aromatario MR, Lopez A, Pagannone E, Giordano C, Gallo P, G d’A: Sudden cardiac death in younger adults: autopsy diagnosis as a tool for preventive medicine. Hum Pathol. 2006, 37: 794-801. 10.1016/j.humpath.2006.03.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. 5.

    Priori SG, Wilde AA, Horie M, Cho Y, Behr ER, Berul C, Blom N, Brugada J, Chiang CE, Huikuri H, Kannankeril P, Krahn A, Leenhardt A, Moss A, Schwartz PJ, Shimizu W, Tomaselli G, Tracy C: HRS/EHRA/APHRS Expert Consensus Statement on the Diagnosis and Management of Patients with Inherited Primary Arrhythmia SyndromesExpert Consensus Statement on Inherited Primary Arrhythmia Syndromes: Document endorsed by HRS, EHRA, and APHRS in May 2013 and by ACCF, AHA, PACES, and AEPC in. Heart Rhythm. 2013, 2013: e75-106.

    Google Scholar 

  6. 6.

    Doolan A, Langlois N, Semsarian C: Causes of sudden cardiac death in young Australians. Med J Aust. 2004, 180: 110-2.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. 7.

    Puranik R, Chow CK, Duflou JA, Kilborn MJ, McGuire MA: Sudden death in the young. Heart Rhythm. 2005, 2: 1277-82. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2005.09.008.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. 8.

    Ingles J, Semsarian C: Sudden cardiac death in the young: a clinical genetic approach. Intern Med J. 2007, 37: 32-7. 10.1111/j.1445-5994.2006.01241.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. 9.

    Skinner JR, Duflou JA, Semsarian C: Reducing sudden death in young people in Australia and New Zealand: the TRAGADY initiative. Med J Aust. 2008, 189: 539-40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. 10.

    Semsarian C, Hamilton RM: Key role of the molecular autopsy in sudden unexpected death. Heart Rhythm. 2012, 9: 145-50. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.07.034.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 11.

    Geller SA: Religious attitudes and the autopsy. Arch Pathol Lab Med. 1984, 108: 494-6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. 12.

    Burton JL, Underwood J: Clinical, educational, and epidemiological value of autopsy. Lancet. 2007, 369: 1471-80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60376-6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. 13.

    Brookes JA, Hall-Craggs MA, Sams VR, Lees WR: Non-invasive perinatal necropsy by magnetic resonance imaging. Lancet. 1996, 348: 1139-41. 10.1016/S0140-6736(96)02287-8.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. 14.

    Cohen MC, Paley MN, Griffiths PD, Whitby EH: Less invasive autopsy: benefits and limitations of the use of magnetic resonance imaging in the perinatal postmortem. Pediatr Dev Pathol. 2008, 11: 1-9. 10.2350/07-01-0213.1.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. 15.

    Griffiths PD, Variend D, Evans M, Jones A, Wilkinson ID, Paley MN, Whitby E: Postmortem MR imaging of the fetal and stillborn central nervous system. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2003, 24: 22-7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. 16.

    Breeze AC, Jessop FA, Set PA, Whitehead AL, Cross JJ, Lomas DJ, Hackett GA, Joubert I, Lees CC: Minimally-invasive fetal autopsy using magnetic resonance imaging and percutaneous organ biopsies: clinical value and comparison to conventional autopsy. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2011, 37: 317-23. 10.1002/uog.8844.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. 17.

    Taylor AM, Sebire NJ, Ashworth MT, Schievano S, Scott RJ, Wade A, Chitty LS, Roberston N, Thayyil S: Postmortem cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses and children: a masked comparison study with conventional autopsy. Circulation. 2014, 129: 1937-44. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.113.005641.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. 18.

    Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Benbow EW, Lee SH, Harris JN, Jackson A, Mallett S, Patankar T, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC: Post-mortem imaging as an alternative to autopsy in the diagnosis of adult deaths: a validation study. Lancet. 2012, 379: 136-42. 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)61483-9.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. 19.

    Thayyil S, Sebire NJ, Chitty LS, Wade A, Chong W, Olsen O, Gunny RS, Offiah AC, Owens CM, Saunders DE, Scott RJ, Jones R, Norman W, Addison S, Bainbridge A, Cady EB, Vita ED, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM: Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: a prospective validation study. Lancet. 2013, 382: 223-33. 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)60134-8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. 20.

    Roberts IS, Benbow EW, Bisset R, Jenkins JP, Lee SH, Reid H, Jackson A: Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy. Histopathology. 2003, 42: 424-30. 10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01614.x.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. 21.

    Patriquin L, Kassarjian A, Barish M, Casserley L, O'Brien M, Andry C, Eustace S: Postmortem whole-body magnetic resonance imaging as an adjunct to autopsy: preliminary clinical experience. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001, 13: 277-87. 10.1002/1522-2586(200102)13:2<277::AID-JMRI1040>3.0.CO;2-W.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. 22.

    Thayyil S, Chandrasekaran M, Chitty LS, Wade A, Skordis-Worrall J, Bennett-Britton I, Cohen M, Withby E, Sebire NJ, Robertson NJ, Taylor AM: Diagnostic accuracy of post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging in fetuses, children and adults: a systematic review. Eur J Radiol. 2010, 75: e142-8. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.10.007.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. 23.

    Ackerman MJ, Priori SG, Willems S, Berul C, Brugada R, Calkins H, Camm AJ, Ellinor PT, Gollob M, Hamilton R, Hershberger RE, Judge DP, Le Marec H, McKenna WJ, Schulze-Bahr E, Semsarian C, Towbin JA, Watkins H, Wilde A, Wolpert C, Zipes DP: HRS/EHRA expert consensus statement on the state of genetic testing for the channelopathies and cardiomyopathies this document was developed as a partnership between the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) and the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA). Heart Rhythm. 2011, 8: 1308-39. 10.1016/j.hrthm.2011.05.020.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. 24.

    Marcus FI, McKenna WJ, Sherrill D, Basso C, Bauce B, Bluemke DA, Calkins H, Corrado D, Cox MG, Daubert JP, Fontaine G, Gear K, Hauer R, Nava A, Picard MH, Protonotarios N, Saffitz JE, Sanborn DM, Steinberg JS, Tandri H, Thiene G, Towbin JA, Tsatsopoulou A, Wichter T, Zareba W: Diagnosis of arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia: proposed modification of the task force criteria. Circulation. 2010, 121: 1533-41. 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.108.840827.

    PubMed Central  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. 25.

    Weber MA, Pryce JW, Ashworth MT, Malone M, Sebire NJ: Histological examination in sudden unexpected death in infancy: evidence base for histological sampling. J Clin Pathol. 2012, 65: 58-63. 10.1136/jclinpath-2011-200224.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. 26.

    Maron BJ, Maron MS, Semsarian C: Genetics of hypertrophic cardiomyopathy after 20 years: clinical perspectives. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012, 60: 705-15. 10.1016/j.jacc.2012.02.068.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. 27.

    Ross S, Spendlove D, Bolliger S, Christe A, Oesterhelweg L, Grabherr S, Thali MJ, Gygax E: Postmortem whole-body CT angiography: evaluation of two contrast media solutions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2008, 190: 1380-9. 10.2214/AJR.07.3082.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. 28.

    Roberts IS, Benamore RE, Peebles C, Roobottom C, Traill ZC: Technical report: diagnosis of coronary artery disease using minimally invasive autopsy: evaluation of a novel method of post-mortem coronary CT angiography. Clin Radiol. 2011, 66: 645-50. 10.1016/j.crad.2011.01.007.

    CAS  Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. 29.

    Saunders SL, Morgan B, Raj V, Robinson CE, Rutty GN: Targeted post-mortem computed tomography cardiac angiography: proof of concept. Int J Legal Med. 2011, 125: 609-16. 10.1007/s00414-011-0559-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. 30.

    Thayyil S, Cleary JO, Sebire NJ, Scott RJ, Chong K, Gunny R, Owens CM, Olsen OE, Offiah AC, Parks HG, Chitty LS, Price AN, Yousry TA, Robertson NJ, Lythgoe MF, Taylor AM: Post-mortem examination of human fetuses: a comparison of whole-body high-field MRI at 9.4 T with conventional MRI and invasive autopsy. Lancet. 2009, 374: 467-75. 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60913-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references


CS is the recipient of a NHMRC Practitioner Fellowship (#571084). This study was also supported by an NHMRC project grant (#632575). RP is the recipient of a NHMRC/NHFA Neil Hamilton Fairley Post-Doctoral Fellowship. BG is the recipient of a National Heart Foundation PhD scholarship. The authors acknowledge Dr Bob Bao for assistance with figures.

Author information



Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christopher Semsarian.

Additional information

Competing interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Authors’ contributions

RP performed MRI and CT studies and analysis. BG analysed data. HL and GP assisted with MRI and CT studies. LY was involved in recruitment of families. JD performed all autopsies and analysis. CS co-ordinated entire study, involved in analysis. All authors contributed to manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Electronic supplementary material

Authors’ original submitted files for images

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Puranik, R., Gray, B., Lackey, H. et al. Comparison of conventional autopsy and magnetic resonance imaging in determining the cause of sudden death in the young. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 16, 44 (2014).

Download citation


  • Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Right Ventricular
  • Sudden Death
  • Arrhythmogenic Right Ventricular Cardiomyopathy
  • Computer Tomography Imaging